Suppr超能文献

栓塞性基底动脉闭塞中的椎动脉优势模式:对栓子轨迹的见解

Vertebral Artery Dominance Patterns in Embolic Basilar Artery Occlusion: Insights Toward Embolus Trajectory.

作者信息

Goldman Daryl, Monnig Emery, Mehta Amol, Kellner Christopher P, Mocco J, Fifi Johanna, De Leacy Reade, Shoirah Hazem, Majidi Shahram, Emami Mehrdad, Travis Caton Michael, Shigematsu Tomoyoshi

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuroradiol. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s00062-025-01566-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Embolic basilar artery occlusion (eBAO) is less common than embolic anterior circulation stroke. The anatomic basis for this discrepancy is not understood. Vertebral artery dominance (VAD) correlates with blood flow to the basilar artery. We hypothesized that left VAD is less common in eBAO, as the right vertebral artery is the more proximal to the heart in typical aortic arch anatomy.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center, case-control study identified cases of eBAO. Right, left, and co-dominant (RVAD, LVAD, and CVAD) prevalence was calculated in standardized fashion by CTA. To estimate the VAD prevalence in asymptomatic patients, a systematic review and metanalysis was performed. The pooled estimate of VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic group was compared to the eBAO cohort using χ test.

RESULTS

In total, 72 eBAO were identified in the institutional cohort, and prevalence of LVAD, RVAD, and CVAD was 23.6%, 33.3%, and 43.1% respectively. Systematic review included eight studies and 1813 asymptomatic patients. Mean VAD prevalence in the asymptomatic population was LVAD 47.0% (39.0-55.1%), RVAD 26.9% (22.7-31.5%), and CVAD 25.9% (18.8-34.7%). VAD proportions differed significantly in the eBAO group (p < 0.001), with lower proportion of LVAD (OR 0.37, CI 0.20-0.67, p < 0.001), higher proportion of CVAD (OR 1.89, CI 1.13-3.13, p = 0.01) but no difference in RVAD (1.39, CI 0.81-2.35, p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

LVAD is significantly less common in patients with eBAO compared to asymptomatic patients. Non-LVAD anatomy (RVAD and CVAD) may represent a novel anatomic risk factor for eBAO. This finding could influence techniques for endovascular thrombectomy.

摘要

目的

栓塞性基底动脉闭塞(eBAO)比栓塞性前循环卒中少见。这种差异的解剖学基础尚不清楚。椎动脉优势(VAD)与基底动脉的血流相关。我们推测在eBAO中左椎动脉优势(LVAD)较少见,因为在典型的主动脉弓解剖结构中,右椎动脉更靠近心脏。

方法

这项回顾性单中心病例对照研究确定了eBAO病例。通过CTA以标准化方式计算右、左和共优势(RVAD、LVAD和CVAD)的患病率。为了估计无症状患者的VAD患病率,进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用χ检验将无症状组中VAD患病率的合并估计值与eBAO队列进行比较。

结果

在机构队列中总共确定了72例eBAO,LVAD、RVAD和CVAD的患病率分别为23.6%、33.3%和43.1%。系统评价纳入了8项研究和1813例无症状患者。无症状人群中VAD的平均患病率为LVAD 47.0%(39.0 - 55.1%),RVAD 26.9%(22.7 - 31.5%),CVAD 25.9%(18.8 - 34.7%)。eBAO组的VAD比例有显著差异(p < 0.001),LVAD比例较低(OR 0.37,CI 0.20 - 0.67,p < 0.001),CVAD比例较高(OR 1.89,CI 1.13 - 3.13,p = 0.01),但RVAD无差异(1.39,CI 0.81 - 2.35,p = 0.22)。

结论

与无症状患者相比,eBAO患者中LVAD明显少见。非LVAD解剖结构(RVAD和CVAD)可能是eBAO的一种新的解剖学危险因素。这一发现可能会影响血管内血栓切除术的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验