• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估腹腔镜能量设备的人体工程学方面:一项调查与一项运动学实验的结合

Evaluating the ergonomic aspects of laparoscopic energy devices: combination of a survey and a kinesiologic experiment.

作者信息

Sohn Hee Ju, Song Junkyung, Choi Yoo Shin, Han Youngmin, Kwon Wooil, Park Jaebum, Jang Jin-Young

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12082-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-12082-9
PMID:40926158
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate surgeons' ergonomic satisfaction when using laparoscopic energy devices and to investigate how prolonged use affects muscle fatigue and surgical performance.

METHODS

A two-part study, including a survey and a kinesiologic experiment, was conducted to compare 4 laparoscopic energy devices (D1-D4). Thirty surgeons completed a structured survey assessing ergonomic factors such as device weight, grip strength, handle design, comfort, and trigger location. In parallel, a kinesiologic experiment involving 20 surgeons measured device activation force, surface electromyography (EMG) changes, and targeting accuracy before and after fatigue induction using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

The survey revealed significant ergonomic differences among devices. In the kinesiologic study, two devices showed a significant decline in precision and targeting accuracy after fatigue. All but one device demonstrated significant changes in the median frequency (MDF) and integrated EMG (iEMG) of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle (P < 0.001), indicating muscle fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged use of certain laparoscopic energy devices induces muscle fatigue and impairs accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of ergonomic considerations in surgical instrument design to enhance surgeon performance and reduce fatigue-related risks.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估外科医生使用腹腔镜能量设备时的人体工程学满意度,并调查长时间使用如何影响肌肉疲劳和手术表现。

方法

进行了一项分为两部分的研究,包括一项调查和一项运动学实验,以比较4种腹腔镜能量设备(D1-D4)。30名外科医生完成了一项结构化调查,评估了诸如设备重量、握力、手柄设计、舒适度和扳机位置等人体工程学因素。同时,一项涉及20名外科医生的运动学实验,使用标准化方案测量了疲劳诱导前后的设备激活力、表面肌电图(EMG)变化和靶向准确性。

结果

调查显示不同设备之间存在显著的人体工程学差异。在运动学研究中,两种设备在疲劳后精度和靶向准确性显著下降。除一种设备外,所有设备的指浅屈肌的中位频率(MDF)和积分肌电图(iEMG)均有显著变化(P < 0.001),表明存在肌肉疲劳。

结论

长时间使用某些腹腔镜能量设备会导致肌肉疲劳并损害准确性。这些发现强调了在手术器械设计中考虑人体工程学的重要性,以提高外科医生的表现并降低与疲劳相关的风险。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the ergonomic aspects of laparoscopic energy devices: combination of a survey and a kinesiologic experiment.评估腹腔镜能量设备的人体工程学方面:一项调查与一项运动学实验的结合
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12082-9.
2
The future of wearable ergonomic devices in plastic surgery: A systematic review.整形外科中可穿戴人体工程学设备的未来:一项系统综述。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 May;104:85-101. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.007. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
3
Ergonomic stress and surgical performance of general surgeons: a cross-sectional comparison of laparoscopic and open procedures.普通外科医生的人体工程学压力与手术表现:腹腔镜手术与开放手术的横断面比较
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Sep 5;410(1):265. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03780-y.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Training Laparoscopic Surgeons: Assessing Workload and Skill Using Nasa-Tlx.培训腹腔镜外科医生:使用美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数评估工作量和技能
J Surg Educ. 2025 Sep;82(9):103588. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103588. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
6
Passive Exoskeletons During Live Surgeries: Supporting Forward Head Postures Among Veterinary Surgeons.活体手术中的被动外骨骼:支持兽医外科医生的头部前倾姿势。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):32-39. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2024.2411552. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
7
Can Repetition-based Training in a High-fidelity Model Enhance Critical Trauma Surgical Skills Among Trainees and Attending Surgeons Equally?在高保真模型中基于重复的训练能否同样提高实习医生和主治医生的关键创伤手术技能?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):330-339. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003225. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
8
Should All Minimal Access Surgery Be Robot-Assisted? A Systematic Review into the Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Demands of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.所有微创手术都应采用机器人辅助吗?对腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的肌肉骨骼及认知需求的系统评价。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul;26(7):1520-1530. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05319-8. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
9
Real-Time Postural Feedback to Optimize Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Health in Ophthalmology Residents: A Canadian Pilot Quality Improvement Study.实时姿势反馈以优化眼科住院医师的人体工程学和肌肉骨骼健康:一项加拿大试点质量改进研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 25;17(7):e88736. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88736. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
Helping Surgeons' Hands: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Ergonomic Instruments.帮助外科医生的手:对符合人体工程学的器械的生物力学评估。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Sep;49(9):933.e1-933.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender equity in surgical instruments: ergonomics of ring-handled forceps.手术器械中的性别公平:指环式钳子的人机工程学。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2024 Feb;33(1):21-28. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2023.2261533. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
2
Ergonomic Assessment of Surgeon Characteristics and Laparoscopic Device Strain in Gynecologic Surgery.妇科手术中外科医生特征与腹腔镜设备应变的人体工程学评估
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Dec;29(12):1357-1363. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.552. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Investigation of the Association between Surgeon Sex and Laparoscopic Device Ergonomic Strain in Gynecologic Surgery.
妇科手术中外科医生性别与腹腔镜设备人体工程学应变之间关联的调查。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Aug;29(8):984-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.04.019. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.腹腔镜与机器人手术的人机工程学风险比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8397-8402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09105-0. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
5
Assessment of muscle activity and fatigue during laparoscopic surgery.评估腹腔镜手术中的肌肉活动和疲劳。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6672-6678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08937-6. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
6
Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of live laparoscopic surgery.虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器训练可提高活体腹腔镜手术的绩效。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):313-319. doi: 10.1111/ases.13005. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
The Rise of Minimally Invasive Surgery: 16 Year Analysis of the Progressive Replacement of Open Surgery with Laparoscopy.微创外科的兴起:腹腔镜手术逐渐取代开放性手术的 16 年分析。
JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00076.
8
Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels.不同经验水平下腹腔镜和机器人手术任务表现的人机工程学分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1938-1943. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6478-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.微创外科的工效学:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术之间手术室肌肉用力与疲劳的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2323-2331. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6515-3. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
10
Measuring fatigue and stress in laparoscopic surgery: validity and reliability of the star-track test.测量腹腔镜手术中的疲劳和应激:星轨测试的效度与信度
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019 Feb;28(1):57-64. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1470984. Epub 2018 May 15.