Rai Vandana, Aleemuddin Mohammed, Kulasekaran Kanimozhi, Pai Sushant A, Singh Ananya
Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 11;17(8):e89819. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89819. eCollection 2025 Aug.
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the linear dimensional and weight changes of four types of interocclusal recording materials, polyether (Ramitec), two polyvinylsiloxane variants (O-Bite and Jet Bite), and dimethacrylate (LuxaBite), at 1-hour, 24-hour, and 1-week intervals to assess their effectiveness in maintaining accurate occlusal records.
20 samples of each interocclusal recording material were prepared using a stainless-steel die with a test block and ring mold. Each sample, measuring 30 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness, was subjected to a 500-g weight for five minutes. Dimensional changes were measured using a stereomicroscope, and weight changes were assessed with an electronic scale at the specified intervals of 1 hour, 24 hours, and 1 week. Statistical analyses such as one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA, were used to compare the data using SPSS software version 26.
Among the materials evaluated, polyvinylsiloxane material (Jet Bite) demonstrated the highest accuracy and dimensional stability with minimal changes over time (0.49% at 1 hour, 0.52% at 24 hours, and 0.50% at 1 week). The second polyvinylsiloxane (O-Bite) exhibited slightly higher dimensional changes (1.13% at 1 hour, 1.51% at 24 hours, and 1.50% at 1 week). The polyether material (Ramitec) showed significant initial variation (3% at 1 hour) but minimal changes thereafter. The dimethacrylate material (LuxaBite) expanded at 1 hour and then contracted, correlating with weight loss due to polymerization.
Among the materials tested, polyvinylsiloxane demonstrated the highest dimensional accuracy and stability. Accuracy was markedly improved when casts were mounted shortly after recording, highlighting the importance of minimizing storage time. Additionally, all materials exhibited a significant correlation between weight changes and dimensional alterations, suggesting that shrinkage or expansion can impact clinical reliability. Therefore, selecting appropriate recording materials and ensuring timely mounting of the cast are crucial for achieving optimal prosthodontic results.
本研究旨在评估和比较四种牙合间记录材料,即聚醚(Ramitec)、两种聚乙烯基硅氧烷变体(O - Bite和Jet Bite)以及二甲基丙烯酸酯(LuxaBite)在1小时、24小时和1周时间间隔内的线性尺寸和重量变化,以评估它们在保持准确牙合记录方面的有效性。
使用带有测试块和环形模具的不锈钢模具制备每种牙合间记录材料的20个样本。每个样本直径为30毫米,厚度为2毫米,承受500克重量5分钟。使用体视显微镜测量尺寸变化,并在1小时、24小时和1周的指定时间间隔用电子秤评估重量变化。使用SPSS 26版软件进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和重复测量方差分析等统计分析来比较数据。
在所评估的材料中,聚乙烯基硅氧烷材料(Jet Bite)表现出最高的准确性和尺寸稳定性,随时间变化最小(1小时时为0.49%,24小时时为0.52%,1周时为0.50%)。第二种聚乙烯基硅氧烷(O - Bite)表现出稍高的尺寸变化(1小时时为1.13%,24小时时为1.51%,1周时为1.50%)。聚醚材料(Ramitec)在初始时变化显著(1小时时为3%),但此后变化最小。二甲基丙烯酸酯材料(LuxaBite)在1小时时膨胀,然后收缩,这与聚合导致的重量损失相关。
在所测试的材料中,聚乙烯基硅氧烷表现出最高的尺寸准确性和稳定性。记录后不久安装铸型时,准确性显著提高,突出了尽量减少储存时间的重要性。此外,所有材料的重量变化和尺寸改变之间都表现出显著相关性,表明收缩或膨胀会影响临床可靠性。因此,选择合适的记录材料并确保及时安装铸型对于获得最佳的口腔修复结果至关重要。