He Jianyang, Yang Ke, Wang Sheng, Li Yingmei, Bao Li, Zhang Naiming
College of Resources and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yunnan Engineering Research Center for Soil Fertilization and Pollution Remediation, Kunming, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Aug 21;16:1610041. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1610041. eCollection 2025.
Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) are homologous elements that pose significant threats to the ecological security of soil-crop systems and the health of agricultural products due to their co-contamination. Although they share similarities in plant uptake and translocation, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the uptake mechanisms of Sb, especially Sb(V), and its interactions with As. This review systematically summarizes the sources, chemical speciation, and bioavailability-regulating factors (e.g., pH, redox conditions, microbial communities) of Sb and As in soil-crop systems, focusing on their uptake pathways, translocation characteristics, and synergistic or antagonistic effects under co-contamination. Comparative analyses suggest that As(V) is taken up through phosphate transporters, whereas the transport mechanism of Sb(V) remains unclear. Under co-contamination, As may enhance Sb accumulation by altering membrane permeability; however, differences in their translocation efficiency and speciation transformation lead to antagonistic effects. Additionally, soil physicochemical properties and plant species significantly influence Sb-As toxicity responses. The detoxification mechanisms of hyperaccumulators (e.g., ) offer novel insights for remediation technologies. By integrating multidisciplinary findings, this review identifies key challenges in co-contamination research and provides theoretical foundations for farmland remediation and risk management based on bioavailability regulation.
锑(Sb)和砷(As)是同源元素,由于它们的共同污染,对土壤-作物系统的生态安全和农产品健康构成重大威胁。尽管它们在植物吸收和转运方面存在相似之处,但关于锑(尤其是五价锑)的吸收机制及其与砷的相互作用仍存在重大知识空白。本综述系统地总结了土壤-作物系统中锑和砷的来源、化学形态以及生物有效性调节因素(如pH值、氧化还原条件、微生物群落),重点关注它们的吸收途径、转运特征以及共同污染下的协同或拮抗作用。比较分析表明,五价砷通过磷酸盐转运体吸收,而五价锑的转运机制尚不清楚。在共同污染下,砷可能通过改变膜通透性增强锑的积累;然而,它们转运效率和形态转化的差异导致拮抗作用。此外,土壤理化性质和植物种类显著影响锑-砷毒性反应。超富集植物(如 )的解毒机制为修复技术提供了新的见解。通过整合多学科研究结果,本综述确定了共同污染研究中的关键挑战,并为基于生物有效性调节的农田修复和风险管理提供了理论基础。