• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在经典预后因素中,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为子宫内膜癌的一种预后工具。

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio a Prognostic Tool in Endometrial Cancer Among Classical Prognostic Factors.

作者信息

Kirsch-Mangu Alexandra Timea, Țîpcu Alexandru, Gâta Vlad Alexandru, Pop Diana Cristina, Fekete Zsolt, Irimie Alexandru, Kubelac Paul Milan

机构信息

Department of Oncology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Prof. Dr. I. Chiricută" Institute of Oncology, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;15(17):2172. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172172.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15172172
PMID:40941659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12428151/
Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, recurrence and mortality remain significant concerns. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of systemic inflammation, has shown prognostic value in several malignancies, but its utility in EC remains underexplored. To evaluate the prognostic significance of the preoperative NLR in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing primary surgical treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 398 patients with histologically confirmed endometrial adenocarcinoma surgically treated at a tertiary cancer center. Preoperative complete blood counts were used to calculate NLR, and a cutoff value of 2.27 was determined through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Patients with NLR ≥ 2.27 had significantly reduced median overall survival (OS) compared to those with NLR < 2.27 (72.3 vs. 92.8 months, = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, elevated NLR remained an independent predictor of poorer OS (HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.156-3.017; = 0.011), alongside age ≥ 64 years, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node involvement, and distant metastases. ROC analysis yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.646 for NLR. Notably, vaginal brachytherapy was associated with improved survival (HR = 0.53; = 0.026), while other adjuvant therapies were not independently significant. Preoperative NLR is an accessible, independent prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer and may serve as a surrogate indicator of tumor-promoting inflammation and immune dysregulation. Its integration into preoperative assessment could enhance risk stratification and guide personalized treatment strategies. However, findings should be interpreted in light of the study's retrospective design, single-center setting, and lack of molecular classification data. Prospective validation is warranted to confirm its clinical utility.

