Suppr超能文献

多替拉韦转换期间HIV-1病毒载量抑制和耐药模式:一项基于人群的纵向研究

Patterns of HIV-1 viral load suppression and drug resistance during the dolutegravir transition: a population-based longitudinal study.

作者信息

Martin Michael A, Blenkinsop Alexandra, Moffa Michelle, Reynolds Steven James, Nalugoda Fred, Quinn Thomas C, Kigozi Godfrey, Ssekubugu Robert, Gupta Ravindra K, Grayson Nicholas E, MacIntyre-Cockett George, Kagaayi Joseph, Nakigozi Gertrude, Abeler-Dörner Lucie, Fraser Christophe, Ratmann Oliver, Tobian Aaron A R, Laeyendecker Oliver, Moyo Sikhulile, Kennedy Caitlin E, Bonsall David, Galiwango Ronald Moses, Grabowski M Kate

出版信息

medRxiv. 2025 Sep 2:2025.09.01.25334862. doi: 10.1101/2025.09.01.25334862.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on the population-scale impact of dolutegravir (DTG)-based HIV regimens in sub-Saharan Africa are extremely limited. We used data from a surveillance cohort in southern Uganda to assess viral suppression and antiretroviral (ART) resistance over 10-years alongside DTG scale-up.

METHODS

Consenting participants in the population-based Rakai Community Cohort Study between August 2011 and March 2023 aged 15-59 completed questionnaires and provided samples for HIV testing, viral load quantification, and viral deep-sequencing. We collected data on DTG-utilization at HIV care clinics. We estimated the prevalence of HIV suppression (<1,000 copies/mL) and ART resistance using robust Poisson regression. Bayesian logistic regression quantified associations between resistance and individual-level suppression across surveys.

FINDINGS

Among 20,383 people living with HIV (PLHIV), suppression increased from 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.4%-58.8%) to 90.3% (95%CI: 89.2%-91.4%) between 2014 and 2022. By 2020 84.4% (95%CI: 83.7%-85.2%) and 64.6% (95%CI: 63.9%-65.3%) of men and women were on DTG regimens. Among treatment-experienced viremic PLHIV, overall resistance decreased from 51.1% (95%CI: 40.7%-64.1%, 2014) to 27.9% (95%CI: 21.3%-36.5%, 2022). Only two participants harbored intermediate/high-level DTG resistance, attributable to inQ148R, inE138K, and inG140A. Low-level INSTI resistance (inS153Y) was observed in 23/207 (7.5%) of viremic individuals, with putative evidence of transmission. By 2022, suppression was unrelated to prior history of NNRTI/NRTI resistance (risk ratios: 1.14, 95%HPD: 0.96-1.32 and 1.12, 95%HPD: 0.88 - 1.35).

INTERPRETATION

Viral suppression increased during the DTG-transition with minimal emerging intermediate/high-level resistance. Falling resistance among treatment-experienced PLHIV underscores the role of ART adherence in reducing viremia. The emergence of inS153Y justifies continued genomic surveillance of ART resistance.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health and the Gates Foundation.

