• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕中期终止妊娠的医学方法。

Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.

作者信息

Wildschut Hajo, Both Marieke I, Medema Suzanne, Thomee Eeke, Wildhagen Mark F, Kapp Nathalie

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3000 CA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2
PMID:21249669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8557267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the improvement of ultrasound technology, the likelihood of detection of major fetal structural anomalies in mid-pregnancy has increased considerably. Upon the detection of serious anomalies, women typically are offered the option of pregnancy termination. Additionally, there are still many reasons other than fetal anomalies why women seek abortion in the mid-trimester.

OBJECTIVES

To compare different methods of second trimester medical termination of pregnancy for their efficacy and side-effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Popline and reference lists of retrieved papers and other sources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining medical regimens for termination of pregnancy of a singleton living fetus between 12-28 weeks' gestation were analysed. The outcome measures were the induction to abortion interval, abortion rate within 24 hours, need for surgical evacuation, blood loss, uterine rupture, pain, and side-effects.Trials including >20% fetal death, multiple pregnancies, previous uterine scars and regimens which involved cervical preparation were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors selected the trials and three authors extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourty RCTs were included, addressing various agents for pregnancy termination and methods of administration. When used alone, misoprostol was an effective inductive agent, though it appeared to be more effective in combination with mifepristone. However, the evidence from RCTs is limited.Misoprostol was preferably administered vaginally, although among multiparous women sublingual administration appeared equally effective. A range of doses of vaginally administered misoprostol has been used. No randomised trials comparing doses of misoprostol were identified; however low doses of misoprostol appear to be associated with fewer side-effects while moderate doses appear to be more efficient in completing abortion. Four RCTs showed that the induction to abortion interval with 3-hourly vaginal administration of prostaglandins is shorter than 6-hourly administration without an increase in side-effects.Many studies reported the need for surgical evacuation. Indications for surgical evacuation include retained products of the placenta and heavy vaginal bleeding. Fewer women required surgical evacuation when misoprostol was administrated vaginally compared with women receiving intra-amniotical PGF(2a) . Mild, self-limiting diarrhoea was more common among women who received misoprostol compared to other agents.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Medical abortion in the second trimester using the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol appeared to have the highest efficacy and shortest abortion time interval. Where mifepristone is not available, misoprostol alone is a reasonable alternative. The optimal route for administering misoprostol is vaginally, preferably using tablets at 3-hourly intervals. Apart from pain, the side-effects of vaginal misoprostol are usually mild and self limiting. Conclusions from this review are limited by the gestational age ranges and variable medical regimens, including dosing, administrative routes and intervals of medication, of the included trials.

摘要

背景

随着超声技术的进步,孕中期检测出主要胎儿结构异常的可能性显著增加。一旦检测到严重异常,通常会为女性提供终止妊娠的选择。此外,除了胎儿异常外,还有许多其他原因导致女性在孕中期寻求堕胎。

目的

比较孕中期药物终止妊娠的不同方法的疗效和副作用。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆)、MEDLINE、Popline以及检索到的论文和其他来源的参考文献列表。

选择标准

分析了所有研究妊娠12 - 28周单活胎终止妊娠药物方案的随机对照试验(RCT)。结局指标包括引产至流产间隔时间、24小时内流产率、手术清宫需求、失血量、子宫破裂、疼痛和副作用。排除胎儿死亡>20%、多胎妊娠、既往子宫瘢痕以及涉及宫颈准备的方案的试验。

数据收集与分析

两名作者选择试验,三名作者提取数据。

主要结果

纳入了40项RCT,涉及各种终止妊娠的药物和给药方法。单独使用时,米索前列醇是一种有效的引产药物,不过与米非司酮联合使用似乎更有效。然而,RCT的证据有限。米索前列醇最好经阴道给药,尽管在经产妇中舌下给药似乎同样有效。已使用了一系列经阴道给药的米索前列醇剂量。未发现比较米索前列醇剂量的随机试验;然而,低剂量米索前列醇似乎副作用较少,而中等剂量在完成流产方面似乎更有效。四项RCT表明,每3小时经阴道给予前列腺素的引产至流产间隔时间比每6小时给药短,且副作用未增加。许多研究报告了手术清宫的需求。手术清宫的指征包括胎盘组织残留和大量阴道出血。与接受羊膜腔内注射前列腺素F2α的女性相比,经阴道给予米索前列醇的女性需要手术清宫的较少。与其他药物相比,接受米索前列醇的女性中轻度、自限性腹泻更为常见。

作者结论

孕中期使用米非司酮和米索前列醇联合进行药物流产似乎疗效最高且流产时间间隔最短。如果没有米非司酮,单独使用米索前列醇是一个合理的选择。米索前列醇的最佳给药途径是经阴道,最好每3小时使用片剂。除疼痛外,经阴道使用米索前列醇的副作用通常较轻且为自限性。本综述的结论受到纳入试验的孕周范围以及包括给药剂量、给药途径和用药间隔在内的可变药物方案的限制。

