Suppr超能文献

中高危肺栓塞的管理:一项单中心回顾性研究。

Management of intermediate high-risk pulmonary embolism: a single-center retrospective study.

作者信息

Alabi Fortune O, Ghaneie Ashkan, Koury Ibrahim, Alkhateeb Hadaya A, Liu Jieying, Guo Mengni, Fawwaz Baha Aldeen B, Cordero Arelis, Umeh Fred

机构信息

Florida Lung Asthma and Sleep Specialists, Kissimmee, FL, United States.

AdventHealth- Radiology, Orlando, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 29;12:1483968. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1483968. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 25% of PE cases are intermediate-risk, with mortality rates between 5% and 25%. Management strategies for intermediate-risk PE remain inconsistent. This study compares clinical outcomes of intermediate high-risk PE patients receiving anticoagulation therapy alone (ACT) vs. those receiving systemic reperfusion therapy (RT) plus anticoagulation.

METHODS

This retrospective study at AdventHealth hospitals in Central Florida included adult PE patients with right ventricular strain diagnosed from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Exclusions were patients needing vasopressors or invasive ventilatory support at admission and those treated primarily with mechanical thrombectomy or catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: standard ACT and systemic RT plus ACT. Demographics, comorbidities, lab values, treatments, and outcomes were collected and compared.

RESULTS

Of 641 patients, 461 met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 65 and median BMI of 31.2. The cohort included 216 high-risk intermediate PE patients, with 52 patients receiving the thrombolytic therapy and 164 receiving the anticoagulation therapy. There was no significant difference in in-hospital ( = 0.450) or 30-day mortality rates ( = 0.591) between the two treatment groups. Secondary outcomes, including major bleeding ( = 0.569), use of vasopressors ( = 0.969), mechanical ventilation ( = 0.804), CPR ( = 0.450), or transfusion, also showed no significant difference. Notably, 23.2% of patients in the anticoagulation-only group required secondary thrombolytic therapy within 24 hours. Patients receiving systemic RT were younger ( = 0.017) and had a higher BMI ( = 0.012).

DISCUSSION

This study supports guidelines advising against routine use of RT for intermediate high-risk PE unless as rescue therapy. No mortality rate reduction or secondary outcome benefits were observed, highlighting the need for consistent management protocols and further research on therapeutic approaches for intermediate high-risk PE.

摘要

引言

约25%的肺栓塞(PE)病例为中危,死亡率在5%至25%之间。中危PE的管理策略仍不一致。本研究比较了单纯接受抗凝治疗(ACT)与接受全身再灌注治疗(RT)加抗凝治疗的中高危PE患者的临床结局。

方法

这项在佛罗里达州中部AdventHealth医院进行的回顾性研究纳入了2019年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间诊断为右心室劳损的成年PE患者。排除标准为入院时需要血管升压药或有创通气支持的患者以及主要接受机械血栓切除术或导管定向溶栓治疗的患者。患者分为两组:标准ACT组和全身RT加ACT组。收集并比较人口统计学、合并症、实验室检查值、治疗方法和结局。

结果

641例患者中,461例符合纳入标准,中位年龄为65岁,中位体重指数为31.2。该队列包括216例中高危PE患者,其中52例接受溶栓治疗,164例接受抗凝治疗。两个治疗组的住院死亡率(P = 0.450)或30天死亡率(P = 0.591)无显著差异。次要结局,包括大出血(P = 0.569)、血管升压药的使用(P = 0.969)、机械通气(P = 0.804)、心肺复苏(P = 0.450)或输血,也无显著差异。值得注意的是,单纯抗凝组23.2%的患者在24小时内需要二次溶栓治疗。接受全身RT的患者更年轻(P = 0.017),体重指数更高(P = 0.012)。

讨论

本研究支持指南建议,除非作为挽救治疗,否则不建议对中高危PE常规使用RT。未观察到死亡率降低或次要结局获益,这凸显了制定一致管理方案以及对中高危PE治疗方法进行进一步研究的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/792b/12425996/b8e3472d4b08/fcvm-12-1483968-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验