Terranova Corrado, Schiavoni Lorenzo, Plotti Francesco, Costa Fabio, Feole Laura, Rampello Stefania, Ficarola Fernando, Montera Roberto, Guzzo Federica, Luvero Daniela, Di Donato Violante, Mattei Alessia, Angioli Roberto, De Cicco Nardone Carlo
Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Research Unit of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 31;14(17):6163. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176163.
: Laparoscopic gynecologic surgery is widely utilized due to its minimally invasive nature. Postoperative discomfort, including intra-abdominal and referred shoulder pain, remains a challenge. This study evaluates the impact of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversed with sugammadex compared to moderate NMB reversed with neostigmine on postoperative pain, recovery, and surgical conditions in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. : This double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 228 patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy under standardized pneumoperitoneum pressure (12 mmHg). Participants were randomized into two groups: deep NMB with sugammadex (SUG) and moderate NMB with neostigmine (NEO). Primary outcomes included postoperative pain (NRS) and neuromuscular recovery time (TOF ratio ≥ 0.9). Secondary outcomes were surgical conditions, surgeon satisfaction, extubation and recovery times, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and analgesic consumption. : The SUG group exhibited lower pain scores up to 24 h compared to the NEO group ( < 0.05). Pain reductions remained statistically significant up to 6 h postoperatively after Bonferroni correction, while differences beyond this time were not significant after adjustment. Neuromuscular recovery was markedly faster in the SUG group (147.58 ± 82.26 s vs. 488.02 ± 223.07 s, < 0.05). Patients in the SUG group had shorter extubation (ΔT1), awakening (ΔT2), and recovery room transfer times (ΔT3). PONV was significantly lower in the SUG group. Deep NMB did not contribute to the improvement of surgical workspace conditions. : Deep NMB with sugammadex enhances postoperative pain control and accelerates neuromuscular recovery in laparoscopic hysterectomy. These findings support the adoption of deep NMB with sugammadex as a valid anesthetic approach in laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.
腹腔镜妇科手术因其微创性而被广泛应用。术后不适,包括腹腔内疼痛和牵涉性肩痛,仍然是一个挑战。本研究评估了与用新斯的明逆转的中度神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)相比,用舒更葡糖逆转的深度神经肌肉阻滞对接受腹腔镜子宫切除术患者术后疼痛、恢复情况及手术条件的影响。
本双盲、随机对照试验纳入了228例在标准化气腹压力(12 mmHg)下接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者。参与者被随机分为两组:用舒更葡糖进行深度NMB(SUG组)和用新斯的明进行中度NMB(NEO组)。主要结局包括术后疼痛(数字评分量表[NRS])和神经肌肉恢复时间(四个成串刺激[TOF]比值≥0.9)。次要结局为手术条件、外科医生满意度、拔管和恢复时间、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率及镇痛药用量。
与NEO组相比,SUG组在长达24小时内的疼痛评分更低(P<0.05)。经Bonferroni校正后,术后长达6小时疼痛减轻仍具有统计学意义,而在此时间之后调整后的差异无统计学意义。SUG组的神经肌肉恢复明显更快(147.58±82.26秒对488.02±223.07秒,P<0.05)。SUG组患者的拔管时间(ΔT1)、苏醒时间(ΔT2)和转入恢复室时间(ΔT3)更短。SUG组的PONV明显更低。深度NMB对手术操作空间条件的改善无作用。
用舒更葡糖进行深度NMB可增强腹腔镜子宫切除术后的疼痛控制并加速神经肌肉恢复。这些发现支持将用舒更葡糖进行深度NMB作为腹腔镜子宫切除术有效的麻醉方法。