Fillon Adrien A, Girandola Fabien, Bonnardel Nathalie, Kenworthy Jared B, Souchet Lionel
ERA chair of science and innovation Policy & Studies, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, 6015, Cyprus.
Department of Social Psychology, Aix-marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France.
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 7;13:904. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145939.1. eCollection 2024.
Previous research has indicated that individual differences play a role in group creativity. Group creativity activities have different outcomes, leading to numerous ways to assess the effectiveness of these creative activities. To date, no meta-analysis has been performed on the relationship between the outcomes of the creative activity and personal factors of the group members. In this Registered Report, we conducted a meta-analysis ( = 11, = 72) on the relationship between personal factors and group creativity outcomes. We found weak support for a positive correlation between self-efficacy and group creativity outcomes, between = .04 and = .67. We found weak support for a moderation effect of time constraint, with stronger relationships for conditions limited to 20 minutes as opposed to 10 minutes. Finally, we found that only a few studies could be included in the meta-analysis, because many studies (1) did not directly measure creativity, or (2) measured other, less common personal factors. We call for a more systematic and direct approach to measuring creativity and an improvement of open science practices in the field. Data and analysis can be found at https://osf.io/xwph9.
先前的研究表明，个体差异在团队创造力中发挥作用。团队创造力活动会产生不同的结果，从而产生了多种评估这些创造性活动有效性的方法。迄今为止，尚未对创造性活动的结果与团队成员个人因素之间的关系进行荟萃分析。在本预注册报告中，我们对个人因素与团队创造力结果之间的关系进行了荟萃分析（样本量n = 11，效应量k = 72）。我们发现，自我效能感与团队创造力结果之间存在正相关，效应量在0.04至0.67之间，但支持力度较弱。我们发现时间限制的调节作用支持力度较弱，与10分钟的条件相比，20分钟的条件下关系更强。最后，我们发现荟萃分析中只能纳入少数研究，因为许多研究（1）没有直接测量创造力，或者（2）测量了其他不太常见的个人因素。我们呼吁采用更系统、直接的方法来测量创造力，并改进该领域的开放科学实践。数据和分析可在https://osf.io/xwph9上获取。
