膝关节造影还有作用吗？

Is there still a role for knee arthrography?

作者信息

Korn M W, Spitzer R M, Robinson K E

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 1985;1(1):40-3. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(85)80077-3.

PMID:4091908

Abstract

To assess the continued value of arthrograms in the wake of arthroscopic diagnosis, an analysis of arthrographic data on 240 knees was carried out. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the arthograms were compared with the arthroscopic findings for each knee. For meniscal lesions, the arthrogram is reasonably accurate. An algorithm is presented that defines the relative roles of arthrography and arthroscopy.

摘要

为了评估关节造影在关节镜诊断之后的持续价值，对240例膝关节的关节造影数据进行了分析。将每个膝关节的关节造影准确性、敏感性和特异性与关节镜检查结果进行了比较。对于半月板损伤，关节造影相当准确。本文提出了一种算法，该算法定义了关节造影和关节镜检查的相对作用。