Suppr超能文献

米非司酮 - 米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇治疗辅助生殖技术(ART)后及自然受孕早期稽留流产的疗效比较

Mifepristone-Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Early Missed Miscarriage After ART and Spontaneously Conceived Pregnancies.

作者信息

Dayan-Schwartz Adi, Vinitski Revital, Hassan Haya, Izhaki Ido, Abd Elgani Suzan, Kogan Liron, Baram Shira, Zbidat Firas, Seh Khadeje, Zafran Noah, Reiss Ari, Beck-Fruchter Ronit

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emek Medical Center, Afula 1834111, Israel.

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 8;14(17):6340. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176340.

Abstract

: Missed miscarriage (MM) is a common first-trimester complication. Misoprostol alone achieves moderate success, while combination therapy with mifepristone improves outcomes in spontaneous pregnancies. Evidence in assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies is scarce. We evaluated whether combined mifepristone-misoprostol improves outcomes in ART pregnancies compared with misoprostol alone and compared results with spontaneously conceived (SC) pregnancies. : This retrospective matched cohort study was conducted at a single center (2017-2024). ART pregnancies were matched 1:2 with SC pregnancies by maternal age. Patients received misoprostol alone or 200 mg mifepristone followed 48 h later by misoprostol. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as complete uterine evacuation without repeat misoprostol or surgery. Secondary outcomes included emergency visits, surgical procedures, and ART-related predictors. Subgroup analyses were performed by ART protocol. : Among 307 patients (94 ART, 213 SC), combined therapy yielded higher success than misoprostol alone in SC (84% vs. 71%, = 0.023) and ART pregnancies (95% vs. 80%, = 0.035). In hormonally supported frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) cycles, success was 100% with combined therapy versus 80% with misoprostol alone. : Combined mifepristone-misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone, with particularly high success in HRT-FET cycles.

摘要

稽留流产(MM)是常见的孕早期并发症。单独使用米索前列醇成功率中等,而米非司酮联合治疗可改善自然妊娠的结局。辅助生殖技术(ART)妊娠方面的证据较少。我们评估了米非司酮联合米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇相比,是否能改善ART妊娠的结局,并将结果与自然受孕(SC)妊娠进行比较。

本回顾性匹配队列研究在单一中心进行(2017 - 2024年)。ART妊娠按产妇年龄与SC妊娠以1:2进行匹配。患者单独接受米索前列醇治疗,或先服用200毫克米非司酮,48小时后再服用米索前列醇。主要结局为治疗成功,定义为子宫完全排空,无需重复使用米索前列醇或手术。次要结局包括急诊就诊、手术操作及ART相关预测因素。按ART方案进行亚组分析。

在307例患者(94例ART妊娠,213例SC妊娠)中,联合治疗在SC妊娠(84% vs. 71%,P = 0.023)和ART妊娠(95% vs. 80%,P = 0.035)中的成功率均高于单独使用米索前列醇。在激素支持的冻融胚胎移植(HRT - FET)周期中,联合治疗的成功率为100%,而单独使用米索前列醇为80%。

米非司酮联合米索前列醇比单独使用米索前列醇更有效,在HRT - FET周期中成功率尤其高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e2a/12429718/52143e272f2a/jcm-14-06340-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
3
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 24;5(5):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub5.
4
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub3.
5
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub2.
6
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub4.
7
Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 13;5(5):CD013525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013525.pub2.
8
Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Early Pregnancy Loss With Mifepristone and Misoprostol Compared With Misoprostol Only.
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb 1;145(2):204-209. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005800. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
A Lexicon for First-Trimester US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;232(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.038. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Medical treatment for early pregnancy loss following in vitro fertilization compared to spontaneous pregnancies.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2137-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07423-3. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Comparison of mifepristone plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone for first trimester medical abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 6;4:1112392. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1112392. eCollection 2023.
6
Mifepristone-misoprostol combination treatment for early pregnancy loss after embryo transfer: a case series.
F S Rep. 2023 Jan 20;4(1):93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.01.003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Potential role of the corpus luteum in maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy and preeclampsia risk.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):683-699. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
9
Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss.
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1658-1667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验