• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估含癌结肠腺瘤整块息肉切除瘢痕巩固术中全层切除的结果。

Assessing outcomes of full-thickness resection in piecemeal polypectomy scar consolidation of colon adenomas containing cancer.

作者信息

Radosavljevic Ivana, Dam Aamir, Luthra Anjuli K, Pena Luis, Cappelle Saraswathi, Permuth Jennifer B, Felder Seth, Sanchez Julian, Stefanou Amalia, Friedman Mark, Mok Shaffer R

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, United States.

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2025 Sep 1;13:a26372047. doi: 10.1055/a-2637-2047. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1055/a-2637-2047
PMID:40932816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12417760/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The current standard of care for patients who are found to have malignancy within a resected colorectal polyp segment is surgical resection. Our study aimed to illustrate the efficacy and safety of using endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) to achieve histologically complete (R0) resection and formal staging in malignant polypectomy scars.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective case series of 14 patients who underwent scar consolidation via EFTR following piecemeal polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of a malignant colorectal polyp. Variables collected assessed R0 resection, technical success of the procedure, residual disease within the scar, recurrence during follow up, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Of the 14 patient cases reviewed, there was 100% technical success and residual malignancy (RM) found in 14%. Of the two patients with residual disease, one achieved R0 resection with EFTR whereas the other did not and subsequently underwent surgery with no histopathological evidence of malignancy in the resected tissue. There was one AE of rectal bleeding that did not require any surgical intervention or blood transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

EFTR could offer endoscopists a safe, efficacious, and minimally invasive mechanism for formal tumor (T) staging of malignancies found within polypectomy segments. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to assess outcomes in patients with residual neoplastic disease.

摘要

背景与研究目的

对于在切除的大肠息肉段发现恶性肿瘤的患者,目前的标准治疗方法是手术切除。我们的研究旨在阐明使用内镜全层切除术(EFTR)在恶性息肉切除术后瘢痕中实现组织学完全(R0)切除和准确分期的有效性和安全性。

患者与方法

这是一项前瞻性病例系列研究,纳入了14例患者,这些患者在进行恶性大肠息肉的分块息肉切除术或内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)后,通过EFTR进行瘢痕巩固。收集的变量包括R0切除、手术技术成功率、瘢痕内残留疾病、随访期间的复发情况以及不良事件(AE)。

结果

在回顾的14例患者中,手术技术成功率为100%,14%发现有残留恶性肿瘤(RM)。在两名有残留疾病的患者中,一名通过EFTR实现了R0切除,而另一名未实现,随后接受了手术,切除组织中无恶性肿瘤的组织病理学证据。有1例直肠出血不良事件,无需任何手术干预或输血。

结论

EFTR可为内镜医师提供一种安全、有效且微创的机制,用于对息肉切除段内发现的恶性肿瘤进行准确的肿瘤(T)分期。需要进一步开展更大样本量的研究来评估有残留肿瘤疾病患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Assessing outcomes of full-thickness resection in piecemeal polypectomy scar consolidation of colon adenomas containing cancer.评估含癌结肠腺瘤整块息肉切除瘢痕巩固术中全层切除的结果。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Sep 1;13:a26372047. doi: 10.1055/a-2637-2047. eCollection 2025.
2
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.结直肠癌的化学预防:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(32):1-206. doi: 10.3310/hta14320.
3
General Versus Interventional Gastroenterologists: A Comparative Analysis of Follow-Up Outcomes After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colorectal Polyps.普通胃肠病学家与介入性胃肠病学家:大肠息肉内镜黏膜切除术后随访结果的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Dec 26;16(12):e76415. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76415. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia: Meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗残留或复发性结直肠肿瘤的有效性和安全性:Meta分析
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 1;13:a26060982. doi: 10.1055/a-2606-0982. eCollection 2025.
5
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Appropriate and Tailored Polypectomy: Expert Review.美国胃肠病学会关于适当和个体化息肉切除术的临床实践更新:专家综述
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;22(3):470-479.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
7
Retrospective study comparing rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with and without Foley catheter drainage tube placement.比较放置与未放置 Foley 导尿管引流管的直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的回顾性研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 1;13:a26317694. doi: 10.1055/a-2631-7694. eCollection 2025.
8
Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness resection for large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下黏膜切除术联合全层切除术治疗大肠大息肉:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul;59(7):798-807. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2349641. Epub 2024 May 7.
9
Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜全层切除术治疗结直肠病变:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:440-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
Histology of colonic submucosal lesions reveals a high proportion of benign lesions that do not require R0 en bloc endoscopic resection.结肠黏膜下病变的组织学检查显示,大部分良性病变无需进行R0整块内镜切除。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 24;13:a26415256. doi: 10.1055/a-2641-5256. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors: Japanese multicenter prospective C-NET STUDY.结直肠神经内分泌肿瘤内镜切除的短期疗效:日本多中心前瞻性 C-NET 研究。
Dig Endosc. 2024 Aug;36(8):942-951. doi: 10.1111/den.14728. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic full-thickness resection for challenging colorectal lesions: Must we choose?内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜全层切除术治疗具有挑战性的结直肠病变:我们必须做出选择吗?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Dec;98(6):998-999. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.012.
3
Recurrence rate after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of <20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: should we worry about the risk?
<20mm 无蒂结直肠病变内镜黏膜分片切除术的复发率:我们是否应该担心风险?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar;59(3):361-368. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2278425. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
4
Full-thickness resection device for management of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice: Systematic review and meta-analysis.用于处理累及阑尾开口病变的全层切除装置:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Oct 6;11(9):E899-E907. doi: 10.1055/a-2131-4891. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜切除大肠大息肉后的复发率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 7;28(29):4007-4018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.4007.
6
Long-term Outcomes After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Trial From Japan.日本一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究:内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗大肠大型上皮性肿瘤的长期疗效。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Nov;163(5):1423-1434.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
Comparing Emergent and Elective Colectomy Outcomes in Elderly Patients: A NSQIP Study.比较老年患者急诊和择期结肠切除术的结局:一项 NSQIP 研究。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec 6;2021:9990434. doi: 10.1155/2021/9990434. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of Endoscopic Techniques in the Management of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Systematic Review.内镜技术在I型胃神经内分泌肿瘤治疗中的比较:一项系统评价
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Mar 30;2021:6679397. doi: 10.1155/2021/6679397. eCollection 2021.
9
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study.北美内镜黏膜下剥离术:一项大型前瞻性多中心研究。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jun;160(7):2317-2327.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
Endoscopic resection is more effective than biopsy or EUS to detect residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor.在内镜下切除在检测残留直肠神经内分泌肿瘤方面比活检或超声内镜更有效。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jan;9(1):E4-E8. doi: 10.1055/a-1300-1017. Epub 2021 Jan 1.