Liu Jinping, Sheng Zhimin, Guo Feihe, Lin Xiao, Xu Li, Sun Lihong, Qian Xiaowei
Department of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Wenling Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Taizhou, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Sep 2;19:7571-7580. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S535671. eCollection 2025.
Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension can cause detrimental effects on both the mother and the fetus, and it remains a significant concern in obstetric anesthesia. The use of vasopressors is considered the most reliable and effective approach. Previous studies have shown that norepinephrine appears to be superior to phenylephrine in maintaining maternal heart rate and cardiac output. Therefore, we hypothesize that norepinephrine is more effective than phenylephrine in maintaining neonatal cerebral perfusion when used to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.
This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial. We enrolled 216 singleton parturients who were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. The patients received a prophylactic intravenous infusion of either norepinephrine (0.08 μg/kg/min) or phenylephrine (0.5 μg/kg/min). Maternal cardiac output was not routinely monitored during the study period. Fetal ultrasound examinations were performed, with blood velocity measured in the middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery, and the cerebroplacental ratio calculated.
Ninety subjects were ultimately analyzed in each group. The changes in blood velocity in the middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery, as well as the calculated cerebroplacental ratio at 3 and 6 minutes after spinal anesthesia, did not differ significantly between the two groups. The estimated difference of ΔCPR in two groups was - 0.01 (95% CI, -0.05-0.02, P = 0.491) at 3 minutes and was 0.02 (95% CI, -0.01-0.07, P = 0.204) at 6 minutes.
Prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine or phenylephrine at comparable doses has similar effects on fetal cerebral perfusion.
脊髓麻醉诱导的低血压可对母亲和胎儿产生有害影响,仍是产科麻醉中的一个重大问题。使用血管升压药被认为是最可靠、最有效的方法。先前的研究表明,在维持母体心率和心输出量方面,去甲肾上腺素似乎优于去氧肾上腺素。因此,我们假设,在用于预防脊髓麻醉诱导的低血压时,去甲肾上腺素在维持新生儿脑灌注方面比去氧肾上腺素更有效。
本研究是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机试验。我们纳入了216名单胎产妇,她们计划进行择期剖宫产。患者接受预防性静脉输注去甲肾上腺素(0.08μg/kg/分钟)或去氧肾上腺素(0.5μg/kg/分钟)。在研究期间,未常规监测母体心输出量。进行胎儿超声检查,测量大脑中动脉和脐动脉的血流速度,并计算脑胎盘比率。
每组最终分析90名受试者。脊髓麻醉后3分钟和6分钟时,两组大脑中动脉和脐动脉的血流速度变化以及计算出的脑胎盘比率无显著差异。两组在3分钟时ΔCPR的估计差异为-0.01(95%CI,-0.05-0.02,P=0.491),在6分钟时为0.02(95%CI,-0.01-0.07,P=0.204)。
预防性输注同等剂量的去甲肾上腺素或去氧肾上腺素对胎儿脑灌注的影响相似。