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT

We searched PubMed for studies matching the keywords "HIV" "resistance" "cohort" "dolutegravir" published after 2018, when dolutegravir (DTG) was first recommended for first-line use globally, and identified 108 studies. We excluded 78 studies, one for being a pure modeling study, one for being about HIV-2, two for being duplicates, two for being study protocols, five for evaluating DTG efficacy as a second, not first, line regimen, 11 for not including any data on individuals on DTG, 17 for focusing on a single sub-population (e.g. children or seniors), 18 for evaluating DTG two (as opposed to three)-drug regimens, and 21 for not having relevant outcomes (e.g. insulin sensitivity). While not indexed on PubMed, we analyzed the World Health Organization HIV Drug Resistance Brief Report 2024 along with the 30 studies from our targeted search. Among the remaining 30 studies, 27 were primary research articles and the remainder reviews in addition to the WHO report. Among the primary research articles, DTG-based first-line regimens were shown to be associated with high-levels of viral suppression among both ART initiators (e.g. 83.0% in South Africa and 84.6% in Tanzania) and those transitioning to DTG from other regimens (e.g. 90.5% in South Africa, 93.8% in Uganda, and 98.4% in Lesotho). Among the four countries in the Africa region reporting to the WHO, all reported levels of viral load suppression among adults receiving ART of >90% between 2019 and 2022, however, levels were not systematically higher among those on DTG, as opposed to NNRTI-based regimens. Among two studies reporting on pre-treatment non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance in the DTG-era, it continued to increase and reached 14.3% ( =14) and 15.3% ( =137) in Tanzania and Zimbabwe, respectively. Pre-existing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance, particularly rtM184V, was associated with DTG failure in 3/4 studies in which it was reported. Among 14 studies evaluating persons failing DTG therapy, emergent DTG resistance was generally rare, on the order of 0-10%, depending on setting. Among treatment-experienced individuals who failed DTG treatment in Mozambique, however, DTG resistance was more common (19.6%, 36/183). Further, another study based in South Africa reported that 60.3% (41/68) of people failing DTG therapy harbored intermediate/high-level resistance. Across studies, the most commonly reported emergent DTG-resistance conferring mutations were, E138K, G190A, Q148H/K/R, N155H/D, and R263K. Among existing real-world studies, all were clinic-based in design, meaning they enrolled PLHIV reporting to care clinics. As not all PLHIV are engaged or retained in care, the results of these studies may not be generalizable to the broader population of PLHIV. Further, in the absence of accurate denominators on the total number of people living with and without HIV, clinic-based studies are unable to accurately assess the real-world population-scale impact of interventions such as changes to first-line treatment regimens. Further, the reviewed studies focused solely on data collected during the transition to DTG-based regimens and are therefore unable to evaluate changes in population-scale virological outcomes during DTG scale-up in light of ongoing trends towards increasing rates of treatment initiation and suppression due to scale-up of global treatment and prevention programs.In the current study, we address these limitations by evaluating population-scale real-world virological outcomes during DTG scale-up in southern Uganda using data from the population-based Rakai Community Cohort Study. We found that the population-prevalence of viral load suppression among PLHIV increased from 86.1% to 89.4% concurrent with the DTG transition. We further observe a trend towards lower rates of NNRTI and NRTI resistance among those who remain viremic despite self-reporting being on treatment alongside increased rates of suppression among those with resistance. This suggests a shift in the population of viremic treatment-experienced PLHIV away from those who remain viremic because of resistance and towards those who are disengaged from care, which is not apparent from sampling only care-seeking PLHIV. Only two viremic individuals harbored intermediate/high-level DTG resistance. We also show a continued increase in pre-treatment NNRTI resistance despite discontinuation of NNRTI-based regimens, reaching 14.8% by 2022. Encouragingly, no pretreatment intermediate/high-level DTG resistance was observed and only two people with treatment experience harbored such resistance. However, a low-level INSTI resistance mutation, inS153Y, was identified in 7.5% (23/307) of sequenced PLHIV and genetic clustering indicates potential transmission of this mutation among 5 of these individuals. The transition to DTG-based first-line regimens has supported continued increases in the population prevalence of HIV viral load suppression with limited evidence of emergent intermediate or high-level drug resistance thus far. Given minimal resistance, initiating pretreatment PLHIV on therapy and engaging disengaged treatment-experienced PLHIV are critical for continued progress towards HIV treatment milestones. Continued surveillance for resistance mutations is needed in light of increasing rates of resistance to NNRTIs, which are used in long-lasting injectable ART regimens, and for emerging novel INSTI resistance mutations.

摘要

背景

关于基于多替拉韦(DTG)的HIV治疗方案在撒哈拉以南非洲地区对人群规模影响的数据极为有限。我们利用乌干达南部一个监测队列的数据,评估了在DTG推广的10年期间病毒抑制情况和抗逆转录病毒(ART)耐药性。

方法

2011年8月至2023年3月期间,年龄在15 - 59岁、同意参与基于人群的拉凯社区队列研究的参与者完成了问卷调查,并提供了用于HIV检测、病毒载量定量和病毒深度测序的样本。我们收集了HIV护理诊所DTG使用情况的数据。我们使用稳健的泊松回归估计HIV抑制(<1000拷贝/毫升)和ART耐药性的患病率。贝叶斯逻辑回归量化了各次调查中耐药性与个体水平抑制之间的关联。

结果

在20383名HIV感染者(PLHIV)中,2014年至2022年间,病毒抑制率从57.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:55.4% - 58.8%)增至90.3%(95%CI:89.2% - 91.4%)。到2020年,84.4%(95%CI:83.7% - 85.2%)的男性和64.6%(95%CI:63.9% - 65.3%)的女性采用DTG治疗方案。在有治疗经验的病毒血症PLHIV中,总体耐药率从2014年的51.1%(95%CI:40.7% - 64.1%)降至2022年的27.9%(95%CI:21.3% - 36.5%)。仅两名参与者存在因inQ148R、inE138K和inG140A导致的中级/高级DTG耐药。在23/207(7.5%)的病毒血症个体中观察到低水平整合酶抑制剂(INSTI)耐药(inS153Y),有传播的假定证据。到2022年,抑制情况与既往非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)/核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI)耐药史无关(风险比:1.14,95%最高后验密度区间[HPD]:0.96 - 1.32;1.12,95%HPD:0.88 - 1.35)。

解读

在DTG转换期间病毒抑制增加,出现的中级/高级耐药极少。有治疗经验的PLHIV中耐药率下降凸显了ART依从性在降低病毒血症中的作用。inS153Y的出现表明有必要继续对ART耐药性进行基因组监测。

