Bertici Nicoleta Sorina, Cut Talida Georgiana, Ridichie Amalia, Manzur Andrei Raul, Bertici Razvan Adrian
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Infectious Diseases, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Center for Research and Innovation in Personalised Medicine of Respiratory Diseases, Pulmonology University Clinic, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 22;26(17):8117. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178117.
Tuberculosis and parasitic infections, including , frequently coexist in many regions worldwide, yet their interaction remains poorly understood. Tuberculosis triggers a type 1 immune response characterized by IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α production, while toxocariasis elicits a type 2 response, mediated by cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-33. The coexistence of these divergent immune pathways can disrupt immune regulation and impair the host's ability to control both infections, potentially leading to persistent hypereosinophilia. We illustrate this complex interplay through a real-world case involving a heavy smoker in whom infection likely reactivated latent tuberculosis, resulting in severe, unexplained hypereosinophilia and late-onset asthma with recurrent exacerbations. After excluding other causes and completing full antituberculosis therapy along with three courses of antiparasitic treatment and systemic corticosteroids, hypereosinophilia persisted. The introduction of benralizumab, a biologic therapy targeting IL-5Rα, led to a rapid reduction in eosinophils to normal ranges and significant clinical improvement. This case underscores the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges posed by the intersection of common infections and highlights that even a neglected parasitic infection such as toxocariasis can underlie severe respiratory complications with eosinophilia, where paradoxically biologic therapy may ultimately provide a very effective intervention.
结核病和寄生虫感染(包括 )在世界许多地区经常同时存在,但其相互作用仍知之甚少。结核病引发以产生白细胞介素-12、干扰素-γ和肿瘤坏死因子-α为特征的1型免疫反应,而弓蛔虫病引发由白细胞介素-4、白细胞介素-5、白细胞介素-13和白细胞介素-33等细胞因子介导的2型反应。这些不同免疫途径的共存会破坏免疫调节,损害宿主控制两种感染的能力,可能导致持续性嗜酸性粒细胞增多。我们通过一个实际病例来说明这种复杂的相互作用,该病例涉及一名重度吸烟者,其中 感染可能使潜伏性结核病重新激活,导致严重的、原因不明的嗜酸性粒细胞增多以及反复发作的迟发性哮喘。在排除其他原因并完成全程抗结核治疗以及三个疗程的抗寄生虫治疗和全身用糖皮质激素治疗后,嗜酸性粒细胞增多仍然存在。引入靶向白细胞介素-5受体α的生物疗法贝那利珠单抗后,嗜酸性粒细胞迅速减少至正常范围,并取得了显著的临床改善。该病例强调了常见感染交叉所带来的诊断和治疗挑战,并突出表明,即使是像弓蛔虫病这样被忽视的寄生虫感染也可能是嗜酸性粒细胞增多导致严重呼吸道并发症的基础,在这种情况下,生物疗法最终可能提供非常有效的干预措施。