• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米非司酮 - 米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇治疗辅助生殖技术(ART)后及自然受孕早期稽留流产的疗效比较

Mifepristone-Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Early Missed Miscarriage After ART and Spontaneously Conceived Pregnancies.

作者信息

Dayan-Schwartz Adi, Vinitski Revital, Hassan Haya, Izhaki Ido, Abd Elgani Suzan, Kogan Liron, Baram Shira, Zbidat Firas, Seh Khadeje, Zafran Noah, Reiss Ari, Beck-Fruchter Ronit

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emek Medical Center, Afula 1834111, Israel.

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 8;14(17):6340. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176340.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14176340
PMID:40944098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12429718/
Abstract

: Missed miscarriage (MM) is a common first-trimester complication. Misoprostol alone achieves moderate success, while combination therapy with mifepristone improves outcomes in spontaneous pregnancies. Evidence in assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies is scarce. We evaluated whether combined mifepristone-misoprostol improves outcomes in ART pregnancies compared with misoprostol alone and compared results with spontaneously conceived (SC) pregnancies. : This retrospective matched cohort study was conducted at a single center (2017-2024). ART pregnancies were matched 1:2 with SC pregnancies by maternal age. Patients received misoprostol alone or 200 mg mifepristone followed 48 h later by misoprostol. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as complete uterine evacuation without repeat misoprostol or surgery. Secondary outcomes included emergency visits, surgical procedures, and ART-related predictors. Subgroup analyses were performed by ART protocol. : Among 307 patients (94 ART, 213 SC), combined therapy yielded higher success than misoprostol alone in SC (84% vs. 71%, = 0.023) and ART pregnancies (95% vs. 80%, = 0.035). In hormonally supported frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) cycles, success was 100% with combined therapy versus 80% with misoprostol alone. : Combined mifepristone-misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone, with particularly high success in HRT-FET cycles.

摘要

稽留流产(MM)是常见的孕早期并发症。单独使用米索前列醇成功率中等,而米非司酮联合治疗可改善自然妊娠的结局。辅助生殖技术(ART)妊娠方面的证据较少。我们评估了米非司酮联合米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇相比,是否能改善ART妊娠的结局,并将结果与自然受孕(SC)妊娠进行比较。

本回顾性匹配队列研究在单一中心进行(2017 - 2024年)。ART妊娠按产妇年龄与SC妊娠以1:2进行匹配。患者单独接受米索前列醇治疗,或先服用200毫克米非司酮,48小时后再服用米索前列醇。主要结局为治疗成功,定义为子宫完全排空,无需重复使用米索前列醇或手术。次要结局包括急诊就诊、手术操作及ART相关预测因素。按ART方案进行亚组分析。

在307例患者(94例ART妊娠,213例SC妊娠)中,联合治疗在SC妊娠(84% vs. 71%,P = 0.023)和ART妊娠(95% vs. 80%,P = 0.035)中的成功率均高于单独使用米索前列醇。在激素支持的冻融胚胎移植(HRT - FET)周期中,联合治疗的成功率为100%,而单独使用米索前列醇为80%。

米非司酮联合米索前列醇比单独使用米索前列醇更有效,在HRT - FET周期中成功率尤其高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e2a/12429718/52143e272f2a/jcm-14-06340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e2a/12429718/52143e272f2a/jcm-14-06340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e2a/12429718/52143e272f2a/jcm-14-06340-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mifepristone-Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Early Missed Miscarriage After ART and Spontaneously Conceived Pregnancies.米非司酮 - 米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇治疗辅助生殖技术(ART)后及自然受孕早期稽留流产的疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 8;14(17):6340. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176340.
2
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.流产管理方法:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
3
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.医学方法终止早期妊娠。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 24;5(5):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub5.
4
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub3.
5
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub2.
6
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub4.
7
Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation.孕 14 周前药物流产的疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 13;5(5):CD013525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013525.pub2.
8
Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.孕中期终止妊娠的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2.
9
Effectiveness and acceptability of a 24-h interval versus a 48-h interval between mifepristone intake and misoprostol administration for in-hospital abortion at 9-20 gestational weeks: an international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.米非司酮服用与米索前列醇给药间隔24小时与48小时用于9 - 20孕周住院流产的有效性和可接受性:一项国际、开放标签、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jan;13(1):e112-e120. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00416-9.
10
Termination of second-trimester pregnancy by mifepristone combined with misoprostol versus intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate (Rivanol®): a systematic review of Chinese trials.米非司酮联合米索前列醇终止中期妊娠与乳酸依沙吖啶(利凡诺)羊膜腔内注射的比较:一项中国试验的系统评价。
Contraception. 2011 Sep;84(3):214-23. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.018. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Early Pregnancy Loss With Mifepristone and Misoprostol Compared With Misoprostol Only.米非司酮与米索前列醇联合治疗早期妊娠流产与单纯使用米索前列醇的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb 1;145(2):204-209. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005800. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
A Lexicon for First-Trimester US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations.早孕期超声检查术语词典:超声放射学会共识会议推荐意见
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;232(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.038. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Medical treatment for early pregnancy loss following in vitro fertilization compared to spontaneous pregnancies.
体外受精后早期妊娠丢失的医学治疗与自然妊娠的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2137-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07423-3. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
4
Retrospective cohort study comparing success of medical management of early pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived with and without medical assistance.回顾性队列研究比较了有和没有医疗辅助受孕的早期妊娠丢失的药物治疗成功率。
Fertil Steril. 2024 May;121(5):824-831. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
5
Comparison of mifepristone plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone for first trimester medical abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.米非司酮联合米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇用于孕早期药物流产的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 6;4:1112392. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1112392. eCollection 2023.
6
Mifepristone-misoprostol combination treatment for early pregnancy loss after embryo transfer: a case series.米非司酮-米索前列醇联合治疗胚胎移植后早期妊娠丢失:病例系列
F S Rep. 2023 Jan 20;4(1):93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.01.003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Potential role of the corpus luteum in maternal cardiovascular adaptation to pregnancy and preeclampsia risk.黄体在母体心血管适应妊娠和子痫前期风险中的潜在作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):683-699. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
8
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.流产管理方法:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
9
Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss.流产不容忽视:早期妊娠丢失的流行病学、身体、心理和经济成本。
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1658-1667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
10
Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.米非司酮联合米索前列醇与单用米索前列醇治疗稽留流产(MifeMiso)的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Sep 12;396(10253):770-778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31788-8. Epub 2020 Aug 24.