Tepetam Hüseyin, Hanilce Mustafa Mert, Dursun Cemal Ugur, Gedik Duygu, Karabulut Gul Sule
Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 13;17(8):e89987. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89987. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast malignancy that accounts for approximately one-fifth of new breast cancer diagnoses in developed countries. While not life-threatening, DCIS is a potential precursor to invasive carcinoma, and optimal management remains a matter of debate. Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery reduces the risk of local recurrence, and hypofractionated regimens have emerged as an effective and convenient alternative to conventional fractionation. This study aimed to compare acute and late toxicity profiles between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy in DCIS patients, with a particular focus on the impact of boost administration. Methodology This retrospective study included 97 female patients with histologically confirmed DCIS treated between January 2013 and January 2025. Patients with invasive components, prior malignancy, or incomplete data were excluded. Radiotherapy was delivered using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (n = 43) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (n = 54), with conventional fractionation (50 Gy/25 fractions, used in 30.9% (30 patients)) or hypofractionated regimens (40-42.6 Gy/15-16 fractions, used in 69.1% (67 patients)). A sequential boost of 10 Gy was applied in high-risk cases. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with significance set at p-values <0.05. Results A total of 97 DCIS patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (mean age: 51 years). Hypofractionated radiotherapy was used in 69.1% (67 patients), and conventional fractionation in 30.9% (30 patients). Acute toxicity occurred in 60.8% (59 patients), while late toxicity was rare (8.2% (8 patients)) and similar across groups. Boost administration was associated with increased acute toxicity in the hypofractionated group (p = 0.044) but not in the conventional group. Only one local recurrence was observed during follow-up. Conclusions Our findings confirm that both hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy provide excellent local control and acceptable toxicity in DCIS patients, with boost administration significantly increasing acute toxicity in hypofractionated regimens. Despite these differences, long-term outcomes remain favorable, supporting the role of individualized risk-adapted radiotherapy strategies in DCIS management.
背景 导管原位癌(DCIS)是一种非侵袭性乳腺恶性肿瘤,在发达国家约占新诊断乳腺癌的五分之一。虽然DCIS不会危及生命,但它是侵袭性癌的潜在前体,最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。保乳手术后的辅助放疗可降低局部复发风险,大分割放疗方案已成为传统分割放疗的一种有效且便捷的替代方案。本研究旨在比较DCIS患者大分割放疗与传统放疗的急性和晚期毒性特征,特别关注追加放疗的影响。方法 这项回顾性研究纳入了2013年1月至2025年1月期间接受组织学确诊为DCIS的97例女性患者。排除有侵袭成分、既往有恶性肿瘤或数据不完整的患者。放疗采用三维适形放疗(n = 43)或调强放疗(n = 54),采用传统分割(50 Gy/25次,30例患者,占30.9%)或大分割放疗方案(40 - 42.6 Gy/15 - 16次,67例患者,占69.1%)。高危病例采用10 Gy的序贯追加放疗。使用SPSS 27.0版(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行数据分析,显著性设定为p值<0.05。结果 共有97例DCIS患者接受了辅助放疗(平均年龄:51岁)。69.1%(67例患者)采用大分割放疗,30.9%(30例患者)采用传统分割放疗。60.8%(59例患者)发生急性毒性,而晚期毒性罕见(8例患者,占8.2%),且各组相似。在大分割组中,追加放疗与急性毒性增加相关(p = 0.044),而在传统组中则不然。随访期间仅观察到1例局部复发。结论 我们的研究结果证实,大分割放疗和传统放疗在DCIS患者中均能提供良好的局部控制和可接受的毒性,追加放疗在大分割放疗方案中显著增加急性毒性。尽管存在这些差异,但长期结果仍然良好,支持个体化风险适应性放疗策略在DCIS治疗中的作用。