McNulty Amy K, Wilkes Robert P, Marchand Brenda, Ingram Shannon, Mann Samantha, Sieracki James
Solventum, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 21;13:1568540. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1568540. eCollection 2025.
Not all wound patients are candidates for surgical debridement. A felted, reticulated open cell foam with an array of 10 mm holes (VFCC) for use with instillation therapy has been used to eliminate non-viable tissue from patient wound beds. The mechanisms for this have not been fully elucidated. The current study elaborates the biomechanical stresses, strains and work imparted to tissue with VFCC versus commonly used reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) dressings.
Finite element analysis (FEA) measured strain and deformation occurring at the tissue interface with VFCC or ROCF. FEA results were compared to those in a preclinical, porcine sloughy wound model.
The peak maximum principal strain imparted to tissue at -125 mmHg with VFCC was 27.8% versus 0.9% with ROCF. The frictional work around the holes in the VFCC was 0.179 mJ while negligible with ROCF.
The FEA model predicted high strains at the sides of the macrodomes of tissue pulled into the through holes and was consistent with slough removal in the preclinical study. Frictional work around the 10mmholes in the VFCC may pin the tissue leading to higher strain energy densities as tissue is pulled into the holes allowing for fracturing and removal of devitalized tissue.
并非所有伤口患者都适合进行手术清创。一种带有一系列10毫米孔的毡状、网状开孔泡沫(VFCC),用于滴注疗法,已被用于清除患者伤口床中的坏死组织。其作用机制尚未完全阐明。本研究阐述了与常用的网状开孔泡沫(ROCF)敷料相比,VFCC施加于组织的生物力学应力、应变和功。
有限元分析(FEA)测量了VFCC或ROCF在组织界面处产生的应变和变形。将FEA结果与临床前猪的湿性伤口模型中的结果进行比较。
在-125 mmHg压力下,VFCC施加于组织的最大主应变峰值为27.8%,而ROCF为0.9%。VFCC孔周围的摩擦功为0.179 mJ,而ROCF可忽略不计。
FEA模型预测,被拉入通孔的组织大穹顶侧面会出现高应变,这与临床前研究中的坏死组织清除情况一致。VFCC中10毫米孔周围的摩擦功可能会固定组织,当组织被拉入孔中时,会导致更高的应变能密度,从而使失活组织断裂并被清除。