• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于小肠梗阻,我们应选择保守治疗还是手术治疗:手术治疗与非手术治疗的死亡率和再入院率对比

Should we let the sun set or rise on a small bowel obstruction: mortality and readmission rates in operative versus nonoperative management.

作者信息

Jose Anna Mary, Kirsch Jordan, Prabhakaran Kartik, Rafieezadeh Aryan, Mehta Riddhi, Shnaydman Ilya, Klein Joshua, Froula Gabriel, Carlson Amanda, Zangbar Bardiya

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Taylor Pavilion, Office D-368, 100 Woods Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12059-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-12059-8
PMID:40938369
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent small bowel obstruction (SBO) can result in significant morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to compare readmission and its impact on operatively and nonoperatively managed patients admitted with SBO.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Readmission Database 2016-2017 and included all patients (≥ 18y) who were non-elective admissions for SBO during the index hospitalization. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: Operative group (OM) and nonoperative group (NOM). Primary outcomes included rates of readmission and mortality upon readmission. Secondary outcomes included complications, which were defined as fistula, abscess, perforation, peritonitis, and sepsis.

RESULTS

122,778 patients admitted for SBO were included. Overall, the readmission was 29.8%, with 34.4% readmitted within 30 days. 6.4% were OM, while 93.6% were NOM during index admission. Among OM patients, the readmission rate was significantly lower at 28.6% compared to NOM at 29.9% (p < 0.001). Among the readmitted NOM patients, 88.3% had emergency readmissions, with 10.6% requiring operative intervention. Adjusted analyses revealed that NOM had 32% higher odds of readmission (p < 0.001). Other factors increasing the odds of readmission included female sex, a high Charlson comorbidity index, and an admission diagnosis of cancer. Among readmitted patients, NOM had 50% higher odds of mortality during readmission. Each readmission raised the odds of mortality by 4.0% (p < 0.001). Operative management in the first readmission was associated with younger age, private insurance status, and non-operative management during the index admission.

CONCLUSION

While cost, length of stay, and complications were higher in OM, NOM was associated with a higher readmission rate and mortality upon readmission. Each additional readmission for small bowel obstruction increased the odds of mortality by 4.0%.

摘要

背景

复发性小肠梗阻(SBO)可导致显著的发病率和死亡率。在本研究中,我们旨在比较再次入院情况及其对因SBO入院的手术治疗和非手术治疗患者的影响。

方法

我们使用2016 - 2017年国家再入院数据库进行了一项回顾性分析,纳入了所有在首次住院期间因SBO非选择性入院的患者(≥18岁)。患者被分为两组:手术组(OM)和非手术组(NOM)。主要结局包括再入院率和再入院时的死亡率。次要结局包括并发症,定义为瘘、脓肿、穿孔、腹膜炎和脓毒症。

结果

纳入了122778例因SBO入院的患者。总体而言,再入院率为29.8%,其中34.4%在30天内再次入院。首次入院时,6.4%为OM患者,93.6%为NOM患者。在OM患者中,再入院率显著低于NOM患者,分别为28.6%和29.9%(p < 0.001)。在再次入院的NOM患者中,88.3%为急诊再入院,10.6%需要手术干预。校正分析显示,NOM的再入院几率高32%(p < 0.001)。增加再入院几率的其他因素包括女性、高Charlson合并症指数和癌症入院诊断。在再次入院的患者中,NOM的再入院死亡率高50%。每次再入院使死亡率几率增加4.0%(p < 0.001)。首次再入院时的手术治疗与年龄较小、有私人保险状态以及首次入院时的非手术治疗有关。

结论

虽然OM患者的费用、住院时间和并发症较高,但NOM与更高的再入院率和再入院时的死亡率相关。小肠梗阻每增加一次再入院,死亡率几率增加4.0%。

相似文献

1
Should we let the sun set or rise on a small bowel obstruction: mortality and readmission rates in operative versus nonoperative management.对于小肠梗阻,我们应选择保守治疗还是手术治疗:手术治疗与非手术治疗的死亡率和再入院率对比
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12059-8.
2
High Risk of Readmission After THA Regardless of Functional Status in Patients Discharged to Skilled Nursing Facility.入住专业护理机构的患者,无论功能状态如何,全髋关节置换术后再入院风险均高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1185-1192. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002950. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?髋关节发育不良的术前或术后治疗是否与髋臼周围截骨术的结果较差相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1987-1996. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003150. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Readmission Within 90 Days After Primary THA Is Associated With Decreased Improvement in 1-Year Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Increased Reoperation Rates.初次全髋关节置换术后90天内再次入院与患者报告的1年结局指标改善降低及再次手术率增加相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429.
6
Oral traditional Chinese medication for adhesive small bowel obstruction.口服中药治疗粘连性小肠梗阻。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD008836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008836.pub2.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Report Cards Are Out: Nine Years of Nonoperative Management for Blunt Abdominal Solid Organ Trauma.成绩单已公布:钝性腹部实性器官创伤的九年非手术治疗
J Surg Res. 2025 Jul 26;314:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.073.
10
What Is the Patient-reported Outcome and Complication Incidence After Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Minimally Displaced Tibial Plateau Fractures?手术与非手术治疗轻度移位胫骨平台骨折的患者报告结局和并发症发生率如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1744-1752. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003057. Epub 2024 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
One-year outcomes following operative or non-operative management of adhesional small bowel obstruction.粘连性小肠梗阻手术或非手术治疗后的 1 年结果。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad103.
2
Early operative management in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: population-based cost analysis.黏连性小肠梗阻患者的早期手术治疗:基于人群的成本分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):914-923. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50311. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
Outcomes in adhesive small bowel obstruction from a large statewide database: What to expect after nonoperative management.
来自大型全州范围数据库的粘连性小肠梗阻的结局:非手术治疗后的预期结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Apr;86(4):651-657. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002196.
4
Association of Surgical Intervention for Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction With the Risk of Recurrence.手术干预粘连性小肠梗阻与复发风险的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):413-420. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5248.
5
Management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: A distinct paradigm shift in the United States.黏连性小肠梗阻的治疗:美国的显著治疗模式转变。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Mar;86(3):383-391. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002150.
6
Operative versus non-operative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.手术与非手术治疗黏连性小肠梗阻的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Sep;45:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.073. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
7
Use of National Burden to Define Operative Emergency General Surgery.利用国家负担来定义急诊普通外科手术。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 15;151(6):e160480. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0480.
8
Small bowel obstruction: A practical step-by-step evidence-based approach to evaluation, decision making, and management.小肠梗阻:一种基于证据的实用逐步评估、决策和管理方法。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Oct;79(4):661-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000824.
9
Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.小肠梗阻的评估和处理:东部创伤外科学会实践管理指南。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5 Suppl 4):S362-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827019de.
10
Severe adhesive small bowel obstruction.严重粘连性小肠梗阻。
Front Med. 2012 Dec;6(4):436-9. doi: 10.1007/s11684-012-0221-7. Epub 2012 Oct 2.