Huss Michael, Findling Robert L, DelBello Melissa P, Necking Oscar, Petersen Maria L, Schmidt Simon Nitschky, Rosen Monika
University Medicine of Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
JAACAP Open. 2024 Nov 22;3(3):736-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.11.002. eCollection 2025 Sep.
To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children ages 7 to 11 years with major depressive disorder.
Patients meeting criteria for incomplete improvement in depressive symptoms (Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised [CDRS-R] total score ≥40 plus <40% reduction and Parent Global Assessment Global Improvement score >2) after 4 weeks of single-blind lead-in treatment with a brief psychosocial intervention plus placebo were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 8-week double-blind treatment with brief psychosocial intervention and placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg/day, vortioxetine 20 mg/day, or fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Following preplanned interim analysis, enrollment to fluoxetine was stopped, and patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg, or vortioxetine 20 mg. The primary end point was change in CDRS-R total score from baseline to week 8 for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo.
Of 683 patients enrolled in single-blind lead-in treatment, 540 were randomized to the double-blind period. The mean (SE) change from randomization to week 8 in CDRS-R total score for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo was -19.6 (1.2) and -17.5 (1.4), with a mean difference of -2.1 (1.2) (2-sided = .0937). Overall, 47% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events in the double-blind period; nausea was the most common adverse event in the vortioxetine groups (11.1%-12.6%).
No statistically significant differences were observed in improvement in CDRS-R total score between placebo and vortioxetine; hence, efficacy of vortioxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder in children could not be confirmed. Safety and tolerability data were similar to that seen in adolescents and adults, with no outstanding safety concerns.
Active Reference (Fluoxetine) Fixed-dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Participants Aged 7 to 11 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02709655.
评估伏硫西汀治疗7至11岁重度抑郁症儿童的疗效、安全性及耐受性。
在经过4周简短心理社会干预加安慰剂的单盲导入治疗后,符合抑郁症状改善不完全标准(儿童抑郁评定量表修订版[CDRS-R]总分≥40分且降低幅度<40%,家长整体评估的整体改善得分>2)的患者按1:1:1:1随机分组,接受为期8周的简短心理社会干预加安慰剂、10毫克/天伏硫西汀、20毫克/天伏硫西汀或20毫克/天氟西汀的双盲治疗。经过预先计划的中期分析后,停止氟西汀组的入组,患者按1:1:1随机分组接受安慰剂、10毫克伏硫西汀或20毫克伏硫西汀治疗。主要终点是伏硫西汀10毫克和20毫克剂量组与安慰剂组从基线到第8周CDRS-R总分的变化。
683名参加单盲导入治疗的患者中,540名被随机分配至双盲期。伏硫西汀10毫克和20毫克剂量组与安慰剂组从随机分组到第8周CDRS-R总分的平均(标准误)变化分别为-19.6(1.2)和-17.5(1.4),平均差值为-2.1(1.2)(双侧P = 0.0937)。总体而言,47%的患者在双盲期报告了治疗中出现的不良事件;恶心是伏硫西汀组最常见的不良事件(11.1%-12.6%)。
安慰剂与伏硫西汀在CDRS-R总分改善方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异;因此,无法证实伏硫西汀治疗儿童重度抑郁症的疗效。安全性和耐受性数据与青少年及成人相似,无突出的安全问题。
伏硫西汀治疗7至11岁重度抑郁症儿科患者的活性对照(氟西汀)固定剂量研究;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02709655 。