• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后功能缺失等位基因急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效与安全性:基于全球急性冠状动脉事件注册评分

Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome patients with loss-of-function alleles after percutaneous coronary intervention: based on the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score.

作者信息

Dang Dan, Li Jing, Li Yi, Qiu Miaohan, Wang Bin, Qi Bin, Han Yaling

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Disease, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.

The Department of Cardiology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Aug 7;9(6):102997. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102997. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102997
PMID:40926880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414895/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The selection of P2Y12 inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial among East Asian patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor selection for the East Asian population carrying loss-of-function (LOF) alleles based on the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score.

METHODS

Between March 2016 and March 2019, a cohort of 8683 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome who survived PCI were enrolled in this study. All patients carried the LOF allele and could calculate GRACE scores. The primary outcome was ischemic events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the components of the primary outcome, all-cause mortality, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, and 5 bleeding events, and BARC types 3 and 5 bleeding events. The propensity score matching method was used to balance the baseline characteristics of patients. The Kaplan-Meier/log-rank test was adopted for the result analysis, and Cox regression was employed for adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The low-risk group comprised 5496 patients (63.3%), while the intermediate- to high-risk group included 3187 patients (36.7%) in the study population stratified by GRACE scores. The follow-up results revealed that in patients at low risk, clopidogrel and ticagrelor had comparable effects in preventing ischemic events. However, ticagrelor use was associated with a higher risk of BARC types 2, 3, and 5 bleeding events (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; 95% CI, 1.43-3.02; < .001) and BARC types 3 and 5 bleeding events (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.57-4.63; < .001) compared with clopidogrel use. In patients at intermediate to high risk, ticagrelor treatment was associated with a lower risk of stroke (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.82; = .026), while the risk of ischemic events or bleeding was comparable between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data on East Asian patients with LOF alleles suggest that GRACE risk stratification may help differentiate ischemic and bleeding risks post-PCI.

摘要

背景

在东亚患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性冠状动脉综合征患者的P2Y12抑制剂选择仍存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在基于全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)评分,为携带功能丧失(LOF)等位基因的东亚人群确定最佳的P2Y12抑制剂选择。

方法

2016年3月至2019年3月,本研究纳入了8683例诊断为急性冠状动脉综合征且PCI术后存活的患者。所有患者均携带LOF等位基因且可计算GRACE评分。主要结局为12个月内的缺血事件(心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和缺血性卒中)。次要结局包括主要结局的组成部分、全因死亡率、出血学术研究联盟(BARC)2型、3型和5型出血事件以及BARC 3型和5型出血事件。采用倾向评分匹配法平衡患者的基线特征。结果分析采用Kaplan-Meier/对数秩检验,采用Cox回归调整混杂因素。

结果

在根据GRACE评分分层的研究人群中,低风险组包括5496例患者(63.3%),中高风险组包括3187例患者(36.7%)。随访结果显示,在低风险患者中,氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛在预防缺血事件方面效果相当。然而,与使用氯吡格雷相比,使用替格瑞洛与更高的BARC 2型、3型和5型出血事件风险(风险比[HR],2.08;95%可信区间[CI],1.43-3.02;P<0.001)以及BARC 3型和5型出血事件风险(HR,2.69;95%CI,1.57-4.63;P<0.001)相关。在中高风险患者中,替格瑞洛治疗与较低的卒中风险相关(HR,0.18;95%CI,0.04-0.82;P=0.026),而两个治疗组之间的缺血事件或出血风险相当。

结论

这些关于携带LOF等位基因的东亚患者的真实世界数据表明,GRACE风险分层可能有助于区分PCI术后的缺血和出血风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/4db992a9f61a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/d883623029e8/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/948a0b9ac55c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/2238a9ec67a5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/48bf01bedb9b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/4db992a9f61a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/d883623029e8/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/948a0b9ac55c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/2238a9ec67a5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/48bf01bedb9b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be1/12414895/4db992a9f61a/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome patients with loss-of-function alleles after percutaneous coronary intervention: based on the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score.氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后功能缺失等位基因急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效与安全性:基于全球急性冠状动脉事件注册评分
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Aug 7;9(6):102997. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102997. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.吲哚布芬与阿司匹林用于老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的比较
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04843-0.
3
Deescalation From Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel for Myocardial Infarction With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.从替格瑞洛降阶梯至氯吡格雷用于慢性肾脏病合并心肌梗死:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2511297. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11297.
4
Rationale and design of randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy with dual antiplatelet therapy in chronic coronary syndrome patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (TICALONE-TAHA10 Protocol).比较替格瑞洛单药治疗与双重抗血小板治疗在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性的随机非劣效性临床试验的原理与设计(TICALONE-TAHA10方案)
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0325663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325663. eCollection 2025.
5
Comparison between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles coronary artery disease and stroke patients: a meta-analysis.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛在CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因冠心病和中风患者中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03860-4.
6
Effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor based on the ABCD-GENE score in acute coronary syndrome patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.基于ABCD-GENE评分比较氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的有效性。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 11;16:1606327. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1606327. eCollection 2025.
7
Effectiveness of Clopidogrel vs Alternative P2Y Inhibitors Based on the ABCD-GENE Score.ABCD-GENE 评分指导的氯吡格雷与其他 P2Y12 抑制剂的疗效比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Apr 16;83(15):1370-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.015.
8
Outcomes of Ticagrelor Versus High-dose Clopidogrel in CYP2C19 Intermediate Metabolizer Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛与高剂量氯吡格雷在 CYP2C19 中间代谢物经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠脉综合征患者中的疗效比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 1;84(3):347-355. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001582.
9
A Comparative Study on Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的比较研究
J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jul;63(7):776-783. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2239. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.普拉格雷(Efient®)联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(TA182综述):系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Testing for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.基因检测用于口服 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2024 Aug 6;150(6):e129-e150. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001257. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
3
Contemporary Use of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A GRACE Risk Score Stratification-Based Analysis in a Large-Scale, Real-World Study From China.
替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的当代应用:来自中国一项大规模真实世界研究中基于 GRACE 风险评分分层的分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Jul;98(7):1021-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.02.004.
4
Clinical Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Clopidogrel-Based Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 CYP2C19 基因型对氯吡格雷为基础的抗血小板治疗的临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):829-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.363. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
5
External validation of the GRACE risk score and the risk-treatment paradox in patients with acute coronary syndrome.GRACE 风险评分在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的外部验证及风险-治疗悖论。
Open Heart. 2022 Mar;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001984.
6
Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diverse Clinical Settings.不同临床环境下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的基因分型指导抗血小板治疗
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e024159. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024159. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Therapy: 2022 Update.临床药物遗传学实施联盟 CYP2C19 基因型和氯吡格雷治疗指南:2022 更新版。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Nov;112(5):959-967. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2526. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
8
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e4-e17. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
10
ICD-11: an international classification of diseases for the twenty-first century.《国际疾病分类第 11 次修订本》:二十一世纪的国际疾病分类。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 9;21(Suppl 6):206. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01534-6.