• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CS比率是宫颈癌的一种免疫相关预后生物标志物。

CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.

作者信息

Shi Peiqin, Zhang Wenwen, Yao Qingqing, Yuan Zhanna, Wang Jiaqi, Yang Ziye, Qu Pengpeng

机构信息

Clinical School of Obstetrics and Gynecology Center, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Tianjin Institute of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 27;15:1547529. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1547529. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1547529
PMID:40936719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12420272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in cancer progression but its complex structure significant variability among patients present considerable challenges for research. Recent studies have demonstrated that macrophage polarization states defined by the expression levels of CXCL9 SPP1 (CS Ratio) are more prognostically relevant than traditional M1/M2 markers. The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. The CS Ratio has been shown to correlate with the abundance of anti-tumor immune cells the gene expression programs of tumor-infiltrating cells responses to immunotherapy. Cervical cancer, one of the most common gynecological malignancies, still faces limited therapeutic options. CXCL9, a member of the CXC chemokine family, plays a critical role in immune regulation, inflammation, tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Similarly, SPP1, a cytokine, influences immune-related pathways by regulating molecules such as interferon-γ and interleukin-12. However, no studies have systematically investigated the role of the CS Ratio in cervical cancer or its relationship with immunotherapy characteristics. Research in this area could provide critical insights into the role and clinical potential of the CS Ratio in cervical cancer and related tumors.

METHODS

The expression ratio of CXCL9 to SPP1 was analyzed in cervical cancer patients using data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, which revealed significant differences. Data for cervical cancer patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The optimal cutoff value for the CS Ratio was determined using the maxstat package in R, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were constructed. Patients were categorized into High and Low groups based on the median CS Ratio. Immune scores were analyzed, and immune cell infiltration was assessed using CIBERSORT. Differences in the CS Ratio were evaluated across patients with varying pathological T stages and FIGO stages. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using the pROC package in R to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the potential of the CS Ratio as an independent prognostic factor in cervical cancer. A Cox regression-based nomogram integrating four key features was subsequently developed for the TCGA-CESC cohort. Nomogram performance was assessed using calibration curves and ROC analysis.

RESULTS

The CS Ratio was significantly lower in cervical cancer patients compared to normal controls (P < 0.05). KM survival curves indicated that patients in the CS High group exhibited better prognoses. Immune score analysis revealed significantly higher immune scores (P < 0.05) and lower tumor purity (P < 0.05)in the CS High group compared to the Low group. CIBERSORT analysis revealed significantly higher proportions of CD8+ T cells (P < 0.05) and M1 macrophages (P < 0.05), and a significantly lower proportion of M2 macrophages (P < 0.05), in the CS High group compared to the Low group. The CS Ratio significantly decreased with advancing FIGO stage (P < 0.05). Both univariate (P < 0.05) and multivariate Cox regression analyses (P < 0.05) confirmed the CS Ratio as an independent prognostic factor. ROC analysis demonstrated that the CS Ratio had higher AUC values for predicting 1-year (AUC=0.69), 3-year (AUC=0.66), and 5-year OS (AUC=0.68) than CXCL9 or SPP1 alone. The Cox regression-based nomogram integrating four key features demonstrated predictive capability for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in CESC patients (Concordance Index = 0.751; 95% CI: 0.678-0.824; p = 1.50Í10-11). Significant survival differences were observed between the high-risk and low-risk groups based on the nomogram score. ROC analysis yielded high AUC values for survival prediction: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.94-0.75) at 1-year, 0.74 (95% CI:0.84-0.64) at 3-year, and 0.72 (95% CI:0.84-0.61) at 5-year.

CONCLUSION

The CS Ratio may serve as a more effective prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer patients.

