• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邪恶判断与惩罚判断之间的关系。

The Relationship Between Judgments of Evil and Punishment Judgments.

作者信息

Wheat Ryan, Goodwin Geoffrey

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Oct;1552(1):165-173. doi: 10.1111/nyas.70054. Epub 2025 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1111/nyas.70054
PMID:40936262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12576864/
Abstract

What consequences result from judging a given act (or its perpetrator) as evil? Because evil actions represent the worst possible forms of immorality, and that on some conceptions evil people are irredeemable, it stands to reason that judgments of evil would predict severe punishments. However, surprisingly little is known about precisely how judgments of evil relate to judgments of punishment. We theorized that judgments of evilness should add unique predictive value beyond comparable, and more widely studied, measures of wrongness, blame, and moral character. In a preregistered study, participants (N = 238) made moral judgments and punishment recommendations in response to a comprehensive range of wrongs (e.g., theft, battery, manslaughter, murder). Results revealed three general findings. First, judgments of evil uniquely predicted punishment recommendations beyond related moral judgments (e.g., wrongness, blame, moral character). Second, judgments of evil uniquely predicted death penalty endorsement and judgments of an offender's potential rehabilitation, whereas other moral judgments did not always do so. Finally, death penalty endorsement and rehabilitation judgments were better associated with person judgments than with act judgments, whereas more general punishment judgments showed no such divergence. These findings illuminate the predictive power of judgments of evil with regard to punishment judgments.

摘要

将某一特定行为(或其实施者)判定为邪恶会产生什么后果?由于邪恶行为代表了最严重的不道德形式,而且在某些观念中,恶人是不可救赎的,因此可以合理推断,对邪恶的判断会预示着严厉的惩罚。然而,令人惊讶的是,对于邪恶判断与惩罚判断究竟如何关联,我们知之甚少。我们提出理论,认为邪恶判断应能在可比且研究更广泛的错误、责备和道德品质衡量标准之外,增加独特的预测价值。在一项预先注册的研究中,参与者(N = 238)针对一系列广泛的过错(如盗窃、殴打、过失杀人、谋杀)做出了道德判断和惩罚建议。结果揭示了三个总体发现。首先,除了相关的道德判断(如错误、责备、道德品质)之外,邪恶判断能独特地预测惩罚建议。其次,邪恶判断能独特地预测死刑支持率以及对罪犯潜在改过自新的判断,而其他道德判断并非总是如此。最后,死刑支持率和改过自新判断与人的判断的关联比与行为判断的关联更强,而更一般的惩罚判断则没有这种差异。这些发现揭示了邪恶判断在惩罚判断方面的预测能力。

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between Judgments of Evil and Punishment Judgments.邪恶判断与惩罚判断之间的关系。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Oct;1552(1):165-173. doi: 10.1111/nyas.70054. Epub 2025 Sep 11.
2
Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment.犯罪与惩罚:区分因果分析和意图分析在道德判断中的作用
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):353-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
3
No luck for moral luck.道德运气不眷顾。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:331-348. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
4
Moral Judgments.道德判断。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:293-318. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
Elevated moral condemnation of third-party violations in multiple sclerosis patients.对多发性硬化症患者第三方违规行为的道德谴责加剧。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Jun;12(3):308-329. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1175380. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
6
When morality opposes the law: An fMRI investigation into punishment judgments for crimes with good intentions.当道德与法律相悖:一项关于出于善意犯罪的惩罚判断的 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Apr;127:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
The development of intent-based moral judgment.基于意图的道德判断的发展。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):6-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
8
The development of moral judgments concerning capital punishment.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1975 Jul;45(4):614-640. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1975.tb01191.x.
9
They should have known better: The roles of negligence and outcome in moral judgements of accidental actions.他们本应更明白:疏忽与结果在对意外行为的道德评判中的作用。
Br J Psychol. 2022 May;113(2):370-395. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12536. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
10
Individual differences in moral judgment competence are related to activity of the prefrontal cortex when attributing blame to evil intention.在将责任归咎于恶意意图时,道德判断能力的个体差异与前额叶皮层的活动有关。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(4):438-48. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1093960. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Pleasure From Another's Pain: The Influence of a Target's Hedonic States on Attributions of Immorality and Evil.他人痛苦中的愉悦:目标对象的享乐状态对不道德与邪恶归因的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Aug;42(8):1077-91. doi: 10.1177/0146167216651408. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
Moral Vitalism: Seeing Good and Evil as Real, Agentic Forces.道德活力论:将善与恶视为真实的、具有能动作用的力量。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Aug;41(8):1069-81. doi: 10.1177/0146167215589819. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
3
A person-centered approach to moral judgment.一种以人为本的道德判断方法。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):72-81. doi: 10.1177/1745691614556679.
4
Brutality under cover of ambiguity: activating, perpetuating, and deactivating covert retributivism.模糊掩盖下的暴行:激活、延续与消解隐性报复主义
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 May;41(5):629-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167215571090. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
5
Angels and demons are among us: assessing individual differences in belief in pure evil and belief in pure good.天使与恶魔就在我们身边:评估对纯粹邪恶和纯粹善良的信仰的个体差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1455-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167213496282. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
6
When it takes a bad person to do the right thing.当一个坏人做了正确的事。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):326-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
7
The recurrence of an illusion: the concept of "evil" in forensic psychiatry.一种错觉的重现:法医精神病学中的“邪恶”概念
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(1):105-16.
8
Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment.惩罚的动机: incapacitation(使无能力)和应得的惩罚
Law Hum Behav. 2000 Dec;24(6):659-83. doi: 10.1023/a:1005552203727.