Reuss Joshua E, Lee Paul K, Mehran Reza J, Hu Chen, Ke Suqi, Jamali Amna, Najjar Mimi, Niknafs Noushin, Wehr Jaime, Oner Ezgi, Meng Qiong, Pereira Gavin, Hosseini-Nami Samira, Sausen Mark, Zahurak Marianna, Battafarano Richard J, Hales Russell K, Friedberg Joseph, Sepesi Boris, Deutsch Julie S, Cottrell Tricia, Taube Janis, Illei Peter B, Smith Kellie N, Pardoll Drew M, Tsao Anne S, Brahmer Julie R, Anagnostou Valsamo, Forde Patrick M
Georgetown University, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Washington, DC, USA.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nat Med. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03958-3.
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is standard of care in advanced diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM), but its role in the perioperative management of DPM is unclear. In tandem, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) ultra-sensitive residual disease detection has shown promise in providing a molecular readout of ICB efficacy across resectable cancers. This phase 2 trial investigated neoadjuvant nivolumab and nivolumab/ipilimumab in resectable DPM along with tumor-informed liquid biopsy residual disease assessments. Patients with resectable epithelioid/biphasic DPM enrolled sequentially to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) for three cycles (Arm A, n = 16) or nivolumab 3 mg kg q2w for three cycles plus ipilimumab 1 mg kg on cycle 1 (Arm B, n = 14), followed by surgery, optional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and nivolumab 480 mg q4w for 1 year. Co-primary endpoints included safety and feasibility; key exploratory endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and ctDNA analyses. The trial met its primary endpoints, and, in Arms A and B, 81.3% and 85.7% of patients proceeded to surgery, respectively. Treatment was safe, with a single dose-limiting toxicity in each arm. In Arm A, median PFS and OS were 9.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-27.7) and 19.3 months (95% CI: 14.9-34.7), respectively. In Arm B, median PFS and OS were 19.8 months (7.1-not reached) and 28.6 months (20.4-not reached), respectively. Persistent ctDNA was detected during neoadjuvant therapy in patients who did not undergo complete surgical resection due to disease progression (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.00013). Patients with detectable ctDNA on cycle 3 and pre-surgery had shorter PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.027 and P = 0.0059, respectively); this association was more pronounced when quantitative ctDNA changes were considered (log-rank test, P = 1.8 × 10). Our findings support the feasibility of neoadjuvant ICB and the clinical utility of ctDNA analyses to capture residual disease in resectable DPM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03918252 .
免疫检查点阻断(ICB)是晚期弥漫性胸膜间皮瘤(DPM)的标准治疗方法,但其在DPM围手术期管理中的作用尚不清楚。与此同时,循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)超灵敏残留疾病检测在提供可切除癌症中ICB疗效的分子读数方面显示出前景。这项2期试验研究了可切除DPM中纳武单抗新辅助治疗以及纳武单抗/伊匹木单抗联合治疗,并进行肿瘤知情的液体活检残留疾病评估。可切除上皮样/双相性DPM患者按顺序入组,接受每2周一次240mg纳武单抗治疗,共三个周期(A组,n = 16),或每2周一次3mg/kg纳武单抗治疗三个周期,第1周期加用1mg/kg伊匹木单抗(B组,n = 14),随后进行手术、选择性化疗和/或放疗,以及每4周一次480mg纳武单抗治疗1年。共同主要终点包括安全性和可行性;关键探索性终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和ctDNA分析。该试验达到了其主要终点,在A组和B组中,分别有81.3%和85.7%的患者进行了手术。治疗是安全的,每组各有1例剂量限制性毒性反应。在A组中,中位PFS和OS分别为9.6个月(95%置信区间(CI):2.5 - 27.7)和19.3个月(95%CI:14.9 - 34.7)。在B组中,中位PFS和OS分别为19.8个月(7.1 - 未达到)和28.6个月(20.4 - 未达到)。在新辅助治疗期间,因疾病进展未接受完全手术切除的患者中检测到持续性ctDNA(Fisher精确检验,P = 0.00013)。在第3周期和术前可检测到ctDNA的患者PFS较短(对数秩检验,P分别为0.027和0.0059);当考虑定量ctDNA变化时,这种关联更为明显(对数秩检验,P = 1.8×10)。我们的研究结果支持新辅助ICB的可行性以及ctDNA分析在捕获可切除DPM残留疾病方面的临床实用性。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03918252 。