[Changes in angina threshold induced by administration of ergonovine maleate during pacing in patients with chronic exertional angina].

It is widely accepted that the occurrence of chest pain and/or ST segment elevation during ergonovine testing is a hallmark of abnormal coronary constriction. However, the negativity of this test cannot be considered as an incontrovertible proof of the absence of coronary sensitivity to vasoconstriction. Indeed, it could only indicate that the resulting effect is inadequate to critically reduce coronary blood flow. To test this hypothesis we studied 12 patients with proven coronary artery disease and negative ergonovine test who had complained of chronic exertional angina pectoris and referred variable threshold for the occurrence of pain. They were submitted to atrial pacing (starting from 90 bpm, with 10 bpm increments every 2 min) before (control) and after ergonovine administration (total dose = 0.675 mg). Time, heart rate and rate pressure product were evaluated at the onset of angina and significant ischemia (0.1 mV ST segment depression). After ergonovine, angina was achieved earlier (405 +/- 173 vs 526 +/- 180 sec, p less than 0.005) than during control and at a lower heart rate (116 +/- 15 vs 131 +/- 15 bpm, p less than 0.001) and rate pressure product (15.8 +/- 2.0 vs 18.8 +/- 2.3 X 10(3) U, p less than 0.001). Changes in anginal threshold were widely variable among cases being that the time to onset of pain was dramatically reduced in certain patients but unchanged in one. Similar results were obtained when substituting the ischemic to the anginal threshold. Thus, negativity to ergonovine testing does not imply the absence of coronary constriction which may be revealed when increasing myocardial oxygen demand by atrial pacing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)