• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of chronic home care on admission to institutions providing long-term care.长期居家护理对入住长期护理机构的影响。
Can Med Assoc J. 1977 Oct 8;117(7):747-9.
2
Impact of long-term home care on hospital and nursing home use and cost.长期居家护理对医院和养老院使用情况及成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1987 Apr;22(1):19-47.
3
Square pegs in round holes: a study of residents in long-term institutions in London, Ont.格格不入:安大略省伦敦市长期机构中居民的一项研究
Can Med Assoc J. 1977 Dec 3;117(11):1284-7.
4
Forecasting client transitions in British Columbia's Long-Term Care Program.预测不列颠哥伦比亚省长期护理计划中的客户转移情况。
Health Serv Res. 1987 Dec;22(5):671-706.
5
Canadian study shows promising results on home care cost effectiveness.
Caring. 2000 Jun;19(6):42-5.
6
Cost analysis of an intensive home follow-up program for first-time post-myocardial infarction patients and their families.首次心肌梗死后患者及其家属强化家庭随访项目的成本分析
Dynamics. 2001 Winter;12(4):25-31.
7
Comparison of resource utilization for Medicaid dementia patients using nursing homes versus home and community based waivers for long-term care.使用养老院与基于家庭和社区的豁免计划为医疗补助痴呆症患者提供长期护理的资源利用情况比较。
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):449-53. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181621eae.
8
Direct admission to an extended-care facility from the emergency department.从急诊科直接转入长期护理机构。
Eff Clin Pract. 1999 May-Jun;2(3):114-9.
9
Forecasting demand for long-term care services.预测长期护理服务的需求。
Health Serv Res. 1985 Oct;20(4):435-60.
10
How does Cash and Counseling affect costs?现金与咨询如何影响成本?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 2):488-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00680.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Long term home care or institutionalization?长期家庭护理还是机构护理?
Can Fam Physician. 1978 May;24:459-60.
2
Chronic home care in ontario: five year follow up.安大略省的慢性家庭护理:五年随访。
Can Fam Physician. 1982 Sep;28:1531-7.
3
The care of the aged: a responsibility & challenge for the family physician.老年关怀:家庭医生的责任与挑战。
Can Fam Physician. 1979 Dec;25:1489-92.
4
Improving the long-term care of the elderly in the community.改善社区老年人的长期护理。
Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Mar 18;118(6):614.

本文引用的文献

1
A community home-care program.一个社区家庭护理项目。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1972 Oct;20(10):500-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1972.tb02148.x.

长期居家护理对入住长期护理机构的影响。

Effect of chronic home care on admission to institutions providing long-term care.

作者信息

Kraus A S, Armstrong M I

出版信息

Can Med Assoc J. 1977 Oct 8;117(7):747-9.

PMID:409477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1880051/
Abstract

Home care programs are operating throughout Ontario. In October 1975 pilot-test chronic home care (CHC) programs were added in three areas. Whether the Kingston CHC program prevented or delayed admission to an institution providing long-term care was studied in the 218 patients admitted to the program up to mid-March 1976. Forms were completed for all 218 patients admitted, for the 109 still in the program 6 months later, and for the 131 who had left the program by August 1976. Of the 218 patients 20% had applied for admission to an institution providing long-term care before applying for CHC, and another 22% had seriously considered applying to such an institution. The CHC staff judged that 61% would have needed institutional care without CHC. Only 12% of the 218 patients left the CHC program to enter an institution, only 1 of the 48 patients discharged to self-care at home was considering a move to an institution, and only 2 receiving CHC for 6 months applied to an institution during that time. CHC therefore seems to delay greatly admission to an institution providing long-term care for a substantial group of patients.

摘要

安大略省各地都在开展家庭护理项目。1975年10月,在三个地区试点慢性家庭护理(CHC)项目。对截至1976年3月中旬进入该项目的218名患者进行了研究,以确定金斯顿CHC项目是否预防或延迟了患者入住提供长期护理的机构。为所有218名入院患者、6个月后仍在该项目中的109名患者以及到1976年8月已离开该项目的131名患者填写了表格。在218名患者中,20%在申请CHC之前已申请入住提供长期护理的机构,另有22%曾认真考虑申请此类机构。CHC工作人员判断,如果没有CHC,61%的患者将需要机构护理。218名患者中只有12%离开CHC项目去入住机构,48名出院回家自理的患者中只有1名考虑搬入机构,在接受CHC护理6个月的患者中,只有2名在此期间申请入住机构。因此,CHC似乎大大延迟了相当一部分患者入住提供长期护理的机构。