Wang Qi, Librizzi Damiano, Bagheri Shamim, Ebrahimifard Ali, Hojjat Shamami Azimeh, Rinke Anja, Eilsberger Friederike, Luster Markus, Hooshyar Yousefi Behrooz
Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Philipps Universität Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital OWL, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Sep 2;26(17):8539. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178539.
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare and heterogeneous class of neoplastic lesions, but their prevalence has increased significantly over the past three decades. These tumors are aggressive and difficult to treat. Improving diagnostic efficiency and treatment effectiveness is important for patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Radiopharmaceutical therapeutic diagnostics combines diagnosis and treatment technology and has broad prospects in precision medicine, especially for the early diagnosis and treatment of tumors. To compare the diagnostic advantages of radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists for liver metastases from NETs and the disease control rate in NET patients. Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to 29 October 2024. Clinical trials of somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists for NET diagnosis or treatment. Following PRISMA guidelines, data were independently extracted by two researchers. Pooled diagnostic or treatment effects and 95% CIs were reported using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Effect of somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists in detecting liver metastases and disease control rate. Risk Ratio (RR) for liver metastasis detection and Effect Size (ES) for disease control rate were calculated. From 5291 articles, 52 were included in the meta-analysis. Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists were significantly more effective than agonists in detecting liver lesions (RR = 11.57, 95% CI: 4.10, 32.67). Disease control rates were higher with antagonists (ES = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.96) compared to agonists (ES = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.85, z = 2.12, = 0.03). Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists outperform agonists in diagnosing hepatic lesions and controlling disease in NETs, highlighting their clinical superiority. This meta-analysis provides critical insights into the diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of somatostatin receptor antagonists, and may offer a potential paradigm shift in the management of neuroendocrine tumors. Nevertheless, the smaller number of studies on antagonists may limit the generalizability of the findings and underscore the need for further clinical trials to validate these results.
神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)是一类罕见且异质性的肿瘤性病变,但在过去三十年中其发病率显著增加。这些肿瘤具有侵袭性且难以治疗。提高神经内分泌肿瘤患者的诊断效率和治疗效果至关重要。放射性药物治疗诊断结合了诊断和治疗技术,在精准医学中具有广阔前景,尤其对于肿瘤的早期诊断和治疗。为比较放射性标记的生长抑素受体激动剂和拮抗剂对NETs肝转移的诊断优势以及NET患者的疾病控制率。系统检索截至2024年10月29日的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Ovid、Scopus和Web of Science数据库。关于生长抑素受体激动剂和拮抗剂用于NET诊断或治疗的临床试验。按照PRISMA指南,由两名研究人员独立提取数据。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型报告汇总的诊断或治疗效果及95%置信区间。生长抑素受体激动剂和拮抗剂在检测肝转移及疾病控制率方面的效果。计算肝转移检测的风险比(RR)和疾病控制率的效应量(ES)。从5291篇文章中,52篇被纳入荟萃分析。放射性标记的生长抑素受体拮抗剂在检测肝脏病变方面比激动剂显著更有效(RR = 11.57,95% CI:4.10,32.67)。与激动剂(ES = 0.82,95% CI:0.78,0.85,z = 2.12,P = 0.03)相比,拮抗剂的疾病控制率更高(ES = 0.90,95% CI:0.83,0.96)。放射性标记的生长抑素受体拮抗剂在诊断NETs的肝脏病变和控制疾病方面优于激动剂,突出了它们的临床优势。这项荟萃分析为生长抑素受体拮抗剂的诊断和治疗效果提供了关键见解,可能为神经内分泌肿瘤的管理带来潜在的范式转变。然而,关于拮抗剂的研究数量较少可能会限制研究结果的普遍性,并强调需要进一步的临床试验来验证这些结果。