摘要

背景

肿瘤微环境(TME)在癌症进展中起关键作用,但其复杂结构以及患者间的显著变异性给研究带来了巨大挑战。最近的研究表明,由CXCL9与SPP1表达水平定义的巨噬细胞极化状态(CS比值)比传统的M1/M2标志物更具预后相关性。CS极化状态反映了一个高度协调的促肿瘤和抗肿瘤变量网络,为复杂的肿瘤微环境提供了一个简化而有效的免疫反应指标。CS比值已被证明与抗肿瘤免疫细胞的丰度、肿瘤浸润细胞的基因表达程序以及免疫治疗反应相关。宫颈癌是最常见的妇科恶性肿瘤之一,其治疗选择仍然有限。CXCL9是CXC趋化因子家族的成员,在免疫调节、炎症、肿瘤生长、血管生成和转移中起关键作用。同样,细胞因子SPP1通过调节干扰素-γ和白细胞介素-12等分子影响免疫相关途径。然而,尚无研究系统地探讨CS比值在宫颈癌中的作用或其与免疫治疗特征的关系。该领域的研究可为CS比值在宫颈癌及相关肿瘤中的作用和临床潜力提供关键见解。

方法

利用基因表达综合数据库(GEO)的数据,分析宫颈癌患者中CXCL9与SPP1的表达比值,结果显示存在显著差异。宫颈癌患者的数据来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据库。使用R语言中的maxstat软件包确定CS比值的最佳临界值,并构建Kaplan-Meier(KM)生存曲线。根据CS比值的中位数将患者分为高分组和低分组。分析免疫评分,并使用CIBERSORT评估免疫细胞浸润情况。评估不同病理T分期和国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期患者的CS比值差异。此外,使用R语言中的pROC软件包进行受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,以计算曲线下面积(AUC)。进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,以评估CS比值作为宫颈癌独立预后因素的潜力。随后为TCGA-CESC队列开发了一个基于Cox回归的列线图,整合了四个关键特征。使用校准曲线和ROC分析评估列线图的性能。

结果

与正常对照组相比,宫颈癌患者的CS比值显著降低(P < 0.05)。KM生存曲线表明,CS高分组患者的预后更好。免疫评分分析显示,与低分组相比,CS高分组的免疫评分显著更高(P < 0.05),肿瘤纯度显著更低(P < 0.05)。CIBERSORT分析显示,与低分组相比,CS高分组中CD8 + T细胞比例显著更高(P < 0.05),M1巨噬细胞比例显著更高(P < 0.05),M2巨噬细胞比例显著更低(P < 0.05)。随着FIGO分期的进展,CS比值显著降低(P < 0.05)。单因素(P < 0.05)和多因素Cox回归分析(P < 0.05)均证实CS比值是一个独立的预后因素。ROC分析表明,与单独的CXCL9或SPP1相比,CS比值在预测1年(AUC = 0.69)、3年(AUC = 0.66)和5年总生存期(AUC = 0.68)方面具有更高的AUC值。基于Cox回归的列线图整合四个关键特征,对CESC患者的1年、3年和5年总生存期具有预测能力(一致性指数 = 0.751;95%置信区间:0.678 - 0.824;p = 1.50×10 - 11)。根据列线图评分,高风险组和低风险组之间存在显著的生存差异。ROC分析在生存预测方面产生了较高的AUC值:1年时为0.85(95%置信区间:0.94 - 0.75),3年时为0.74(95%置信区间:0.84 - 0.64),5年时为0.72(95%置信区间:0.84 - 0.61)。

