Creighton University School of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona.
Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.
J Surg Educ. 2024 Dec;81(12):103283. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.002. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
This study used a program evaluation approach to investigate the perceptions of utilizing in-person applicant interviews for a general surgery residency program.
The study utilized de-identified data routinely collected during the residency program applicant interviews in the General Surgery Residency Program during the fall of 2023. Applicant and faculty/resident exit interview questionnaires were developed to evaluate perceptions of in-person interviewing; the questions were informed by domains for considering the appropriateness and feasibility of continuing in-person interviews as identified by the institution's Graduate Medical Education Committee. Applicants completed the survey at the end of their interview day; faculty and resident interviewers completed the survey following the applicant rank meeting.
The Sponsoring Institution approved a pilot transition from virtual to in-person interviews for the General Surgery Residency Program 2023 recruitment cycle. Surveys were completed electronically.
Sixty-four applicants were interviewed and requested to complete the exit survey. The survey was completed by 55 (Response rate = 86%) program applicants and eight (Response rate = 100%) faculty and residents in the program.
49.1% of applicants indicated a preference for in-person interviews, 40.0% of applicants indicated a preference to choose and only 10.9% indicated a preference for virtual interviews. Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher preference for in-person interviews than those from in-state. Applicants and faculty interviewers perceived in-person interviews to provide a strong assessment of applicants. Applicants from out-of-state had a significantly higher confidence in their ability to demonstrate their strength and assess fit than those from in-state.
While most applicants and faculty interviewers were generally comfortable with an in-person interviewing format, applicants from out-of-state had a particularly high preference for and perception of in-person interviews. General surgery residency programs and sponsoring institutions would benefit from the development of a comprehensive program evaluation strategies for their residency program interviews to make evidence-informed decisions about how best to structure interviews for their programs.
本研究采用项目评估方法,调查了对普通外科住院医师项目进行面对面申请人面试的看法。
本研究利用了 2023 年秋季普通外科住院医师项目中常规收集的住院医师项目申请人面试期间的匿名数据。为了评估面对面面试的看法,制定了申请人和教师/住院医师离职面试问卷;这些问题是根据机构研究生医学教育委员会确定的继续进行面对面面试的适当性和可行性的领域来确定的。申请人在面试日结束时完成调查;教师和住院医师面试官在申请人排名会议后完成调查。
主办机构批准 2023 年普通外科住院医师项目招聘周期从虚拟面试过渡到面对面面试的试点项目。调查以电子方式完成。
共有 64 名申请人接受面试,并要求完成离职调查。共有 55 名(回应率=86%)项目申请人和 8 名(回应率=100%)项目中的教师和住院医师完成了调查。
49.1%的申请人表示更喜欢面对面面试,40.0%的申请人表示更喜欢选择,只有 10.9%的申请人表示更喜欢虚拟面试。来自州外的申请人比来自州内的申请人更倾向于面对面面试。申请人和教师面试官认为面对面面试可以对申请人进行强有力的评估。来自州外的申请人比来自州内的申请人更有信心展示自己的实力并评估适合度。
虽然大多数申请人和教师面试官对面对面的面试形式普遍感到满意,但来自州外的申请人特别倾向于并认为面对面面试效果更好。普通外科住院医师项目和主办机构将受益于制定全面的住院医师项目面试方案评估策略,以便就如何最好地为其项目构建面试做出基于证据的决策。