Lim Geok Hoon, Al Shukairi Aisha Masoud, Lee Yien Sien, Teo Sze Yiun, Yan Zhiyan, Tan Qing Ting, Gudi Mihir, Ng Ruey Pyng, Wong Fuh Yong
Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Gland Surg. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):1529-1538. doi: 10.21037/gs-2025-166. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has been proposed as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients with metastatic nodal disease. However, there is lack of standardization of TAD technique. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of various localization techniques in TAD and assess the oncological outcomes of TAD alone versus ALND.
Breast cancer patients with histologically proven nodal metastasis (T1-4N1-2M0) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Patients were divided into three groups: TAD-alone, TAD with ALND, and upfront ALND. Localization techniques used during TAD were assessed and oncological outcomes were compared between the TAD alone and ALND groups. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03878017).
One hundred and twenty-three patients, of which 18, 18, 87 underwent TAD alone, TAD with ALND and upfront ALND respectively, were included. All localization techniques, such as skin marking, Savi Scout and radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) resulted in 100% retrieval of the marked node. Single-agent sentinel node localization during TAD was feasible. After a median follow-up of 13 and 23 months for the TAD-alone and ALND groups respectively, there were no significant differences in their oncological outcomes.
Various localization techniques, including the less studied skin marking and ROLL, were effective in TAD. During TAD, single agent may be used for sentinel node localization. TAD alone did not have inferior oncologic outcomes on short term follow-up and may replace ALND in patients with complete nodal pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings need validation in larger studies with longer follow-up.
对于有淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者,新辅助化疗后行靶向腋窝清扫术(TAD)已被提议作为腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)的替代方案。然而,TAD技术缺乏标准化。本研究旨在前瞻性评估TAD中各种定位技术的有效性,并评估单纯TAD与ALND的肿瘤学结局。
纳入经组织学证实有淋巴结转移(T1-4N1-2M0)且接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者。患者分为三组:单纯TAD组、TAD联合ALND组和直接行ALND组。评估TAD期间使用的定位技术,并比较单纯TAD组和ALND组的肿瘤学结局。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符:NCT03878017)。
共纳入123例患者,其中分别有18例、18例、87例接受单纯TAD、TAD联合ALND和直接行ALND。所有定位技术,如皮肤标记、Savi Scout和放射性引导隐匿性病变定位(ROLL),标记淋巴结的取出率均为100%。TAD期间单药前哨淋巴结定位是可行的。单纯TAD组和ALND组分别中位随访13个月和23个月后,其肿瘤学结局无显著差异。
包括研究较少的皮肤标记和ROLL在内的各种定位技术在TAD中均有效。在TAD期间,单药可用于前哨淋巴结定位。单纯TAD在短期随访中肿瘤学结局并不差,对于新辅助化疗后淋巴结病理完全缓解的患者,可能替代ALND。我们的研究结果需要在随访时间更长的大型研究中进行验证。