Rokkas Theodore, Ekmektzoglou Konstantinos, Tsanou Evangelia, Bricca Ludovica, Menni Alexandra-Eleftheria, Golfakis Paraskevas, Kotzampassi Katerina
Gastroenterology Clinic, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Medical School, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Jan 1;38(1):27-35. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000003062. Epub 2025 Aug 25.
The use of probiotics as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is gaining attention, with recent studies indicating that certain probiotics or combinations may have mental health benefits for patients with IBS.
To systematically review and meta-analyze, using network meta-analysis (NWM), the comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential on quality of life, depression, and anxiety in patients with IBS.
Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed, using a Bayesian NWM, to compare the performance of probiotics with mental health benefits in IBS treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using surfaces under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values.
The analysis included 3154 participants assigned to nine different treatments: Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomyces, Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, Lactobacillus plantarum, probiotic combinations, and placebo. B. longum and probiotic combinations were found to be significantly more effective than placebo. In terms of improving quality of life (QoL), B. longum was the most effective (SUCRA = 89.7%), while L. plantarum was the least effective (SUCRA = 14.9%). For alleviating depression and anxiety, the combination of probiotics (SUCRA = 95.6%) and L. acidophilus (SUCRA = 74.2%) showed the best results, respectively.
Some probiotics or combinations may offer benefits for patients with IBS in improving QoL, depression, and anxiety; however, as this is a developing field, additional research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, and specific strains that may be advantageous. More high-quality RCTs are needed to substantiate these therapeutic possibilities.
益生菌作为肠易激综合征(IBS)的一种治疗方法正受到关注,近期研究表明某些益生菌或其组合可能对IBS患者的心理健康有益。
采用网状Meta分析(NWM)系统评价和Meta分析具有精神调节潜力的益生菌对IBS患者生活质量、抑郁和焦虑的比较疗效及安全性。
使用贝叶斯网状Meta分析对相关随机对照试验(RCT)进行分析,以比较具有心理健康益处的益生菌在IBS治疗中的表现。采用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值评估治疗效果。
分析纳入了3154名参与者,他们被分配到九种不同的治疗组:长双歧杆菌、酿酒酵母、丁酸梭菌、乳酸双歧杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌代田株、植物乳杆菌、益生菌组合和安慰剂。发现长双歧杆菌和益生菌组合比安慰剂显著更有效。在改善生活质量(QoL)方面,长双歧杆菌最有效(SUCRA = 89.7%),而植物乳杆菌最无效(SUCRA = 14.9%)。对于缓解抑郁和焦虑,益生菌组合(SUCRA = 95.6%)和嗜酸乳杆菌(SUCRA = 74.2%)分别显示出最佳效果。
某些益生菌或其组合可能对IBS患者改善QoL、抑郁和焦虑有益;然而,由于这是一个发展中的领域,需要更多研究来充分了解其有效性、潜在机制以及可能具有优势的特定菌株。需要更多高质量的RCT来证实这些治疗可能性。