Mejaddam Ala, Carlsen Hanne K, Larsson Ingrid, Eeg-Olofsson Katarina, Lugner Moa, Ottosson Johan, Stenberg Erik, Höskuldsdóttir Gudrun, Eliasson Björn
Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Aug 30;58:101430. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101430. eCollection 2025 Nov.
Long-term data on the efficacy and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are still limited. Using a matched cohort design, we aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of RYGB and SG on individuals with T2DM, focussing on obesity- and surgery-related outcomes over a follow-up period of up to 14 years.
A nationwide, matched, longitudinal study was conducted using data from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR) and the Swedish Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). Between 2007 and 2020, all individuals with T2DM who underwent primary surgery (RYGB = 7294 and SG = 1105) were identified through SOReg and matched by age, sex, and BMI to a control group of individuals with T2DM from NDR who had not undergone surgery (n = 8399). Data on all-cause mortality and obesity- and surgery-related outcomes after RYGB and SG were retrieved from national registers with almost complete coverage. Risks were expressed as incidence rates per 10,000 person-years and analysed using adjusted Cox regression models, which included duration of diabetes, yielding adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
During follow-up, the percentage total weight loss and reductions in HbA1c levels were significantly greater after RYGB and SG than in unexposed individuals (%TWL: RYGB 23·2 vs. 3·6 and SG 17·1 vs. 3·1 at two years, smd > 0·1) and (mean HbA1c: RYGB 46 (SD 14) vs. 58 (SD 17) and SG 46 (SD 13) vs. 55 (SD 15) at two years, smd > 0·1). RYGB was associated with sustainable reductions in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR of 0·62 (95% CI [0·51-0·71])) and obesity-related comorbidities, with risks as much as 45% lower compared to unexposed individuals (p < 0·001). However, individuals after RYGB face as much as a twofold increased risk of malabsorption and micronutrient deficiency (adjusted HR of 2·00 (95% CI [1·76-2·28])) and alcohol use disorder (adjusted HR of 2·82 (95% CI [2·37-3·36])), p < 0·001. The risk of other psychiatric disorders, such as depression (adjusted HR of 1·28 (95% CI [1·14-1·43])), and surgical complications, such as bowel obstruction (adjusted HR of 3·96 (95% CI [3·15-4·98])), was also higher after RYGB (p < 0·001). In contrast, the SG cohort showed no significant effects on obesity-related conditions and risk of surgical complications, despite similar weight reduction in both surgery groups.
The study highlights the advantages and limitations of RYGB and SG, providing insights to guide an individualised approach. The limited efficacy of SG in lowering obesity-related disease risks should be a key consideration when selecting individuals with T2DM for surgery.
A grant from the Swedish state under the agreement with the county councils.
关于Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)或袖状胃切除术(SG)治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的疗效和安全性的长期数据仍然有限。我们采用匹配队列设计,旨在评估RYGB和SG对T2DM患者的长期影响,重点关注长达14年随访期内与肥胖和手术相关的结局。
利用瑞典国家糖尿病登记处(NDR)和瑞典肥胖症手术登记处(SOReg)的数据进行了一项全国性、匹配的纵向研究。在2007年至2020年期间,通过SOReg识别出所有接受初次手术的T2DM患者(RYGB = 7294例,SG = 1105例),并按年龄、性别和BMI与未接受手术的NDR中T2DM患者对照组(n = 8399)进行匹配。从几乎覆盖全国的登记处获取RYGB和SG术后全因死亡率以及与肥胖和手术相关结局的数据。风险以每10000人年的发病率表示,并使用调整后的Cox回归模型进行分析,该模型包括糖尿病病程,得出调整后的风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
在随访期间,RYGB和SG术后的总体重减轻百分比和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平降低幅度显著大于未接受手术的个体(两年时的总体重减轻百分比:RYGB为23.2%对3.6%,SG为17.1%对3.1%,标准化均数差值>0.1),以及(两年时的平均HbA1c:RYGB为46(标准差14)对58(标准差17),SG为46(标准差13)对55(标准差15),标准化均数差值>0.1)。RYGB与全因死亡率的持续降低相关(调整后的HR为0.62(95%CI[0.51 - 0.71]))以及与肥胖相关的合并症,与未接受手术的个体相比,风险降低多达45%(p<0.001)。然而,RYGB术后个体发生吸收不良和微量营养素缺乏的风险增加多达两倍(调整后的HR为2.00(95%CI[1.76 - 2.28]))以及酒精使用障碍(调整后的HR为2.82(95%CI[2.37 - 3.36])),p<0.001。RYGB术后其他精神障碍如抑郁症(调整后的HR为1.28(95%CI[1.14 - 1.43]))以及手术并发症如肠梗阻(调整后的HR为3.96(95%CI[3.15 - 4.98]))的风险也更高(p<0.001)。相比之下,尽管两个手术组体重减轻相似,但SG队列对肥胖相关状况和手术并发症风险无显著影响。
该研究突出了RYGB和SG的优势与局限性,为指导个体化治疗方法提供了见解。在为T2DM患者选择手术时,SG在降低肥胖相关疾病风险方面疗效有限应作为关键考虑因素。
瑞典国家根据与郡议会的协议提供的一笔赠款。