• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧与单侧腹横肌平面阻滞联合脊髓麻醉用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:一项回顾性观察研究

Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Şengel Abdulhakim, Büyükfırat Evren, Seçilmiş Selçuk, Altay Nuray, Atlas Ahmet, Karahan Mahmut Alp

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Osmanbey Campus, 63200 Sanlıurfa, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kahta State Hospital, 02600 Adıyaman, Turkey.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;15(17):2122. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172122.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15172122
PMID:40941609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12427678/
Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LsA) is a standard acute surgical procedure typically performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, GA is associated with side effects such as hemodynamic instability and postoperative nausea/vomiting. Regional anesthesia (RA) has gained attention as an effective alternative in such surgeries, as it reduces surgical stress responses, provides adequate postoperative analgesia, and promotes early mobilization. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the combined use of spinal anesthesia (SA) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in LsA procedures. This retrospective observational study included 220 patients who underwent LsA between 2020 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 ( = 110) received bilateral TAPB, and Group 2 ( = 110) received unilateral TAPB, both under SA. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and outcomes such as time to first analgesic requirement, analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction were recorded. This study evaluated the effects of SA combined with TAPB in LsA. Bilateral TAPB significantly prolonged the time to first analgesic request (13.7 vs. 12.1 h; = 0.001) and reduced analgesic requirements ( = 0.008) compared to unilateral TAPB. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group 1 at the 9th and 12th hours postoperatively ( = 0.003 and = 0.039). Although overall satisfaction scores were similar, a higher proportion of patients in Group 1 reported being "very satisfied" or "excellent" (55.5% vs. 42.7%). The combination of spinal anesthesia and bilateral TAPB is a safe and effective anesthetic strategy for LsA. Compared to unilateral TAPB, it offers superior postoperative analgesia and improved patient satisfaction.

摘要

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LsA)是一种标准的急性外科手术,通常在全身麻醉(GA)下进行。然而,全身麻醉会伴有血流动力学不稳定和术后恶心/呕吐等副作用。区域麻醉(RA)作为此类手术的一种有效替代方法受到关注,因为它能减轻手术应激反应,提供充分的术后镇痛,并促进早期活动。本研究评估了蛛网膜下腔麻醉(SA)联合腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)在LsA手术中的有效性。这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2020年至2023年间接受LsA手术的220例患者。患者被分为两组:第1组(n = 110)接受双侧TAPB,第2组(n = 110)接受单侧TAPB,两组均在蛛网膜下腔麻醉下进行。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后疼痛,并记录首次需要镇痛的时间、镇痛药物用量和患者满意度等结果。本研究评估了蛛网膜下腔麻醉联合TAPB在LsA中的效果。与单侧TAPB相比,双侧TAPB显著延长了首次需要镇痛的时间(13.7小时对12.1小时;P = 0.001),并减少了镇痛药物用量(P = 0.008)。术后第9小时和第12小时,第1组的VAS评分显著更低(P = 0.003和P = 0.039)。尽管总体满意度评分相似,但第1组中报告“非常满意”或“优秀”的患者比例更高(55.5%对42.7%)。蛛网膜下腔麻醉联合双侧TAPB是LsA手术中一种安全有效的麻醉策略。与单侧TAPB相比,它提供了更好的术后镇痛效果,提高了患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e396/12427678/eaad072bd094/diagnostics-15-02122-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e396/12427678/eaad072bd094/diagnostics-15-02122-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e396/12427678/eaad072bd094/diagnostics-15-02122-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.双侧与单侧腹横肌平面阻滞联合脊髓麻醉用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:一项回顾性观察研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 22;15(17):2122. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172122.
2
Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain control in patients with nephrectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.竖脊肌肌间沟阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞用于肾切除术患者术后疼痛控制的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Aug;95:111453. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111453. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Postoperative analgesic effects of combined transversus abdominis plane block and anterior approach of sacral plexus block in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial.腹横肌平面阻滞联合骶丛神经阻滞前路法对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者的术后镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Jun;104:111864. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111864. Epub 2025 May 9.
5
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub2.
6
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 12;2(2):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub3.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy and Recovery Outcomes: Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block at the Lateral Supra-Arcuate Ligament Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Partial Hepatectomy.镇痛效果与恢复结果的比较评估:腹腔镜下部分肝切除术中外侧弓状韧带上方腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞的对比
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001392.
8
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术后腹横肌平面阻滞用于术后镇痛
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2025 Aug;120(4):416-425. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.3134.
9
Perioperative analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜卵巢切除术犬中腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞的围手术期镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jun 20;12:1613741. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1613741. eCollection 2025.
10
Efficacy of OSTAP, ESP block, trocar site local anesthetic injection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.奥施康定、腹直肌鞘阻滞、套管针穿刺部位局部麻醉注射在择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 1;104(31):e43607. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043607.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Right Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Successful in Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?右侧腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛中是否有效?
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Apr 6;2022:2668215. doi: 10.1155/2022/2668215. eCollection 2022.
2
A Comparison of effect of preemptive versus postoperative use of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.超声引导下双侧腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞术超前与术后应用对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后镇痛效果的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 12;12(1):623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04552-6.
3
Spinal/epidural block as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study.
脊柱/硬膜外阻滞作为腹腔镜阑尾切除术全身麻醉的替代方法:一项前瞻性随机临床研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Jun;13(2):148-156. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.72684. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
The analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.腹横肌平面阻滞与硬膜外镇痛的镇痛效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11261. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011261.
5
Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: General vs regional anaesthesia.腹腔镜手术的麻醉:全身麻醉与区域麻醉
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jan-Mar;12(1):4-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.169952.
6
Comparative analysis of spinal versus general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A controlled, prospective, randomized trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的比较分析:一项对照、前瞻性、随机试验。
Anesth Essays Res. 2010 Jul-Dec;4(2):91-5. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.73514.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy under spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine infusion.在脊髓麻醉下输注右美托咪定进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Oct;67(4):246-51. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.4.246. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
8
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Spinal Anaesthesia vs. General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomised Study.脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉下行腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Aug;8(8):NC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9829.4700. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study.脊髓麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Apr;9(2):65-71. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.110965.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under epidural anesthesia: a clinical feasibility study.硬膜外麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项临床可行性研究。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Dec;59(6):383-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.59.6.383. Epub 2010 Dec 31.