• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机械增强结肠镜检查改善结直肠癌筛查期间息肉检测:一项真实世界医疗数据库分析

Use of Mechanical Enhanced Colonoscopy to Improve Polyp Detection During Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Real-World Healthcare Database Analysis.

作者信息

Cheloff Abraham Z, Gross Seth A

机构信息

NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 8;14(17):6346. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176346.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14176346
PMID:40944105
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12429699/
Abstract

High performance colonoscopy requires the monitoring of an individual's adenoma detection rate (ADR). The Endocuff (EndoCuff Vision, Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA, USA) is an endoscopic distal attachment device that increases surface area exposure during colonoscopy. While studies have shown that Endocuff increased ADR, real-world data is limited on its effectiveness. The Premiere Health Database was reviewed from 2018 to 2021 to identify patients 50 years of age or older who had a screening colonoscopy. A keyword search for "Endocuff" was used to determine if Endocuff was utilized, and ICD10 codes were analyzed to determine if a polyp was found. Our primary outcome was a polyp detection rate (PDR) for Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC). Secondary outcomes included an estimated adenoma detection rate (eADR). Logistic regression modeling was performed to examine the difference in PDR between the EAC and SC groups after controlling for baseline characteristics, insurance type, and provider experience. Gastroenterologists performed 893,560 screening colonoscopies, of which 0.7% were Endocuff-assisted, while surgeons performed 234,962 screening colonoscopies and 0.5% were Endocuff-assisted. PDR was higher with EAC for both gastroenterologists (72.0% vs. 57.4%) and surgeons (55.6% vs. 43.7%), with eADR following similar trends. The odds ratio of polyp detection with vs. without Endocuff was 1.91 for gastroenterologists and 1.62 for surgeons. After adjusting for patient and provider factors, the adjusted odds ratios are 2.01 and 1.61, respectively. While Endocuff utilization remains low, this large study using real-world data demonstrates the ability to improve eADR by over 10% compared to standard colonoscopy.