结论

CS比值可能是宫颈癌患者更有效的预后生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/4b02746064cd/fonc-15-1547529-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/b105b38cc016/fonc-15-1547529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/2bd63c07faf1/fonc-15-1547529-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/ae2483020a7b/fonc-15-1547529-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/3c647d18e396/fonc-15-1547529-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/3d1cc82dc882/fonc-15-1547529-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/4b02746064cd/fonc-15-1547529-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/b105b38cc016/fonc-15-1547529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/2bd63c07faf1/fonc-15-1547529-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/ae2483020a7b/fonc-15-1547529-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/3c647d18e396/fonc-15-1547529-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/3d1cc82dc882/fonc-15-1547529-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/570d/12420272/4b02746064cd/fonc-15-1547529-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.CS比率是宫颈癌的一种免疫相关预后生物标志物。
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 27;15:1547529. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1547529. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Interplay between tumor mutation burden and the tumor microenvironment predicts the prognosis of pan-cancer anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.肿瘤突变负荷与肿瘤微环境之间的相互作用可预测泛癌抗PD-1/PD-L1治疗的预后。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1557461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1557461. eCollection 2025.
6
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
A novel copper-induced cell death-related lncRNA prognostic signature associated with immune infiltration and clinical value in gastric cancer.一种新型铜诱导细胞死亡相关 lncRNA 预后标志物与胃癌免疫浸润和临床价值相关。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10543-10559. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04916-7. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
8
Characterization of novel anoikis-related genes as prognostic biomarkers and key determinants of the immune microenvironment in esophageal cancer.新型失巢凋亡相关基因作为食管癌预后生物标志物及免疫微环境关键决定因素的特征分析
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1599171. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1599171. eCollection 2025.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Development and validation of a Log odds of negative lymph nodes/T stage ratio-based prognostic model for gastric cancer.基于阴性淋巴结/肿瘤分期比值的胃癌对数优势预后模型的开发与验证
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 3;15:1554270. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1554270. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical Cancer Evades the Host Immune System through the Inhibition of Type I Interferon and CXCL9 by LIF.LIF 通过抑制Ⅰ型干扰素和 CXCL9 来逃避宿主免疫系统对宫颈癌的作用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 1;30(19):4505-4516. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0385.
2
Role of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Cervical Cancer: Integrating Classical Perspectives with Recent Technological Advances.肿瘤相关巨噬细胞在宫颈癌中的作用:将经典观点与最新技术进展相结合
Life (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;14(4):443. doi: 10.3390/life14040443.
3
macrophage polarity identifies a network of cellular programs that control human cancers.
巨噬细胞极性确定了一个控制人类癌症的细胞程序网络。
Science. 2023 Aug 4;381(6657):515-524. doi: 10.1126/science.ade2292. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
Comprehensive Analysis to Identify as a Prognostic Biomarker in Cervical Cancer.综合分析以确定其为宫颈癌的预后生物标志物。
Front Genet. 2022 Jan 4;12:732822. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.732822. eCollection 2021.
5
Chemokine-Directed Tumor Microenvironment Modulation in Cancer Immunotherapy.癌症免疫治疗中趋化因子导向的肿瘤微环境调节
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 10;22(18):9804. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189804.
6
Cytokine-chemokine network driven metastasis in esophageal cancer; promising avenue for targeted therapy.细胞因子-趋化因子网络驱动食管癌转移:靶向治疗的有前景途径。
Mol Cancer. 2021 Jan 4;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01294-3.
7
APOBEC: A molecular driver in cervical cancer pathogenesis.APOBEC:宫颈癌发病机制中的分子驱动因素。
Cancer Lett. 2021 Jan 1;496:104-116. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Tumor purity as a prognosis and immunotherapy relevant feature in gastric cancer.肿瘤纯度作为胃癌预后和免疫治疗相关特征。
Cancer Med. 2020 Dec;9(23):9052-9063. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3505. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
Polymorphisms in matricellular SPP1 and SPARC contribute to susceptibility to papillary thyroid cancer.基质细胞来源的 SPP1 和 SPARC 基因多态性与甲状腺乳头状癌易感性相关。
Genomics. 2020 Nov;112(6):4959-4967. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
CXCR3 Ligands in Cancer and Autoimmunity, Chemoattraction of Effector T Cells, and Beyond.CXCR3 配体在癌症和自身免疫中的作用、效应 T 细胞的趋化作用及其他。
Front Immunol. 2020 May 29;11:976. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00976. eCollection 2020.