Burghgraef Thijs A, Amelung Femke J, Kertzman Bas A J, Draaisma Werner A, Verdaasdonk Emiel G G, Verheijen Paul M, Consten Esther C J
Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
JAMA Surg. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.3445.
Stoma reversal is associated with few complications. However, recent studies show that 1 in 3 patients develop an incisional hernia, for which half of the patients receive surgical correction.
To investigate whether prophylactic synthetic mesh placement in the retromuscular space during stoma reversal reduces the rate of stomal site incisional hernias.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, parallel, single-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted between July 2018 and June 2023 and took place at 2 large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Data were analyzed from September 2024 and April 2025. Patients who underwent elective stoma reversal were included. Exclusion criteria included connective tissue disease, intraperitoneal dialysis, immunodeficiency, previous mesh placement within 3 cm of the stoma closure site, allergy or contraindication for mesh, pregnancy, and inflammatory bowel disease, as indication for initial stoma construction. Follow-up was at 30 days and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperative.
Conventional stoma closure (n = 40) vs stoma closure with preventive synthetic mesh placement in the retromuscular space (n = 39).
The primary outcome measure was radiological stoma site incisional hernia after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, surgical site infections, and quality of life (measured by EuroQoL 5-Dimension, visual analog scale, 36-item short form survey, and hernia-related quality of life).
A total of 88 patients were randomized to either conventional stoma closure (n = 44) or synthetic mesh-reinforced stoma closure (n = 44). At 12 months, 39 patients in the control group and 40 patients in the mesh group had completed follow-up. The rate of stoma site incisional hernia was 17.9% (n = 7) in the conventional group vs 0% (n = 0) in the mesh group (relative risk, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.034-0.330; P = .02) with a number needed to treat of 6. There was no significant difference in surgical site infections or postoperative complications. Hernia-related quality of life was significantly better at 12 months follow-up in the mesh group.
In this study, placement of a prophylactic synthetic mesh in the retromuscular space prevented stoma site incisional hernias. Patients receiving a synthetic mesh experienced a better hernia-related quality of life. To prevent stoma site incisional hernias, the placement of a synthetic mesh during stoma reversal should be considered.
Dutch Trial Register: NL-OMON27268.
造口回纳术相关并发症较少。然而,近期研究表明,三分之一的患者会发生切口疝,其中半数患者接受了手术矫正。
探讨在造口回纳术中于肌后间隙预防性放置合成补片是否能降低造口部位切口疝的发生率。
设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性、平行、单盲随机临床试验于2018年7月至2023年6月在荷兰的2家大型教学医院进行。2024年9月至2025年4月进行数据分析。纳入接受择期造口回纳术的患者。排除标准包括结缔组织病、腹膜透析、免疫缺陷、造口闭合部位3厘米内既往有补片植入史、对补片过敏或有补片禁忌证、妊娠以及作为初始造口构建指征的炎症性肠病。术后30天及3、6、9和12个月进行随访。
传统造口闭合术(n = 40)与在肌后间隙预防性放置合成补片的造口闭合术(n = 39)。
主要结局指标是术后12个月时影像学检查的造口部位切口疝。次要结局包括术后并发症、手术部位感染和生活质量(采用欧洲五维健康量表、视觉模拟量表、36项简短问卷调查表以及与疝相关的生活质量进行测量)。
共有88例患者被随机分为传统造口闭合组(n = 44)或合成补片强化造口闭合组(n = 44)。12个月时,对照组3个9例患者和补片组40例患者完成随访。传统组造口部位切口疝发生率为17.9%(n =?),补片组为0%(n = 0)(相对风险,0.18;95%置信区间,0.034 - 0.330;P = 0.02),需治疗人数为6。手术部位感染或术后并发症无显著差异。补片组在12个月随访时与疝相关的生活质量明显更好。
在本研究中,于肌后间隙放置预防性合成补片可预防造口部位切口疝。接受合成补片的患者与疝相关的生活质量更好。为预防造口部位切口疝,应考虑在造口回纳术中放置合成补片。
荷兰试验注册库:NL-OMON27268 。