摘要

高效的结肠镜检查需要监测个体的腺瘤检出率(ADR)。Endocuff(EndoCuff Vision,美国奥林巴斯美国公司,宾夕法尼亚州中心谷)是一种内镜远端附着装置,可在结肠镜检查期间增加表面积暴露。虽然研究表明Endocuff提高了ADR,但其实际效果的真实世界数据有限。对2018年至2021年的Premiere健康数据库进行了回顾,以确定年龄在50岁及以上接受筛查结肠镜检查的患者。使用关键词搜索“Endocuff”来确定是否使用了Endocuff,并分析ICD10编码以确定是否发现息肉。我们的主要结局是Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查(EAC)和标准结肠镜检查(SC)的息肉检出率(PDR)。次要结局包括估计的腺瘤检出率(eADR)。在控制基线特征、保险类型和提供者经验后,进行逻辑回归建模以检查EAC组和SC组之间PDR的差异。胃肠病学家进行了893,560例筛查结肠镜检查,其中0.7%为Endocuff辅助检查,而外科医生进行了234,962例筛查结肠镜检查,0.5%为Endocuff辅助检查。对于胃肠病学家(72.0%对57.4%)和外科医生(55.6%对43.7%),EAC的PDR均更高,eADR也呈现类似趋势。使用Endocuff与未使用Endocuff相比,胃肠病学家息肉检出的优势比为1.91,外科医生为1.62。在调整患者和提供者因素后,调整后的优势比分别为2.01和1.61。虽然Endocuff的使用率仍然较低,但这项使用真实世界数据的大型研究表明,与标准结肠镜检查相比,Endocuff能够将eADR提高超过10%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/230d70b40efc/jcm-14-06346-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/15f31eec3d15/jcm-14-06346-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/e88910d47751/jcm-14-06346-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/ba9e2db40a77/jcm-14-06346-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/230d70b40efc/jcm-14-06346-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/15f31eec3d15/jcm-14-06346-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/e88910d47751/jcm-14-06346-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/ba9e2db40a77/jcm-14-06346-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff5/12429699/230d70b40efc/jcm-14-06346-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Mechanical Enhanced Colonoscopy to Improve Polyp Detection During Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Real-World Healthcare Database Analysis.使用机械增强结肠镜检查改善结直肠癌筛查期间息肉检测:一项真实世界医疗数据库分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 8;14(17):6346. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176346.
2
The effect of the endoscopic device Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™ on quality standards in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.内镜设备Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™对结肠镜检查质量标准的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):573-585. doi: 10.1111/codi.16444. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Assist Devices on Colonic Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis.内镜辅助设备对结直肠腺瘤检测效果的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56(10):889-894. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001643. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Linked color imaging versus conventional white-light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.联合彩色成像与传统白光结肠镜检查在结直肠息肉检测中的应用比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 19;8(8):CD015476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015476.pub2.
6
Polyp detection with colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius artificial intelligence endoscopy module compared with standard colonoscopy in routine colonoscopy practice (COLO-DETECT): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial.基于 GI Genius 人工智能内镜模块的结肠镜辅助下息肉检测与常规结肠镜检查比较(COLO-DETECT):一项多中心、开放标签、平行臂、实用随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;9(10):911-923. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00161-4. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
7
Endocuff Vision-Assisted Colonoscopy Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection in a Shorter Withdrawal Time Compared with Standard Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.与标准结肠镜检查相比,Endocuff视觉辅助结肠镜检查在更短的退镜时间内显著提高腺瘤检出率:一项随机对照试验。
Digestion. 2025;106(4):327-337. doi: 10.1159/000543630. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
8
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
9
Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中注水与注气的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 26;2015(5):CD009863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009863.pub2.
10
Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.检测炎症性肠病患者结肠癌和/或发育异常的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
GI Genius increases small and right-sided adenoma and sessile serrated lesion detection rate when used with EndoCuff in a real-world setting: a retrospective United States study.在真实环境中,GI Genius与EndoCuff联合使用时可提高小腺瘤、右侧腺瘤及无蒂锯齿状病变的检出率:一项美国回顾性研究。
Clin Endosc. 2025 May;58(3):438-447. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.271. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Endocuff Vision-Assisted Colonoscopy Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection in a Shorter Withdrawal Time Compared with Standard Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.与标准结肠镜检查相比,Endocuff视觉辅助结肠镜检查在更短的退镜时间内显著提高腺瘤检出率:一项随机对照试验。
Digestion. 2025;106(4):327-337. doi: 10.1159/000543630. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.
结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Sep;100(3):352-381. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2905. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
4
Relative Efficacies of Interventions to Improve the Quality of Screening-Related Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.干预措施提高筛查相关结肠镜检查质量的相对疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Aug;167(3):560-590. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
5
Endocuff With or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的疗效分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 1;119(7):1318-1325. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002684. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
Comparison of adenoma miss rate and adenoma detection rate between conventional colonoscopy and colonoscopy with second-generation distal attachment cuff: a multicenter, randomized, back-to-back trial.传统结肠镜检查与使用第二代远端附件套囊的结肠镜检查之间腺瘤漏诊率和腺瘤检出率的比较:一项多中心、随机、背靠背试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 May;99(5):798-808.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.017. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
Texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) plus endocuff vision versus TXI alone for colorectal adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial.纹理和色彩增强成像(TXI)联合内镜黏膜切除术与单独 TXI 对结直肠腺瘤检测的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8340-8348. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10396-0. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
9
Combination of Mucosa-Exposure Device and Computer-Aided Detection for Adenoma Detection During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial.黏膜显露装置联合计算机辅助检测在结肠镜检查中腺瘤检测的随机试验。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Jul;165(1):244-251.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.237. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
10
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence With Other Interventions to Improve Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy: A Network Meta-analysis.人工智能与其他提高结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率干预措施的比较:一项网状Meta分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 1;58(2):143-155. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001813.