资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院和盖茨基金会。

研究背景

我们在PubMed上搜索了2018年以后发表的、匹配关键词“HIV”“耐药性”“队列”“多替拉韦”的研究,2018年多替拉韦(DTG)首次被全球推荐用于一线治疗,共识别出108项研究。我们排除了78项研究,1项为纯建模研究,1项关于HIV - 2,2项为重复研究,2项为研究方案,5项评估DTG作为二线而非一线治疗方案的疗效,11项未包含任何DTG治疗个体的数据,17项聚焦于单一亚人群(如儿童或老年人),18项评估DTG两药(而非三药)治疗方案,21项无相关结局(如胰岛素敏感性)。虽未在PubMed上索引,但我们分析了《世界卫生组织2024年HIV耐药性简要报告》以及我们定向搜索的30项研究。在其余30项研究中,27项为原创研究文章,其余除了世卫组织报告外为综述。在原创研究文章中,基于DTG的一线治疗方案在ART初治者(如南非为83.0%,坦桑尼亚为84.6%)和从其他治疗方案转换为DTG的人群(如南非为90.5%,乌干达为93.8%,莱索托为98.4%)中均显示与高水平病毒抑制相关。在世卫组织报告的非洲区域四个国家中,所有国家均报告2019年至2022年接受ART的成年人病毒载量抑制水平>90%,然而,与基于NNRTI的治疗方案相比,DTG治疗人群中的水平并非系统性更高。在两项报告DTG时代治疗前非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)耐药情况的研究中,耐药率持续上升,在坦桑尼亚和津巴布韦分别达到14.3%(n = 14)和15.3%(n = 137)。在报告了相关情况的3/4研究中,既往核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI)耐药,尤其是rtM184V,与DTG治疗失败相关。在14项评估DTG治疗失败患者的研究中,出现的DTG耐药通常很少见,根据不同情况为0 - 10%。然而,在莫桑比克接受过治疗且DTG治疗失败的个体中,DTG耐药更为常见(19.6%,36/183)。此外,另一项基于南非的研究报告称DTG治疗失败的患者中有60.3%(41/68)存在中级/高级耐药。在各项研究中,最常报告的导致DTG耐药的新发突变是E138K、G190A、Q148H/K/R、N155H/D和R263K。在现有的实际研究中,所有研究均为基于诊所的设计,这意味着他们纳入了到护理诊所就诊的PLHIV。由于并非所有PLHIV都参与或保留在护理中,这些研究结果可能无法推广到更广泛的PLHIV人群。此外,由于缺乏感染HIV和未感染HIV人群总数的准确分母,基于诊所的研究无法准确评估一线治疗方案改变等干预措施对实际人群规模的影响。此外,所审查的研究仅关注向基于DTG的治疗方案转换期间收集的数据,因此无法根据全球治疗和预防计划扩大导致的治疗启动率和抑制率上升的持续趋势,评估DTG推广期间人群规模病毒学结局变化。在本研究中,我们通过使用基于人群的拉凯社区队列研究的数据,评估乌干达南部DTG推广期间人群规模的实际病毒学结局,解决了这些局限性。我们发现PLHIV中病毒载量抑制的人群患病率从86.1%增至89.4%,与DTG转换同步。我们进一步观察到,尽管自我报告正在接受治疗但仍有病毒血症的人群中,NNRTI和NRTI耐药率呈下降趋势,同时耐药人群中的抑制率上升。这表明有病毒血症且有治疗经验的PLHIV人群发生了转变,从因耐药而仍有病毒血症的人群转向脱离护理的人群,这从仅对寻求护理的PLHIV抽样中并不明显。仅两名病毒血症个体存在中级/高级DTG耐药。我们还显示,尽管停用了基于NNRTI的治疗方案,但治疗前NNRTI耐药率持续上升,到2022年达到14.8%。令人鼓舞的是,未观察到治疗前中级/高级DTG耐药,且只有两名有治疗经验的人存在此类耐药。然而,在307名测序的PLHIV中,7.5%(23/307)鉴定出低水平INSTI耐药突变inS153Y,基因聚类表明其中5人之间可能存在该突变的传播。向基于DTG的一线治疗方案的转换支持了HIV病毒载量抑制人群患病率的持续上升,迄今为止出现中级或高级耐药的证据有限。鉴于耐药极少,对治疗前PLHIV启动治疗并使脱离治疗的有治疗经验的PLHIV参与治疗,对于朝着HIV治疗里程碑持续取得进展至关重要。鉴于用于长效注射ART方案的NNRTIs耐药率上升以及新出现的INSTI耐药突变,需要持续监测耐药突变情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9fc/12424902/25645e861d88/nihpp-2025.09.01.25334862v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验