摘要

子宫内膜癌(EC)是发达国家最常见的妇科恶性肿瘤。尽管在诊断和治疗方面取得了进展,但复发和死亡率仍然是重大问题。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)作为全身炎症的标志物,已在多种恶性肿瘤中显示出预后价值,但其在子宫内膜癌中的应用仍未得到充分探索。为了评估术前NLR对接受初次手术治疗的子宫内膜癌患者的预后意义。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了在一家三级癌症中心接受手术治疗的398例经组织学确诊的子宫内膜腺癌患者。术前全血细胞计数用于计算NLR,并通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析确定截断值为2.27。使用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型评估生存结局。NLR≥2.27的患者与NLR<2.27的患者相比中位总生存期(OS)显著缩短(72.3个月对92.8个月,P = 0.008)。在多变量分析中,升高的NLR仍然是较差OS的独立预测因素(HR = 1.87;95%CI:1.156 - 3.017;P = 0.011),同时伴有年龄≥64岁、淋巴血管间隙浸润(LVSI)、淋巴结受累和远处转移。ROC分析得出NLR的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.646。值得注意的是,阴道近距离放疗与生存改善相关(HR = 0.53;P = 0.026),而其他辅助治疗并无独立显著意义。术前NLR是子宫内膜癌中一种可获取的独立预后生物标志物,可作为肿瘤促进性炎症和免疫失调的替代指标。将其纳入术前评估可加强风险分层并指导个性化治疗策略。然而,研究结果应结合该研究的回顾性设计、单中心设置以及缺乏分子分类数据来解读。有必要进行前瞻性验证以确认其临床效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/fedd3e7a4eec/diagnostics-15-02172-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/b6f07c43ecaa/diagnostics-15-02172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/51c663be9455/diagnostics-15-02172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/9c92999b22cc/diagnostics-15-02172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/68705f62126a/diagnostics-15-02172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/e49b210d1db0/diagnostics-15-02172-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/5c1bad499fc7/diagnostics-15-02172-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/626c4e96c678/diagnostics-15-02172-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/caa3b49e5c13/diagnostics-15-02172-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/2d2b08a5256e/diagnostics-15-02172-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/073f12298a7d/diagnostics-15-02172-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/fedd3e7a4eec/diagnostics-15-02172-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/b6f07c43ecaa/diagnostics-15-02172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/51c663be9455/diagnostics-15-02172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/9c92999b22cc/diagnostics-15-02172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/68705f62126a/diagnostics-15-02172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/e49b210d1db0/diagnostics-15-02172-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/5c1bad499fc7/diagnostics-15-02172-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/626c4e96c678/diagnostics-15-02172-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/caa3b49e5c13/diagnostics-15-02172-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/2d2b08a5256e/diagnostics-15-02172-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/073f12298a7d/diagnostics-15-02172-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dcb/12428151/fedd3e7a4eec/diagnostics-15-02172-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio a Prognostic Tool in Endometrial Cancer Among Classical Prognostic Factors.在经典预后因素中,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为子宫内膜癌的一种预后工具。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;15(17):2172. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172172.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
The preoperative HELPP score can be used as a prognostic assessment tool for resectable pancreatic cancer patients, and may be applicable to patients in China as well.术前HELPP评分可作为可切除胰腺癌患者的预后评估工具,在中国患者中可能也适用。
Gland Surg. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):1112-1127. doi: 10.21037/gs-2025-132. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
4
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Pretreatment Inflammatory Indices as Predictors of Survival in Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study From Mexico.子宫内膜癌生存预测的预处理炎症指标:来自墨西哥的一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2025 Aug 12;17(8):e89855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89855. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.CS比率是宫颈癌的一种免疫相关预后生物标志物。
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 27;15:1547529. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1547529. eCollection 2025.
7
The prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index on short- and long-term outcome following surgery for spinal metastases.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值和全身免疫炎症指数对脊柱转移瘤手术后短期和长期预后的预测作用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Dec 29;40(4):475-484. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.SPINE23851. Print 2024 Apr 1.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
10
Prognostic predictive value of the preoperative systemic immunoinflammatory index combined with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing transarterial chemoembolization.术前全身免疫炎症指数联合中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对接受经动脉化疗栓塞的原发性肝癌患者的预后预测价值
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jun 27;30(3):414. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15160. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Back to Basics: The Diagnostic Value of a Complete Blood Count in the Clinical Management of COVID-19.回归基础:全血细胞计数在新型冠状病毒肺炎临床管理中的诊断价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;14(17):1933. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171933.
2
FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)子宫内膜癌分期:2023 年。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(5):e85. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e85. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
3
Nomograms Based on Fibrinogen, Albumin, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Carbohydrate Antigen 125 for Predicting Endometrial Cancer Prognosis.
基于纤维蛋白原、白蛋白、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及糖类抗原125预测子宫内膜癌预后的列线图
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;14(22):5632. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225632.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness of Requesting a Complete Blood Count (CBC) in the Management of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯在2019冠状病毒病管理中进行全血细胞计数(CBC)的成本效益分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;10(9):1780. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091780.
5
Impact of pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index and the haemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score on endometrial cancer survival: A prospective database analysis.治疗前预后营养指数及血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板(HALP)评分对子宫内膜癌生存的影响:一项前瞻性数据库分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 4;17(8):e0272232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272232. eCollection 2022.
6
Beyond mismatch repair deficiency? Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with improved overall survival in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer treated with immunotherapy.除错配修复缺陷外?治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与复发性子宫内膜癌患者接受免疫治疗后总生存期的改善相关。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Sep;166(3):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
7
Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, or Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Endometrial Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.子宫内膜肿瘤中治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值或单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值的预后意义:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 May 16;12:734948. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.734948. eCollection 2022.
8
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, past, present and future perspectives.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:过去、现在和未来的展望。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(7):474-488. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2021_078.
9
The Ratio of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte is a Predictor in Endometrial Cancer.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比值是子宫内膜癌的一个预测指标。
Open Life Sci. 2019 Apr 6;14:110-118. doi: 10.1515/biol-2019-0012. eCollection 2019 Jan.
10
The analysis of the prognostic value of the neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio and the platelet/lymphocyte ratio among advanced endometrial cancer patients.晚期子宫内膜癌患者中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和血小板/淋巴细胞比值的预后价值分析
Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(1):16-23. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2020.0164. Epub 2021 Jan 15.