Hernawan Billy, Duran-Sierra Guillermo F, Zarate-Losoya Enrique, Medina-Cetina Zenon, Olivares Miriam, Perez-Patron Maria J, Cochran Matt, Pompelli Gregory
Zachry Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 11;20(9):e0327526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327526. eCollection 2025.
The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has been widely used as a benchmark to measure the state of vulnerability of counties across the United States. The SVI is integrated using a simple aggregation methodology on a set of variables reflecting the region's socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial & ethnic minority status, and housing type/transportation. Due to its simple construction and inclusion of significant variables publicly available, the SVI has grown exponentially in popularity among organizations and government officials as a tool for decision-making, especially for resource allocation and for regional risk assessment. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic brought a set of unprecedented challenges in the bi-national health between the United States and Mexico, particularly on the state of risk of supply chains. Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) became effective in 1994 and then renewed in 2020 as USMCA, Mexico has grown to be the biggest trading partner of the U.S., fast approaching a trade value of more than a trillion USD a year. For which conducting regional risk assessment following the SVI formulation can be a significant impact for multiple stakeholders and organizations. In this work, the formulation of the SVI is analyzed using a risk framework as a reference, to corroborate its applicability for decision-making, and to expand it to account for variables and processes impacting supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis shows that vulnerability is only one of three factors required to conduct risk assessment (i.e., hazards vulnerability, and consequences), needed to produce a baseline of reference to make informed decisions. A case study is also developed based on the use of the SVI during the COVID-19 pandemic for supply chains between the U.S. and Mexico, by introducing the formulation of a risk index that is compatible with the proposed risk framework. The first step to expand the SVI into a risk index for supply chains between U.S. and Mexico, was to reproduce the CDC methodology, followed by using an Empirical Cumulative Density Function (ECDF) aggregation methodology to justify it statistically, and then to illustrate its benefits and limitations when extended into a new risk index (accounting for the three required risk components). As a result, a bi-national risk index map is produced after harmonizing publicly available variables in the U.S. and Mexico, illustrating the potential to quantify the state of regional risk for supply chains and other path-dependent systems, and setting a reference to further improve it.
美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)开发的社会脆弱性指数(SVI),已被广泛用作衡量美国各县脆弱性状况的基准。SVI是通过一种简单的汇总方法,将一组反映该地区社会经济状况、家庭特征、种族和少数民族地位以及住房类型/交通状况的变量整合而成。由于其构建简单且包含公开可用的重要变量,SVI在组织和政府官员中作为决策工具,尤其是资源分配和区域风险评估工具的受欢迎程度呈指数级增长。此外,新冠疫情给美墨两国的双边卫生带来了一系列前所未有的挑战,特别是在供应链风险状况方面。自1994年北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)生效并于2020年续签为美墨加协定(USMCA)以来,墨西哥已发展成为美国最大的贸易伙伴,年贸易额迅速接近一万多亿美元。因此,按照SVI的制定方法进行区域风险评估,可能会对多个利益相关者和组织产生重大影响。在这项工作中,以风险框架为参考对SVI的制定进行分析,以证实其在决策中的适用性,并将其扩展以纳入影响新冠疫情期间供应链的变量和流程。该分析表明,脆弱性只是进行风险评估所需的三个因素之一(即危害、脆弱性和后果),需要以此为参考基准来做出明智决策。还基于新冠疫情期间SVI在美国和墨西哥之间供应链中的应用开展了一个案例研究,通过引入与所提议风险框架兼容的风险指数的制定方法。将SVI扩展为美墨之间供应链风险指数的第一步,是重现疾病预防控制中心的方法,然后使用经验累积密度函数(ECDF)汇总方法进行统计论证,接着说明将其扩展为新风险指数(考虑三个所需风险组成部分)时的优点和局限性。结果,在协调美国和墨西哥的公开可用变量后生成了一张双边风险指数地图,展示了量化供应链及其他路径依赖系统区域风险状况的潜力,并为进一步改进设定了参考。