Kurz Thomas, Schmidt Jacob, Lichy Isabel, Goranova Irena, Jeutner Jonathan, Biernath Nadine, Kurz Lukas, Schlomm Thorsten, Peters Robert, Friedersdorff Frank, Plage Henning, Ralla Bernhard
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Urology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 29;14(17):6121. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176121.
The presence of multiple renal arteries (MRAs) is a common anatomical variant in living kidney donors. While MRAs are not considered a contraindication to donation, it remains uncertain whether leaving the donor with a kidney containing MRAs affects long-term outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate renal and clinical outcomes in donors based on the vascular anatomy of the remnant kidney. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors who underwent nephrectomy at our institution between 2011 and 2016. Donors were categorized according to the vascular anatomy of the remaining kidney: single renal artery (SRA) vs. multiple renal arteries (MRAs). Data on renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular events were collected at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcome was long-term renal function, which was measured by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Secondary outcomes included clinical comorbidities and postoperative complications. Among 190 donors, 132 had a remaining kidney with a single artery and 58 had MRAs. Over a median follow-up of 89.5 months (SRA) and 74.5 months (MRA), there were no significant differences in eGFR (SRA: 66 mL/min vs. MRA: 65 mL/min, = 0.60), serum creatinine ( = 0.86), or the incidence of hypertension (31.8% vs. 34.5%, = 0.35). Rates of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular events were similarly low and comparable between groups. Living kidney donors left with a remnant kidney containing multiple renal arteries have similar long-term renal function and clinical outcomes as those with a single renal artery. These findings support the feasibility of MRA retention in donor selection and contribute to evidence-based surgical planning and donor counseling.
多条肾动脉(MRAs)的存在是活体肾供体中常见的解剖变异。虽然MRAs不被视为捐赠的禁忌症,但保留给供体一个含有MRAs的肾脏是否会影响长期预后仍不确定。本研究旨在根据残余肾脏的血管解剖结构评估供体的肾脏和临床预后。我们对2011年至2016年在我们机构接受肾切除术的活体肾供体进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据剩余肾脏的血管解剖结构对供体进行分类:单条肾动脉(SRA)与多条肾动脉(MRAs)。在基线和随访时收集肾功能、高血压、糖尿病和心血管事件的数据。主要结局是长期肾功能,通过估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)来衡量。次要结局包括临床合并症和术后并发症。在190名供体中,132名剩余肾脏有单条动脉,58名有MRAs。在中位随访89.5个月(SRA)和74.5个月(MRA)期间,eGFR(SRA:66 mL/分钟 vs. MRA:65 mL/分钟,P = 0.60)、血清肌酐(P = 0.86)或高血压发生率(31.8% vs. 34.5%,P = 0.35)没有显著差异。糖尿病和心血管事件的发生率同样较低,且两组之间具有可比性。保留有多个肾动脉的残余肾脏的活体肾供体与有单条肾动脉的供体具有相似的长期肾功能和临床结局。这些发现支持了在供体选择中保留MRAs的可行性,并有助于基于证据的手术规划和供体咨询。