• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂普通外科肿瘤学 fellowship 的现场面试和虚拟面试:申请人视角

In-Person and Virtual Interviews for Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship: An Applicant's Perspective.

作者信息

Dineen Sean P, Berman Russell, Blazer Dan, Fahy Bridget, Grignol Valerie, Foshag Leland, Lai Lily, Ongchin Melanie, Reddy Sanjay, Saied Abdul, Scally Christopher, Russell Maria

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18247-z.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-18247-z
PMID:40928577
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus pandemic forced a rapid adoption of electronic education platforms, including a virtual approach for the Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) interviews from 2020 to 2023. In 2024, the SSO recommended a return to in-person interviews when possible. The aim of this study was to survey the applicant perspectives of this approach to the 2024 CGSO Interviews.

METHODS

Following the 2024 Match, a survey was circulated to matched applicants, which included 31 questions. The survey was voluntary, anonymous and no compensation was offered.

RESULTS

55 applicants responded, representing a response rate of 75.3%. Applicants applied to a median of 30 programs and interviewed at 13. Regarding preference of approach, 80% of applicants indicated that they preferred in-person interviews over virtual (44/55). 74.5% of applicants indicating that they thought the cost of in-person interviews was "worth it". When asked if they felt they could "adequately represent themselves in an in-person interview", 95% affirmed they could; compared to 67% when asked the same question for the virtual approach. Most applicants, 70.1%, felt that programs interviewing virtually were at a disadvantage. The interview affected an applicants' rank list to either "a great extent" or "to some extent" 96% of the time.

CONCLUSION

The responses to our survey indicate a preference for in-person interviews despite the cost. The benefits of identifying the culture of a program were felt to warrant the financial expense and time away from training. There are limitations to the study, but these results support the adoption of in-person interviews.

摘要

背景

冠状病毒大流行迫使迅速采用电子教育平台,包括在2020年至2023年期间对复杂普通外科肿瘤学(CGSO)面试采用虚拟方式。2024年,外科肿瘤学会(SSO)建议尽可能恢复面对面面试。本研究的目的是调查申请者对2024年CGSO面试这种方式的看法。

方法

在2024年面试匹配之后,向匹配的申请者发放了一份包含31个问题的调查问卷。该调查是自愿、匿名的,且不提供报酬。

结果

55名申请者回复,回复率为75.3%。申请者平均申请了30个项目,参加了13次面试。关于面试方式的偏好,80%的申请者表示他们更喜欢面对面面试而非虚拟面试(44/55)。74.5%的申请者表示他们认为面对面面试的成本“物有所值”。当被问及是否觉得自己能“在面对面面试中充分展现自己”时,95%的人肯定了这一点;而对于虚拟面试方式问同样问题时,这一比例为67%。大多数申请者(70.1%)认为采用虚拟面试的项目处于劣势。面试在很大程度上或在一定程度上影响了96%的申请者的排名顺序。

结论

我们的调查结果表明,尽管成本较高,但申请者更喜欢面对面面试。他们认为了解项目文化的好处值得付出经济成本和耽误培训的时间。本研究存在局限性,但这些结果支持采用面对面面试。

相似文献

1
In-Person and Virtual Interviews for Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship: An Applicant's Perspective.复杂普通外科肿瘤学 fellowship 的现场面试和虚拟面试:申请人视角
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18247-z.
2
General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day.普通外科住院医师申请人对可选第二观察日实施的替代住院医师面试模式的看法。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Nov;81(11):1784-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
3
Comparison of In-Person and Virtual Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency Interviews from the Applicant's Perspective.从申请人角度比较面对面和虚拟的血管外科住院医师综合面试
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Sep;118:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.04.117. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
4
Analysis of the 2024 Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Match: Survey of Applicants' and Program Directors' Preferences Regarding In-Person Versus Virtual Interviews.2024年乳腺外科肿瘤学专科医师匹配分析:关于面对面面试与虚拟面试的申请人及项目主任偏好调查
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18043-9.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Assessment of Applicant and Program Director Attitudes Toward a Hybrid Approach to Urology Residency Interviews.评估申请人和项目主任对泌尿外科住院医师面试混合方法的态度。
Urology. 2025 Aug;202:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.04.049. Epub 2025 May 7.
7
Not From Around Here: Evaluation of In-Person Interviews in an Urban General Surgery Residency Program.非本地生源:城市普通外科住院医师培训项目中实地访谈评估。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Dec;81(12):103283. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.002. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Virtual and In-Person Interview Offerings in the General Surgery Residency Application Cycle: A How-to Hybrid.普通外科住院医师申请周期中的虚拟面试和现场面试安排:混合面试指南
Am Surg. 2025 Aug 12:31348251367047. doi: 10.1177/00031348251367047.
10
Applicant Preferences and Perspectives in the New Era of the Urology Residency Match.泌尿外科住院医师匹配新时代下的申请人偏好与观点
Urology. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.06.069.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Residency Applicant Preferences for Continuing Virtual Interviews: A National Database Analysis.住院医师申请人对持续虚拟面试偏好的评估:一项全国性数据库分析。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Feb;17(1):63-70. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00478.1. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Cost of the Urology Application Process.新冠疫情对泌尿外科申请流程成本的影响
Urology. 2024 Dec;194:340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.052. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
Examining the Aftermath of Virtual Interviewing on Surgical Residency Matches.
审视虚拟面试对外科住院医师匹配的后续影响。
J Surg Res. 2024 Sep;301:492-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.06.028. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
4
Virtual Interviews in the Post-COVID-19 Emergency Era: Insights from the Gastroenterology Fellowship Applicants and Programs.后 COVID-19 紧急时期的虚拟面试:来自胃肠病学研究员申请人和项目的见解。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Sep;69(9):3156-3164. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08551-1. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
5
Comparing Perceptions of Virtual and In-Person Interviews: Results From a National Survey of Internal Medicine Residents.比较虚拟和现场访谈的看法:一项全国内科住院医师调查的结果。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Jun;16(3):296-302. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00805.1. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
6
Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties.外科亚专科住院医师选拔中对应用和面试上限的看法。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Aug;81(8):1013-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 May 16.
7
Virtual Interviews Are Not Adequate Replacements for In-Person Interviews for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Program Directors and Applicants.对于骨科运动医学专科培训项目主任和申请者而言,虚拟面试不足以替代面对面面试。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec 20;6(1):100835. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100835. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
In-Person vs Virtual Interview Format for Fellowships in Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Survey of Fellows-in-Training.心血管疾病 fellowship 项目的面对面面试与虚拟面试形式:一项针对培训学员的全国性调查
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;82(5):465-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.039.
9
The Carbon Footprint and Cost of Virtual Residency Interviews.虚拟居住面试的碳足迹和成本。
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Feb;15(1):112-116. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00229.1.
10
Lessons learned and keys to success: Provider experiences during the implementation of virtual oncology tumor boards in the era of COVID-19.经验教训和成功关键:COVID-19 时代虚拟肿瘤委员会实施期间提供者的体验。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(4):570-576. doi: 10.1002/jso.26784. Epub 2022 Jan 7.