Clear Emily R, Scott Allison M, Kwok Kelsie, Ribott Mark A, Waters Teresa M, Hogg-Graham Rachel
Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Department of Communication, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Health Equity. 2025 Aug 27;9(1):425-432. doi: 10.1177/24731242251371428. eCollection 2025.
Persons experiencing housing instability (PEHIs) are medically vulnerable and at increased risk for poor health outcomes, high clinical service utilization, and mortality. Unstable housing is just one of many social determinants of health or nonmedical factors influencing health outcomes.
Focus groups were conducted on-site at two Kentucky homeless shelters to assess the structure and perceived effectiveness of Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) partnerships. We share perspectives of homeless Medicaid enrollees who are living without housing on the interaction between Medicaid MCOs and homeless shelters addressing unmet social needs.
Three themes emerged from our qualitative analysis: (1) Benefits of and barriers to receiving various services through Medicaid, (2) Medicaid does not appear to interface well with community-based shelters, and (3) Medicaid enrollees living without housing perceive a lack of information from Medicaid. Concerns raised by participants included barriers to receiving services, strengthening resource and referral processes, and increasing communication with both CBOs and Medicaid enrollees. These concerns must be addressed to improve care and outcomes.
PEHIs rely on homeless shelters to help them enroll and utilize Medicaid rather than relying on Medicaid to identify and utilize CBOs. There are opportunities for improvement in how MCOs interact with PEHI enrollees. PEHIs utilize Medicaid and navigate cross-sector relationships in different ways than other Medicaid enrollees.
经历住房不稳定的人群在医疗方面较为脆弱,健康状况不佳、临床服务利用率高和死亡率上升的风险也更高。住房不稳定只是影响健康结果的众多健康社会决定因素或非医疗因素之一。
在肯塔基州的两个无家可归者收容所进行了焦点小组访谈,以评估医疗补助管理式医疗组织(MCOs)和社区组织(CBOs)之间伙伴关系的结构和感知效果。我们分享了无家可归的医疗补助参保者对于医疗补助MCOs与无家可归者收容所之间为满足未得到满足的社会需求而开展的互动的看法。
我们的定性分析得出了三个主题:(1)通过医疗补助获得各种服务的益处和障碍;(2)医疗补助似乎与社区收容所的衔接不佳;(3)无家可归的医疗补助参保者感觉从医疗补助方面获得的信息不足。参与者提出的担忧包括获得服务的障碍、加强资源和转诊流程,以及增加与CBOs和医疗补助参保者的沟通。必须解决这些担忧以改善护理和结果。
经历住房不稳定的人群依靠无家可归者收容所来帮助他们登记和使用医疗补助,而不是依靠医疗补助来识别和利用CBOs。MCOs与经历住房不稳定的参保者之间的互动方式有改进的空间。经历住房不稳定的人群使用医疗补助以及驾驭跨部门关系的方式与其他医疗补助参保者不同。