The potential risk of ventilator-induced lung injury from five different PEEP titration techniques in ARDS.

INTRODUCTION

The optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains uncertain. This study compared the PEEP levels using five distinct titration methods to assess potential ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).

METHODS

This study included 21 patients with moderate to severe ARDS who were monitored using esophageal balloon manometry and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). A recruitment maneuver followed by decremental PEEP titration was performed. Optimal PEEP (OP) was assessed using five criteria: highest respiratory system compliance (C), highest lung compliance (C), end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (P) ≥ 0 cm HO, elastance-derived end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (P) ≤ 25 cm HO, and EIT-based analysis balancing the degree of overdistention and lung collapse.

RESULTS

Significant differences in OP were observed across the methods ( = 0.001): C 8.0 cmH₂O (8.0,13.9); C 9.8 cmH₂O (8.0,14.0); P ≥ 0 cmH₂O 14.0 cm H₂O (11.9,17.9); P ≤ 25 cmH₂O 12.0 cmH₂O (10.0,13.9); EIT balancing the degree of overdistention and lung collapse 13.01 cmH₂O (9.88,14.78). The OP guided by P of ≥ 0 cm HO is significantly higher than OP by the highest C ( = 0.001) and the highest C ( = 0.002), and met the overdistension criteria, namely plateau pressure > 30 cm HO and the highest percentage of overdistension by EIT. The PEEP guided by C had a higher potential risk of lung collapse, reflected by the negative value of P and a higher percentage of lung collapse by EIT.

CONCLUSION

Transpulmonary pressure-guided PEEP titration yielded higher PEEP levels, while C-guided PEEP was lower and associated with a higher risk of collapse. Overdistension and collapse varied with the chosen PEEP method. In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, OP can vary depending on the method of assessment.