Hashimoto Mamoru, Fukiage Ken, Taniguchi Kosei, Minami Takafumi, Fukuokaya Wataru, Mori Keiichiro, Yanagisawa Takafumi, Tsujino Takuya, Maenosono Ryoichi, Saruta Masanobu, Takahara Kiyoshi, Hashimoto Takeshi, Hirasawa Yosuke, Azuma Haruhito, Ohno Yoshio, Shiroki Ryoichi, Fujita Kazutoshi
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Aug 30;14(8):2279-2288. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-254. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
The treatment strategy for urothelial carcinoma has advanced with the development of enfortumab vedotin (EV); however, a comparative analysis of its therapeutic efficacy between upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder cancer (BCa) has yet to be established. We aimed to compare the effects of EV after pembrolizumab treatment between the patients with UTUC and BCa.
We included the patients with advanced UC patients who received EV after pembrolizumab in this retrospective study. We investigated the impact of various clinical variables including age, primary site of disease (UTUC BCa), Liver metastasis, lung metastasis, prior number of regimens before EV treatment, and ECOG PS, which influenced on prognosis and efficacy of EV treatment.
A total of 63 male and 23 female patients were included in our study. The number of UTUC and BCa patients were 33 and 53, respectively. The UTUC cohort had a significantly older patient population and a greater incidence of lung metastases compared to the BCa group. The prognosis of UTUC patients were not significantly different from BCa patients. However, UTUC was determined as significant factor to predict better overall response rate than BCa in multiple logistic regression analysis.
UTUC patients showed significantly better response to EV treatment than BCa patients.
随着恩杂鲁胺(EV)的发展,尿路上皮癌的治疗策略取得了进展;然而,其在上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)和膀胱癌(BCa)之间的治疗效果比较分析尚未确立。我们旨在比较UTUC患者和BCa患者在帕博利珠单抗治疗后使用EV的效果。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了在帕博利珠单抗治疗后接受EV的晚期UC患者。我们调查了各种临床变量的影响,包括年龄、疾病原发部位(UTUC与BCa)、肝转移、肺转移、EV治疗前的既往治疗方案数量以及ECOG PS,这些因素影响了EV治疗的预后和疗效。
我们的研究共纳入了63例男性和23例女性患者。UTUC患者和BCa患者的数量分别为33例和53例。与BCa组相比,UTUC队列的患者年龄显著更大,肺转移发生率更高。UTUC患者的预后与BCa患者无显著差异。然而,在多因素逻辑回归分析中,UTUC被确定为预测总体缓解率优于BCa的显著因素。
UTUC患者对EV治疗的反应明显优于BCa患者。