• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving ChatGPT's Performance in Orthopedics: Opportunities Using the CRISPE Framework.提升ChatGPT在骨科领域的表现:运用CRISPE框架的机遇
JOSPT Methods. 2025 Jun;1(2):56-60. doi: 10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0151. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Biologic Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Google Web Search.评估ChatGPT在系统性红斑狼疮生物治疗中的效用:ChatGPT与谷歌网络搜索的比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 28;9:e76458. doi: 10.2196/76458.
4
Examining the Role of Large Language Models in Orthopedics: Systematic Review.检查大型语言模型在骨科中的作用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 15;26:e59607. doi: 10.2196/59607.
5
Response to "Letter to the Editor-Exploring the Unknown: Evaluating ChatGPT's Performance in Uncovering Novel Aspects of Plastic Surgery and Identifying Areas for Future Innovation".对《致编辑的信——探索未知:评估ChatGPT在揭示整形外科学新方面及确定未来创新领域的表现》的回应
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04210-y.
6
Can ChatGPT be trusted as a resource for a scholarly article on treatment planning implant-supported prostheses?ChatGPT能否被视为关于种植体支持修复体治疗计划的学术文章的可靠资源?
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.025.
7
What's in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT.名字里的乾坤:ChatGPT 生成的推荐信中的性别偏见的实验证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e51837. doi: 10.2196/51837.
8
Generative artificial intelligence and machine learning methods to screen social media content.用于筛选社交媒体内容的生成式人工智能和机器学习方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Mar 14;11:e2710. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2710. eCollection 2025.
9
Exploring ChatGPT's Efficacy in Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Questions Compared to Adult Reconstruction Surgeons.与成人重建外科医生相比,探究ChatGPT在骨科关节置换问题方面的效能。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jul 14;34:101772. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101772. eCollection 2025 Aug.
10
Using Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT to Access Medical Information About Chemical Eye Injuries: Comparative Study.使用人工智能ChatGPT获取有关化学性眼外伤的医学信息:比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 13;9:e73642. doi: 10.2196/73642.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy: Evaluating ChatGPT's Role in Clinical Decision Support for Musculoskeletal Care.物理治疗中的人工智能:评估ChatGPT在肌肉骨骼护理临床决策支持中的作用。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Jan;53(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03676-4. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
2
Prompt Engineering Paradigms for Medical Applications: Scoping Review.医学应用的提示工程范式:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 10;26:e60501. doi: 10.2196/60501.
3
Foundation Models, Generative AI, and Large Language Models: Essentials for Nursing.基础模型、生成式人工智能和大型语言模型:护理必备。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 May 1;42(5):377-387. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001149.
4
Currently Available Large Language Models Do Not Provide Musculoskeletal Treatment Recommendations That Are Concordant With Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.目前可用的大语言模型并未提供与循证临床实践指南相一致的肌肉骨骼治疗建议。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Feb;41(2):263-275.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.040. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
5
Performance of ChatGPT Compared to Clinical Practice Guidelines in Making Informed Decisions for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Cross-sectional Study.ChatGPT 在腰椎神经根性疼痛知情决策方面的表现与临床实践指南的比较:一项横断面研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Mar;54(3):222-228. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12151.
6
Performance of ChatGPT on NASS Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Comparison Study.ChatGPT 在 NASS 腰痛诊断和治疗临床指南中的表现:一项对比研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 May 1;49(9):640-651. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004915. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Clinical reasoning using ChatGPT: Is it beyond credibility for physiotherapists use?临床推理使用 ChatGPT:理疗师使用它是否可信?
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Dec;40(12):2943-2962. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2291656. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT: A Guide for Academic Writers.《ChatGPT 提示工程:学术写作者指南》
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Dec;51(12):2629-2633. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03272-4. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

提升ChatGPT在骨科领域的表现:运用CRISPE框架的机遇

Improving ChatGPT's Performance in Orthopedics: Opportunities Using the CRISPE Framework.

作者信息

Vorensky Mark, Peredo Daniel, Ferraro Richard, Paris Emily, Mohammadi Asma, Spano Paul, Rao Smita

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.

Rusk Rehabilitation, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

JOSPT Methods. 2025 Jun;1(2):56-60. doi: 10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0151. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

DOI:10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0151
PMID:40919522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12412748/
Abstract

ChatGPT has been increasingly used in clinical practice, education, and research. In orthopedic research, ChatGPT's accuracy in clinical decision-making has been a major concern, with results ranging from 33% to 80% accuracy. Inaccuracies from ChatGPT can be harmful to clinicians, trainees, or patients when responses appear plausible, are trusted, and acted upon. A critical limitation in orthopedic research is the lack of structured prompt engineering, which significantly impacts ChatGPT's performance. The CRISPE (Capacity/Role, Insight, Statement, Personality, Experiment) framework offers a systematic approach to refining prompts and improving response accuracy. This Viewpoint applies the CRISPE framework to recent orthopedic research and highlights opportunities to optimize prompts in ChatGPT. While research is needed to validate and refine prompt engineering tools in orthopedics, these methods have the potential to enhance the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT's responses and serve as valuable tools in orthopedic practice, education, and research.

摘要

ChatGPT已越来越多地应用于临床实践、教育和研究领域。在骨科研究中,ChatGPT在临床决策方面的准确性一直是主要关注点,其准确率在33%至80%之间。当ChatGPT的回答看似合理、被信任并被付诸行动时,其不准确之处可能会对临床医生、实习生或患者造成伤害。骨科研究中的一个关键限制是缺乏结构化的提示工程,这严重影响了ChatGPT的性能。CRISPE(能力/角色、洞察力、陈述、个性、实验)框架提供了一种系统的方法来优化提示并提高回答的准确性。本观点将CRISPE框架应用于近期的骨科研究,并强调了在ChatGPT中优化提示的机会。虽然需要进行研究以验证和完善骨科中的提示工程工具,但这些方法有可能提高ChatGPT回答的准确性和可靠性,并成为骨科实践、教育和研究中有价值的工具。