• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于改善美国与墨西哥之间供应链决策的大流行风险指数:以新冠疫情为例

A pandemic risk index to improve supply chains decision-making between US and Mexico: A COVID-19 case study.

作者信息

Hernawan Billy, Duran-Sierra Guillermo F, Zarate-Losoya Enrique, Medina-Cetina Zenon, Olivares Miriam, Perez-Patron Maria J, Cochran Matt, Pompelli Gregory

机构信息

Zachry Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0327526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327526. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0327526
PMID:40934220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12425231/
Abstract

The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has been widely used as a benchmark to measure the state of vulnerability of counties across the United States. The SVI is integrated using a simple aggregation methodology on a set of variables reflecting the region's socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial & ethnic minority status, and housing type/transportation. Due to its simple construction and inclusion of significant variables publicly available, the SVI has grown exponentially in popularity among organizations and government officials as a tool for decision-making, especially for resource allocation and for regional risk assessment. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic brought a set of unprecedented challenges in the bi-national health between the United States and Mexico, particularly on the state of risk of supply chains. Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) became effective in 1994 and then renewed in 2020 as USMCA, Mexico has grown to be the biggest trading partner of the U.S., fast approaching a trade value of more than a trillion USD a year. For which conducting regional risk assessment following the SVI formulation can be a significant impact for multiple stakeholders and organizations. In this work, the formulation of the SVI is analyzed using a risk framework as a reference, to corroborate its applicability for decision-making, and to expand it to account for variables and processes impacting supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis shows that vulnerability is only one of three factors required to conduct risk assessment (i.e., hazards vulnerability, and consequences), needed to produce a baseline of reference to make informed decisions. A case study is also developed based on the use of the SVI during the COVID-19 pandemic for supply chains between the U.S. and Mexico, by introducing the formulation of a risk index that is compatible with the proposed risk framework. The first step to expand the SVI into a risk index for supply chains between U.S. and Mexico, was to reproduce the CDC methodology, followed by using an Empirical Cumulative Density Function (ECDF) aggregation methodology to justify it statistically, and then to illustrate its benefits and limitations when extended into a new risk index (accounting for the three required risk components). As a result, a bi-national risk index map is produced after harmonizing publicly available variables in the U.S. and Mexico, illustrating the potential to quantify the state of regional risk for supply chains and other path-dependent systems, and setting a reference to further improve it.

摘要

美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)开发的社会脆弱性指数(SVI),已被广泛用作衡量美国各县脆弱性状况的基准。SVI是通过一种简单的汇总方法,将一组反映该地区社会经济状况、家庭特征、种族和少数民族地位以及住房类型/交通状况的变量整合而成。由于其构建简单且包含公开可用的重要变量,SVI在组织和政府官员中作为决策工具,尤其是资源分配和区域风险评估工具的受欢迎程度呈指数级增长。此外,新冠疫情给美墨两国的双边卫生带来了一系列前所未有的挑战,特别是在供应链风险状况方面。自1994年北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)生效并于2020年续签为美墨加协定(USMCA)以来,墨西哥已发展成为美国最大的贸易伙伴,年贸易额迅速接近一万多亿美元。因此,按照SVI的制定方法进行区域风险评估,可能会对多个利益相关者和组织产生重大影响。在这项工作中,以风险框架为参考对SVI的制定进行分析,以证实其在决策中的适用性,并将其扩展以纳入影响新冠疫情期间供应链的变量和流程。该分析表明,脆弱性只是进行风险评估所需的三个因素之一(即危害、脆弱性和后果),需要以此为参考基准来做出明智决策。还基于新冠疫情期间SVI在美国和墨西哥之间供应链中的应用开展了一个案例研究,通过引入与所提议风险框架兼容的风险指数的制定方法。将SVI扩展为美墨之间供应链风险指数的第一步,是重现疾病预防控制中心的方法,然后使用经验累积密度函数(ECDF)汇总方法进行统计论证,接着说明将其扩展为新风险指数(考虑三个所需风险组成部分)时的优点和局限性。结果,在协调美国和墨西哥的公开可用变量后生成了一张双边风险指数地图,展示了量化供应链及其他路径依赖系统区域风险状况的潜力,并为进一步改进设定了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/282dff41b636/pone.0327526.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/403403bd5480/pone.0327526.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/3bf4c0bb8437/pone.0327526.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/61e96f42a0e0/pone.0327526.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/87ee96265493/pone.0327526.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/44130a0ed6b9/pone.0327526.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/f84991d8d8e7/pone.0327526.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/5b1fea184e1a/pone.0327526.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/282dff41b636/pone.0327526.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/403403bd5480/pone.0327526.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/3bf4c0bb8437/pone.0327526.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/61e96f42a0e0/pone.0327526.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/87ee96265493/pone.0327526.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/44130a0ed6b9/pone.0327526.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/f84991d8d8e7/pone.0327526.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/5b1fea184e1a/pone.0327526.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fd1/12425231/282dff41b636/pone.0327526.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
A pandemic risk index to improve supply chains decision-making between US and Mexico: A COVID-19 case study.一种用于改善美国与墨西哥之间供应链决策的大流行风险指数:以新冠疫情为例
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0327526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327526. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
7
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
10
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Validity of Validation: A Commentary on Rufat, Tate, Emrich, and Antolini's "How Valid Are Social Vulnerability Models?".关于验证的有效性:对鲁法特、泰特、埃姆里希和安托利尼的《社会脆弱性模型的有效性如何?》的评论
Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2019;109(4):1131-1153. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1535887.
2
Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems.新冠疫情期间全球公共卫生保健系统面临的挑战:疫情应对措施与问题综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 7;12(8):1295. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081295.
3
COVID-19 double jeopardy: the overwhelming impact of the social determinants of health.
COVID-19 的双重危害:健康社会决定因素的压倒性影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 May 24;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01629-0.
4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and COVID-19: interrelationships.慢性阻塞性肺疾病与 COVID-19:相互关系。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2022 Mar 1;28(2):76-83. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000834.
5
A time-varying vulnerability index for COVID-19 in New Mexico, USA using generalized propensity scores.美国新墨西哥州使用广义倾向得分的COVID-19随时间变化的脆弱性指数。
Health Policy Open. 2021 Dec;2:100052. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100052. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
6
A dynamic risk assessment model to assess the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the sustainability of the biomass supply chain: A case study of a U.S. biofuel industry.一种用于评估冠状病毒(COVID-19)对生物质供应链可持续性影响的动态风险评估模型:以美国生物燃料行业为例
Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021 Nov;151:111574. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111574. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
7
Role of Hypertension on the Severity of COVID-19: A Review.高血压对 COVID-19 严重程度的影响:综述。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 1;78(5):e648-e655. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001116.
8
Individuals with obesity and COVID-19: A global perspective on the epidemiology and biological relationships.肥胖与 COVID-19 患者:流行病学和生物学关系的全球视角。
Obes Rev. 2020 Nov;21(11):e13128. doi: 10.1111/obr.13128. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
Allergic disorders and susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study.过敏疾病与 COVID-19 的易感性和严重程度:一项全国性队列研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;146(4):790-798. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
10
COVID-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes.COVID-19 与糖尿病:了解预后不佳的原因。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Sep;8(9):782-792. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30238-2. Epub 2020 Jul 17.