• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡侧前臂游离皮瓣和腓骨游离皮瓣修复口腔颌面部缺损:马来西亚梳邦再也医院和马来西亚国家癌症研究所的一年经验

Reconstruction of Oromandibular Defects With Radial Forearm Free Flaps and Fibular Free Flaps: One-Year Experience From Hospital Selayang and the National Cancer Institute, Malaysia.

作者信息

Abdul Rashid Mohammad Azrul, Arsad Syahril Rizal, Muhammad Nawawi Rashdeen Fazwi

机构信息

Hand and Microsurgery Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Hospital Selayang, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Sep 12;17(9):e92146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92146. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.92146
PMID:40949076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12428924/
Abstract

Background Oromandibular defects are complex to reconstruct, often requiring free tissue transfer. Radial forearm free flaps (RFFFs) and vascularized fibular free flaps (VFFFs) are among the most established techniques. This study aimed to evaluate short-term outcomes, complications, and donor-site morbidity of RFFFs and VFFFs in oromandibular reconstruction over a one-year period at Hospital Selayang and the National Cancer Institute, Malaysia. Methodology A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent oromandibular reconstruction with RFFFs or VFFFs between July 2022 and July 2023. Outcomes assessed included flap survival, donor-site morbidity, and patient satisfaction. Results A total of 16 patients were included, of whom 10 received an RFFF and six received a VFFF. All RFFF cases achieved 100% early flap survival, while one VFFF case (13%) failed and required removal. Donor-site morbidity in the RFFF group included superficial radial nerve sensory deficits (70%), cold intolerance (40%), and dissatisfaction with scarring (40%). In the VFFF group, no foot drop, nerve injury, or ankle instability occurred; however, leg swelling (40%) and cold intolerance (40%) were reported. Conclusions Both RFFF and VFFF are effective for oromandibular reconstruction. RFFF is more suitable for soft tissue defects, while VFFF remains the preferred option for osseous reconstruction. To maximize outcomes, it is necessary to individually select flaps based on defect characteristics and patient factors.

摘要

背景

口腔颌面部缺损的重建较为复杂,通常需要游离组织移植。桡骨前臂游离皮瓣(RFFFs)和带血管蒂腓骨游离皮瓣(VFFFs)是最成熟的技术之一。本研究旨在评估马来西亚梳邦再也医院和国家癌症研究所在一年时间内,RFFFs和VFFFs在口腔颌面部重建中的短期疗效、并发症及供区发病率。

方法

对2022年7月至2023年7月期间接受RFFFs或VFFFs口腔颌面部重建的患者进行回顾性研究。评估的结果包括皮瓣存活情况、供区发病率和患者满意度。

结果

共纳入16例患者,其中10例接受了RFFFs,6例接受了VFFFs。所有RFFFs病例早期皮瓣存活率均达到100%,而1例VFFFs病例(13%)失败并需要移除。RFFFs组的供区并发症包括桡浅神经感觉障碍(70%)、不耐寒(40%)和对瘢痕不满意(40%)。VFFFs组未发生足下垂、神经损伤或踝关节不稳;然而,报告有腿部肿胀(40%)和不耐寒(40%)。

结论

RFFFs和VFFFs在口腔颌面部重建中均有效。RFFFs更适合软组织缺损,而VFFFs仍然是骨重建的首选。为了使疗效最大化,有必要根据缺损特征和患者因素个体化选择皮瓣。

相似文献

1
Reconstruction of Oromandibular Defects With Radial Forearm Free Flaps and Fibular Free Flaps: One-Year Experience From Hospital Selayang and the National Cancer Institute, Malaysia.桡侧前臂游离皮瓣和腓骨游离皮瓣修复口腔颌面部缺损:马来西亚梳邦再也医院和马来西亚国家癌症研究所的一年经验
Cureus. 2025 Sep 12;17(9):e92146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92146. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Medial sural artery perforator free flap versus radial forearm free flap in oral cavity reconstruction and donor site morbidity.腓肠内侧动脉穿支游离皮瓣与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣在口腔重建及供区并发症中的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 24;28(5):269. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05618-1.
3
[Application of functional perforator flap transplantation with chimeric iliac bone flap in reconstruction of composite tissue defects of hand or foot].带嵌合髂骨瓣的功能性穿支皮瓣移植在手足复合组织缺损修复中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Sep 15;39(9):1098-1105. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202506020.
4
Reconstruction of oromandibular defects by vascularized free flaps: the radial forearm free flap and fibular free flap as major donor sites.采用带血管游离皮瓣修复口腔颌面部缺损:以桡侧前臂游离皮瓣和腓骨游离皮瓣作为主要供区。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jul;67(7):1473-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.286.
5
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
6
Optimising oral cancer reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study on the modified radial forearm free flap technique to eliminate the need for a secondary donor site.优化口腔癌重建:一项关于改良桡侧前臂游离皮瓣技术以消除对二次供区需求的回顾性队列研究。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Apr;62(3):265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
7
Use of the radial forearm free flap in eyelid and orbit defect reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前臂桡侧游离皮瓣在眼睑及眼眶缺损修复中的应用:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Apr;103:204-217. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.01.067. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Higher incidences of neuropathic pain and altered sensation following radial forearm free flap: A systematic review.桡侧前臂游离皮瓣后神经病理性疼痛和感觉改变发生率较高:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.028. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
Mandible Reconstruction in a Rural Population: Comparison of Radial Forearm and Free Fibula Flap Outcomes.农村人群下颌骨重建:桡骨前臂皮瓣和游离腓骨瓣结果的比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(1):119-124. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009832. Epub 2023 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Conservative versus surgical treatment of foot drop in peroneal nerve entrapment: rationale and design of a prospective, multi-centre, randomized parallel-group controlled trial.保守与手术治疗腓总神经卡压性足下垂:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机平行组对照试验的原理和设计。
Trials. 2022 Dec 30;23(1):1065. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07009-x.
2
Higher incidences of neuropathic pain and altered sensation following radial forearm free flap: A systematic review.桡侧前臂游离皮瓣后神经病理性疼痛和感觉改变发生率较高:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.028. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
Management of Flap Failure After Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.头颈部重建后皮瓣失败的处理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;167(2):224-235. doi: 10.1177/01945998211044683. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
Long-term functional outcomes of vascularized fibular and iliac flap for mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.带血管腓骨和髂骨瓣用于下颌骨重建的长期功能结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Feb;74(2):247-258. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.094. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
5
Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft.利用游离带血管腓骨骨移植进行骨重建的并发症。
BMC Surg. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00875-9.
6
The Evolution of the Free Fibula Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction: 21 Years of Experience with 128 Flaps.游离腓骨肌皮瓣在头颈部重建中的应用演变:128 个皮瓣的 21 年经验。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021 May;37(4):372-379. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717101. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Donor site morbidity following radial forearm free flap reconstruction with split thickness skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy.游离前臂皮瓣重建术后使用负压伤口治疗技术行断层皮片移植供区并发症。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May 21;48(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0344-9.
8
Worldwide 10-Year Systematic Review of Treatment Trends in Fibula Free Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction.全球范围内对游离腓骨瓣用于下颌骨重建治疗趋势的10年系统评价。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;74(12):2526-2531. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.170. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
9
Long-term biomechanical analysis of donor site morbidity after radial forearm free flap.桡侧前臂游离皮瓣供区并发症的长期生物力学分析
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;43(9):1776-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.039. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Long-term functional donor site morbidity of the free radial forearm flap in head and neck cancer survivors.游离桡侧前臂皮瓣在头颈部癌症幸存者中的长期功能供区发病率。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jan 13;43(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-43-1.