• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较“生命简单七要素”和“生命基本八要素”与心力衰竭风险的关系。

Comparing Life's Simple 7 and Life's Essential 8 With Risk of Heart Failure.

作者信息

van Loon Inge G, van der Schouw Yvonne T, Handoko M Louis, Verschuren W M Monique, Uijl Alicia

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JACC Adv. 2025 Sep 12;4(10 Pt 2):102127. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102127.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102127
PMID:40945429
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Better cardiovascular health (CVH) lowers risk of heart failure (HF). CVH can be quantified using Life's Essential 8 (LE8), a score consisting of 8 health factors and behaviors.

OBJECTIVES

The authors assessed the association between LE8 and risk for HF, and compared LE8 with its predecessor, Life's Simple 7 (LS7).

METHODS

We included 37,803 participants from the EPIC-NL (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Netherlands) cohort. The LE8 score ranged from 0 to 100 and was categorized into low (0-49), moderate (50-79), and high (80-100) CVH. CVH classification was compared between LS7 and LE8 scoring. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess LE8 score with risk of HF, and CVH reclassification from LS7 to LE8.

RESULTS

Participants were predominantly female (74%), with a median age of 52 years (Q1-Q3: 42-58). Compared to low CVH (4%), those with high CVH (21%) had an 82% lower risk of developing HF (HR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.12-0.26). CVH classification differed substantially between LE8 and LS7, with 75% vs 36% having moderate CVH, respectively, which could be attributed to an upward shift (90%) of participants from LS7 low CVH to LE8 moderate CVH. A graded, nonlinear association with risk for HF was observed for LE8, especially for moderate CVH scores.

CONCLUSIONS

LS7 and LE8 differ in scoring and CVH classification. While a strong inverse association exists between LE8 score classification and HF risk, the association is graded over the whole LE8 range, suggesting that nuances may be overlooked when using the proposed CVH classification for exploring HF risk.

摘要

背景

更好的心血管健康(CVH)可降低心力衰竭(HF)风险。CVH可使用生命必需的8项指标(LE8)进行量化,该评分由8项健康因素和行为组成。

目的

作者评估了LE8与HF风险之间的关联,并将LE8与其前身生命简单7项指标(LS7)进行比较。

方法

我们纳入了来自EPIC-NL(欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查-荷兰)队列的37803名参与者。LE8评分范围为0至100,并分为低(0-49)、中(50-79)和高(80-100)CVH。比较了LS7和LE8评分的CVH分类。使用调整后的Cox比例风险模型评估LE8评分与HF风险以及从LS7到LE8的CVH重新分类情况。

结果

参与者主要为女性(74%),中位年龄为52岁(第一四分位数-第三四分位数:42-58岁)。与低CVH(4%)相比,高CVH(21%)者发生HF的风险降低82%(风险比:0.18;95%置信区间:0.12-0.26)。LE8和LS7的CVH分类存在显著差异,分别有75%和36%的人具有中度CVH,这可归因于参与者从LS7低CVH向上转移至LE8中度CVH(90%)。观察到LE8与HF风险存在分级的非线性关联,尤其是对于中度CVH评分。

结论

LS7和LE8在评分和CVH分类方面存在差异。虽然LE8评分分类与HF风险之间存在强烈的负相关,但这种关联在整个LE8范围内是分级的,这表明在使用提议的CVH分类探索HF风险时,细微差别可能被忽视。

相似文献

1
Comparing Life's Simple 7 and Life's Essential 8 With Risk of Heart Failure.比较“生命简单七要素”和“生命基本八要素”与心力衰竭风险的关系。
JACC Adv. 2025 Sep 12;4(10 Pt 2):102127. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102127.
2
Association between Life's Essential 8 and risk of heart failure: findings from the Kailuan study.生命基本八项与心力衰竭风险之间的关联:开滦研究的结果
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf024.
3
Comparative Discrimination of Life's Simple 7 and Life's Essential 8 to Stratify Cardiovascular Risk: Is the Added Complexity Worth It?生活简单 7 项与生活基本 8 项对心血管风险分层的比较鉴别:增加复杂性是否值得?
Circulation. 2024 Mar 19;149(12):905-913. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065472. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Association between the Life's Essential 8 Health Behaviors and Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.生命必需的8种健康行为与晚期心血管-肾脏-代谢综合征患者预后的关联
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf443.
5
Life's Essential 8 and the risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生命基本八项与心血管疾病风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Apr 2;32(5):358-373. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae280.
6
Cumulative Life's Essential 8 Scores and Cardiovascular Disease Risk.累积生命必需八项评分与心血管疾病风险
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0630.
7
The association between the American heart association's new "Life's Essential 8" and different types of arthritis: insights from a large population study.美国心脏协会新的“生命关键八项”与不同类型关节炎之间的关联:一项大型人群研究的见解
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10201-z.
8
Association of life's essential 8 and genetic predisposition with the risk of osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study.生命必需的8项指标与遗传易感性与骨关节炎风险的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Nutr. 2025 Sep 5;12:1642749. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1642749. eCollection 2025.
9
Associations of street-view greenspace exposure with cardiovascular health (Life's Essential 8) among women in midlife.中年女性街道景观绿地暴露与心血管健康(生命八大要素)的关联
Biol Sex Differ. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13293-025-00718-3.
10
Life's Essential 8 scores, socioeconomic deprivation, genetic susceptibility, and new-onset chronic kidney diseases.生命必需的8项评分、社会经济剥夺、遗传易感性和新发慢性肾脏病。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 Aug 5;138(15):1835-1842. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003491. Epub 2025 Apr 14.