Chou K C, Némethy G, Rumsey S, Tuttle R W, Scheraga H A
J Mol Biol. 1985 Dec 5;186(3):591-609. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90133-0.
Conformational energy computations have been carried out to determine the favorable ways of packing a right-handed alpha-helix on a right-twisted antiparallel or parallel beta-sheet. Co-ordinate transformations have been developed to relate the position and orientation of the alpha-helix to the beta-sheet. The packing was investigated for a CH3CO-(L-Ala)16-NHCH3 alpha-helix interacting with five-stranded beta-sheets composed of CH3CO-(L-Val)6-NHCH3 chains. All internal and external variables for both the alpha-helix and the beta-sheet were allowed to change during energy minimization. Four distinct classes of low-energy packing arrangements were found for the alpha-helix interacting with both the parallel and the anti-parallel beta-sheet. The classes differ in the orientation of the axis of the alpha-helix relative to the direction of the strands of the right-twisted beta-sheet. In the class with the most favorable arrangement, the alpha-helix is oriented along the strands of the beta-sheet, as a result of attractive non-bonded side-chain-side-chain interactions along the entire length of the alpha-helix. A class with nearly perpendicular orientation of the helix axis to the strands is also of low energy, because it allows similarly extensive attractive interactions. In the other two classes, the helix is oriented diagonally relative to the strands of the beta-sheet. In one of them, it interacts with the convex surface near the middle of the saddle-shaped twisted beta-sheet. In the other, it is oriented along the concave diagonal of the beta-sheet and, therefore, it interacts only with the corner regions of the sheet, so that this packing is energetically less favorable. The packing arrangements involving an antiparallel and a parallel beta-sheet are generally similar, although the antiparallel beta-sheet has been found to be more flexible. The major features of 163 observed alpha/beta packing arrangements in 37 proteins are accounted for in terms of the computed structural preferences. The energetically most favored packing arrangement is similar to the right-handed beta alpha beta crossover structure that is observed in proteins; thus, the preference for this connectivity arises in large measure from this energetically favorable interaction.
已进行构象能量计算,以确定将右手α-螺旋堆积在右扭曲反平行或平行β-折叠上的有利方式。已开发坐标变换,以关联α-螺旋与β-折叠的位置和方向。研究了CH3CO-(L-Ala)16-NHCH3α-螺旋与由CH3CO-(L-Val)6-NHCH3链组成的五链β-折叠的堆积情况。在能量最小化过程中,允许α-螺旋和β-折叠的所有内部和外部变量发生变化。发现与平行和反平行β-折叠相互作用的α-螺旋有四类不同的低能量堆积排列。这些类别在α-螺旋轴相对于右扭曲β-折叠链方向的取向上有所不同。在最有利排列的类别中,α-螺旋沿着β-折叠的链取向,这是由于沿着α-螺旋的整个长度存在有吸引力的非键合侧链-侧链相互作用。螺旋轴与链几乎垂直取向的类别能量也较低,因为它允许类似的广泛吸引相互作用。在另外两类中,螺旋相对于β-折叠的链呈对角线取向。其中一类中,它与鞍形扭曲β-折叠中间附近的凸面相互作用。另一类中,它沿着β-折叠的凹对角线取向,因此仅与折叠的角区域相互作用,所以这种堆积在能量上不太有利。涉及反平行和平行β-折叠的堆积排列通常相似,尽管已发现反平行β-折叠更具柔性。根据计算出的结构偏好解释了在37种蛋白质中观察到的163种α/β堆积排列的主要特征。能量上最有利的堆积排列类似于在蛋白质中观察到的右手β-α-β交叉结构;因此,对这种连接性的偏好很大程度上源于这种能量上有利的相互作用。