Sugiura Kota, Ono Yoshihiro, Kobayashi Kosuke, Oba Atsushi, Ito Hiromichi, Inoue Yosuke, Takahashi Yu
Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12223-0.
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, optimal techniques for pancreatic transection to minimize the risk of POPF have not been thoroughly elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of stapler-assisted pancreatic transection and reconstruction (stapler method) on the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) and to present the technical details of the stapler method, accompanied by supplementary video footage.
A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) between October 2020 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into the stapler method group and the conventional method group, in which pancreatic transection was performed using a coagulation-based technique. The incidence and risk factors for CR-POPF were analyzed, and post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) was also evaluated.
A total of 134 patients who underwent RPD were included in this study, with 61 in the stapler method group and 73 in the conventional method group. The incidence of CR-POPF was significantly lower in the stapler method group compared to the conventional method group (13.1% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, body mass index was independently associated with an increased risk of CR-POPF (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57; p < 0.001), while the stapler method was associated with a significantly reduced risk (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016). Although postoperative serum amylase levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the stapler method group (578 U/L; IQR, 292-1107) than in the conventional method group (336 U/L; IQR, 242-830; p = 0.020), the incidence of PPAP did not significantly differ between the groups (stapler method: 1.6% vs. conventional method: 1.4%, p = 1.000).
These findings suggest that the stapler method may reduce the incidence of CR-POPF in RPD without increasing the risk of PPAP.
术后胰瘘(POPF)仍是胰十二指肠切除术后的一个重要并发症。然而,尚未彻底阐明能将POPF风险降至最低的胰腺横断最佳技术。本研究旨在评估吻合器辅助胰腺横断与重建术(吻合器法)对临床相关POPF(CR-POPF)发生率的影响,并介绍吻合器法的技术细节,同时提供补充视频资料。
对2020年10月至2024年12月期间接受机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)的患者进行回顾性研究。将患者分为吻合器法组和传统法组,传统法组采用基于凝血的技术进行胰腺横断。分析CR-POPF的发生率和危险因素,并评估胰十二指肠切除术后急性胰腺炎(PPAP)。
本研究共纳入134例行RPD的患者,其中吻合器法组61例,传统法组73例。与传统法组相比,吻合器法组CR-POPF的发生率显著更低(13.1%对31.5%,p = 0.014)。在多因素分析中,体重指数与CR-POPF风险增加独立相关(OR,1.34;95%CI,1.14 - 1.57;p < 0.001),而吻合器法与风险显著降低相关(OR,0.31;95%CI,0.12 - 0.80;p = 0.016)。尽管吻合器法组术后第1天的血清淀粉酶水平(578 U/L;IQR,292 - 1107)显著高于传统法组(336 U/L;IQR,242 - 830;p = 0.020),但两组间PPAP的发生率无显著差异(吻合器法:1.6%对传统法:1.4%,p = 1.000)。
这些发现表明,吻合器法可能降低RPD中CR-POPF的发生率,且不增加PPAP的风险。