相似文献

1
Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.孕中期终止妊娠的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2.
2
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub3.
3
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub2.
4
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.孕早期人工流产的医学方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub4.
5
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.医学方法终止早期妊娠。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 24;5(5):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub5.
6
Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion.孕早期人工流产的宫颈准备
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD007207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007207.pub2.
7
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.流产管理方法:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
8
Cervical preparation for dilation and evacuation at 12 to 24 weeks gestation.妊娠12至24周时扩张和清宫术的宫颈准备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 3;3(3):CD007310. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007310.pub3.
9
Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation.孕 14 周前药物流产的疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 13;5(5):CD013525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013525.pub2.
10
Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.有剖宫产史的女性足月引产方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 9;6(6):CD009792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical versus medical methods for second-trimester induced abortion.孕中期人工流产的手术方法与药物方法对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 8;7:CD006714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub3.
2
The efficacy of mifepristone-misoprostol regimen versus misoprostol-only for medication abortion at 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks' gestation.米非司酮 - 米索前列醇方案与单纯米索前列醇用于妊娠22⁺⁰/⁷至30⁺⁰/⁷周药物流产的疗效比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;311(3):749-756. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07737-2. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
3
Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15-24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study.低收入和中等收入国家妊娠15 - 24周时扩张和清宫术与药物流产的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Contracept X. 2024 Aug 8;6:100110. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100110. eCollection 2024.
4
Efficacy and safety of isosorbide mononitrate plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of the first and second trimester abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.硝酸异山梨酯联合米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇在处理第一和第二孕期流产中的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06614-9.
5
Have we overlooked the role of mifepristone for the medical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy?我们是否忽视了米非司酮在输卵管异位妊娠的药物治疗中的作用?
Hum Reprod. 2023 Aug 1;38(8):1445-1448. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead116.
6
Factors Influencing the Duration of Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomaly with Mifepristone in Combination with Misoprostol.米非司酮联合米索前列醇用于胎儿畸形终止妊娠的时间影响因素
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 21;12(3):869. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030869.
7
Medical abortion at 13 or more weeks gestation provided through telemedicine: A retrospective review of services.通过远程医疗提供的妊娠13周及以上的药物流产:服务回顾性研究
Contracept X. 2021 Jan 25;3:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100057. eCollection 2021.
8
Medical regimens for abortion at 12 weeks and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕12周及以上流产的医学治疗方案:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Contracept X. 2020 Aug 20;2:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100037. eCollection 2020.
9
Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial).米非司酮联合米索前列醇与单独应用米索前列醇用于早孕失败后清宫术的随机双盲安慰剂对照比较研究方案(Triple M 试验)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2497-y.
10
Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Ethacridine Lactate and Oxytocin for Second Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Trial.米非司酮序贯米索前列醇或乳酸依沙吖啶与缩宫素用于中期妊娠引产:一项随机试验
Eurasian J Med. 2019 Oct;51(3):262-266. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.18341. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Mifepristone combined with misoprostol versus intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate for the termination of second trimester pregnancy: a prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial.米非司酮联合米索前列醇与乳酸依沙吖啶羊膜腔内注射用于终止中期妊娠的前瞻性、开放标签、随机临床试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Aug;151(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.04.004.
2
A comparison of low-dose and high-dose protocols of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy.米索前列醇阴道给药低剂量与高剂量方案用于孕中期终止妊娠的比较。
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2009;36(4):245-7.
3
Prenatal diagnosis and abortion for congenital abnormalities: is it ethical to provide one without the other?先天性异常的产前诊断与流产:只提供其中一项而不提供另一项是否符合伦理道德?
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Aug;9(8):48-56. doi: 10.1080/15265160902984996.
4
Mifepristone followed by high-dose oxytocin drip for second-trimester abortion: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study.米非司酮联合大剂量缩宫素静脉滴注用于孕中期引产:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的前瞻性研究
J Reprod Med. 2009 Aug;54(8):511-6.
5
Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: a systematic review.米索前列醇用于有剖宫产史妇女的中期妊娠终止:一项系统评价
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1151-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02190.x. Epub 2009 May 11.
6
Sublingual misoprostol 100 microgram versus 200 microgram for second trimester abortion: a randomised trial.孕中期流产时舌下含服100微克与200微克米索前列醇的比较:一项随机试验。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009 Feb;14(1):55-60. doi: 10.1080/13625180802360865.
7
Vaginal versus oral misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination: a randomized trial.阴道用米索前列醇与口服米索前列醇用于孕中期终止妊娠的随机试验
Pak J Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 1;11(21):2505-8. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.2505.2508.
8
A randomized trial to compare two dosing intervals of misoprostol following mifepristone administration in second trimester medical abortion.一项在孕中期药物流产中比较米非司酮给药后米索前列醇两种给药间隔的随机试验。
Hum Reprod. 2009 Feb;24(2):320-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den425. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
9
Mifepristone and misoprostol versus Dilapan and sulprostone for second trimester termination of pregnancy.米非司酮与米索前列醇对比地拉那普明与硫前列酮用于中期妊娠终止
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Nov;21(11):847-51. doi: 10.1080/14767050802283027.
10
Comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for second trimester abortion: randomized controlled equivalence trial.米索前列醇经阴道与舌下含服用于孕中期流产的比较:随机对照等效性试验
Hum Reprod. 2009 Jan;24(1):106-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den328. Epub 2008 Sep 14.