Kraus Moritz, Bocea Bogdan, Ion Nicolas, Dhillon Mehar, Zderic Ivan, Puls Luise, Gueorguiev Boyko, Richards R Geoff, Pape Hans-Christoph, Pastor Tatjana, Pastor Torsten
AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Sep 10;145(1):444. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06040-2.
Distal triceps tendon rupture is related to high complication rates with up to 25% failures. Elbow stiffness is another severe complication, as the traditional approach considers prolonged immobilization to ensure tendon healing. Recently, a dynamic tape was designed, implementing a silicone-infused core for braid shortening and preventing repair elongation during mobilization, thus maintaining constant tissue approximation. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanically the novel dynamic tape versus conventional tape in a human cadaveric distal triceps tendon repair model.
Sixteen paired arms from eight donors were split to two groups. Distal triceps tendon tenotomies and repairs were performed via the crossed transosseous locking Krackow stitch technique for anatomic footprint repair. Either conventional (SutureTape) or the novel dynamic tape (DYNATape) were used. A postoperative protocol mimicking intense early rehabilitation was simulated by a 9-day, 300-cycle daily mobilization under 150 N load followed by a final destructive test.
Significant differences were identified between the groups regarding the displacement over time at the distal, intermediate, and proximal tendon aspects, p < 0.001. DYNATape demonstrated significantly less displacement compared to SutureTape (4.6 ± 1.2 mm versus 7.8 ± 2.1 mm) and higher load to failure (637 ± 113 N versus 341 ± 230 N), p ≤ 0.037. DYNATape retracted 0.95 ± 1.95 mm after each 24-hour period and withstood the whole cyclic loading sequence without failure. In contrast, SutureTape failed early in three specimens.
DYNATape demonstrated improved biomechanical competence compared to SutureTape in a distal triceps tendon repair model, with significantly lower maximal displacement and higher load to failure. These findings indicate that DYNATape may offer a more stable construct under controlled laboratory conditions. Knot slippage and bone-related complications observed in both groups underscore the technical challenges associated with this repair technique and highlight the importance of precise surgical execution.
肱三头肌远端肌腱断裂与高并发症发生率相关,失败率高达25%。肘关节僵硬是另一种严重并发症,因为传统方法认为需要长时间固定以确保肌腱愈合。最近,设计了一种动态胶带,其采用注入硅胶的芯来缩短编织物并防止在活动期间修复部位伸长,从而保持组织持续接近。本研究的目的是在人体尸体肱三头肌远端肌腱修复模型中对新型动态胶带与传统胶带进行生物力学比较。
来自8名供体的16对上肢被分为两组。通过交叉骨内锁定Krackow缝合法进行肱三头肌远端肌腱切断术和修复,以修复解剖足迹。使用传统胶带(缝合胶带)或新型动态胶带(DYNATape)。通过在150 N负荷下进行为期9天、每天300次循环的活动来模拟模仿早期强化康复的术后方案,随后进行最终的破坏性测试。
两组在肌腱远端、中间和近端随时间的位移方面存在显著差异,p < 0.001。与缝合胶带相比,DYNATape的位移明显更小(4.6±1.2 mm对7.8±2.1 mm),且失败负荷更高(637±113 N对341±230 N),p≤0.037。DYNATape在每个24小时周期后回缩0.95±1.95 mm,并承受了整个循环加载序列而未失败。相比之下,缝合胶带在三个标本中早期就失败了。
在肱三头肌远端肌腱修复模型中,与缝合胶带相比,DYNATape表现出更好的生物力学性能,最大位移显著更低,失败负荷更高。这些发现表明,在受控的实验室条件下,DYNATape可能提供更稳定的结构。两组中均观察到的结滑动和与骨相关的并发症强调了与这种修复技术相关的技术挑战,并突出了精确手术操作的重要性。