Suppr超能文献

[自发性气胸:导管引流还是胸腔闭式引流?]

[Spontaneous pneumothorax: drainage by catheter or chest tube?].

作者信息

Burgaud J C, Offenstadt G, Bencharif G, Hericord P, Amstutz P

出版信息

Rev Pneumol Clin. 1985;41(5):317-9.

PMID:4095427
Abstract

One hundred and fourteen spontaneous pneumothorax, idiopathic or with chest disease, were retrospectively analysed in order to compare the efficacy of suction drainage by small lumen IV catheter and by chest tube. Age, importance and tolerance of spontaneous pneumothorax were similar in both groups. Frequency of recidive and failure as well as duration of drainage were also not different. So we advocate the use of suction drainage by small lumen IV catheter. The efficacy is the same than with chest tube. But the technic is more simple and less traumatic.

摘要

对114例特发性或伴有胸部疾病的自发性气胸患者进行回顾性分析,以比较细腔静脉导管与胸管进行负压引流的效果。两组患者的年龄、自发性气胸的严重程度和耐受性相似。复发率、失败率以及引流持续时间也无差异。因此,我们提倡使用细腔静脉导管进行负压引流。其效果与胸管相同,但操作更简单,创伤更小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验