• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Best Practices for Surgical Safety in Orthopaedics: A Comprehensive Review of Checklist Implementation.骨科手术安全的最佳实践:检查表实施的全面综述
Cureus. 2025 Aug 6;17(8):e89476. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89476. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation.手术核对清单:对影响和实施情况的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):299-318. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
4
Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review.安全检查表是否能提高手术室的团队合作和沟通?系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):856-71. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000206.
5
Interventions for reducing wrong-site surgery and invasive clinical procedures.减少手术部位错误和侵入性临床操作的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 30;2015(3):CD009404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009404.pub3.
6
An overview of the use and implementation of checklists in surgical specialities - a systematic review.手术专科中检查表的使用和实施概述——系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.031. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study.外科环境下住院患者的安全性:队列研究。
BMJ. 2024 Nov 13;387:e080480. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080480.
2
Artificial intelligence-based perioperative safety verification system improved the performance of surgical safety verification execution.基于人工智能的围手术期安全核查系统提高了手术安全核查执行的效果。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Apr 15;16(4):1295-1305. doi: 10.62347/PUUT2092. eCollection 2024.
3
Psychological Safety and Hierarchy in Operating Room Debriefing: Reflexive Thematic Analysis.手术室汇报中的心理安全感和层级:反思性主题分析。
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:567-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.054. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
4
Never events in orthopaedics: A nationwide data analysis and guidance on preventative measures.骨科的“不应发生事件”:全国范围内的数据分析及预防措施指南。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2022;33(3):319-332. doi: 10.3233/JRS-210051.
5
Carbamazepine induced toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome overlapping during pregnancy in a South-East Asian patient: A case report.一名东南亚患者孕期卡马西平诱发中毒性表皮坏死松解症与史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征重叠:病例报告
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul 27;68:102616. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102616. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Retained Surgical Items: Evidence Review and Recommendations for Prevention.手术遗留物品:证据审查与预防建议
AORN J. 2019 Jul;110(1):92-96. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12740.
7
Review article: Current literature on surgical checklists and handoff tools and application for orthopaedic surgery.综述文章:关于手术核对清单及交接工具的当前文献及其在骨科手术中的应用
J Orthop. 2018 Dec 20;16(1):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.12.006. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
8
The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis.手术安全检查表与手术后患者结局:前瞻性观察队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
9
Wrong-Site Surgery in Orthopaedics: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Strategies for Prevention.骨科手术中的手术部位错误:发生率、危险因素及预防策略。
JBJS Rev. 2016 Jan 26;4(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00030.
10
The impact of surgical safety checklists on theatre departments: a critical review of the literature.手术安全检查表对手术室的影响:文献综述
J Perioper Pract. 2016 Apr;26(4):62-71. doi: 10.1177/175045891602600402.

骨科手术安全的最佳实践:检查表实施的全面综述

Best Practices for Surgical Safety in Orthopaedics: A Comprehensive Review of Checklist Implementation.

作者信息

Mohamed Ahmed, Fuad Usman, Hagroo Aasim, Elasad Alaa

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.

General Practice, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Aug 6;17(8):e89476. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89476. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.89476
PMID:40918872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12413923/
Abstract

Despite advances in surgical techniques and technology, surgical complications in orthopaedics remain a significant patient safety concern, with preventable major errors continuing to occur. The implementation of surgical safety checklists and time-out procedures has emerged as a critical intervention to enhance patient safety and reduce complications. This narrative review examines the role of surgical checklists and time-out procedures in reducing complications specific to orthopaedic surgery, analyzing their effectiveness, implementation challenges, and impact on patient outcomes. A comprehensive literature review was conducted examining peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines related to surgical safety checklists and time-out procedures in orthopaedic practice. Sources included studies on the available surgical safety checklist, never events data, and orthopaedic-specific safety interventions. Evidence demonstrates that structured surgical checklists and time-out procedures significantly reduce wrong-site surgery, retained foreign objects, and communication-related errors in orthopaedic practice. Applying surgical safety checklists in practice has shown effectiveness in reducing overall surgical complications and mortality. However, compliance rates vary significantly across institutions and countries. Surgical checklists and time-out procedures represent essential safety interventions in orthopaedic practice. While evidence supports their effectiveness in reducing complications and improving communication, successful implementation requires organizational commitment, staff education, and ongoing monitoring to ensure sustained compliance and optimal patient outcomes.

摘要

尽管手术技术和科技有所进步,但骨科手术并发症仍是患者安全的重大问题,可预防的重大失误仍时有发生。实施手术安全核对表和暂停程序已成为提高患者安全和减少并发症的关键干预措施。本叙述性综述探讨了手术核对表和暂停程序在减少骨科手术特有并发症方面的作用,分析了它们的有效性、实施挑战以及对患者预后的影响。我们进行了全面的文献综述,查阅了与骨科手术中手术安全核对表和暂停程序相关的同行评议文章、系统评价和临床指南。资料来源包括关于现有手术安全核对表、医疗差错事件数据以及骨科特定安全干预措施的研究。有证据表明,结构化的手术核对表和暂停程序能显著减少骨科手术中的手术部位错误、异物残留以及与沟通相关的错误。在实践中应用手术安全核对表已显示出在降低总体手术并发症和死亡率方面的有效性。然而,不同机构和国家的合规率差异很大。手术核对表和暂停程序是骨科手术中重要的安全干预措施。虽然有证据支持它们在减少并发症和改善沟通方面的有效性,但成功实施需要组织承诺、员工教育以及持续监测,以确保持续合规并实现最佳患者预后。