Yuda Masami, Takahashi Keita, Ishikawa Yoshitaka, Kurogochi Takanori, Matsumoto Akira, Fukushima Naoko, Masuda Takahiro, Takahashi Naoto, Yano Fumiaki, Eto Ken
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Department of Surgery The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital Chiba Japan.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 Apr 16;9(5):920-925. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70022. eCollection 2025 Sep.
The benefits of intraoperative nerve monitoring for identifying recurrent laryngeal nerves during esophageal cancer surgery have recently been reported. However, no standardized procedures have been established for the use of this system. This study aimed to identify factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and explore approaches to improve the precision and efficiency of intraoperative nerve monitoring in esophageal cancer surgery.
We analyzed 187 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018, of whom 142 underwent intraoperative nerve monitoring. We evaluated factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.
The overall incidence of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was 22% (32/142). Univariate analysis identified the left lateral decubitus position (vs. prone position) and not using video laryngoscope during intubation as risk factors for discrepancies between intraoperative nerve monitoring findings and postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy diagnosis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the left lateral decubitus position (odds ratio: 4.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-13.4, = 0.019) and not using video laryngoscope during intubation (odds ratio: 9.51; 95% confidence interval: 2.94-15.9, = 0.001) were independent risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy diagnostic discrepancies.
Adequate contact between the intubation tube and vocal cord muscles is crucial for effective intraoperative nerve monitoring during esophagectomy. Additionally, the intraoperative posture significantly affects diagnostic outcomes and should be carefully considered.
近期有报道称术中神经监测在食管癌手术中识别喉返神经具有益处。然而,该系统的使用尚未建立标准化程序。本研究旨在确定影响术中神经监测诊断喉返神经麻痹准确性的因素,并探索提高食管癌手术中术中神经监测精度和效率的方法。
我们分析了2011年至2018年间连续接受食管切除术的187例患者,其中142例接受了术中神经监测。我们评估了影响术中神经监测诊断喉返神经麻痹准确性的因素。
术后喉返神经麻痹的总体发生率为22%(32/142)。单因素分析确定左侧卧位(与俯卧位相比)和插管时未使用视频喉镜是术中神经监测结果与术后喉返神经麻痹诊断之间存在差异的危险因素。多因素分析证实,左侧卧位(比值比:4.24;95%置信区间:1.09 - 13.4,P = 0.019)和插管时未使用视频喉镜(比值比:9.51;95%置信区间:2.94 - 15.9,P = 0.001)是喉返神经麻痹诊断差异的独立危险因素。
插管导管与声带肌肉之间的充分接触对于食管切除术中有效的术中神经监测至关重要。此外,术中体位显著影响诊断结果,应予以仔细考虑。