de Almeida David Josué, de Paula Thomas Vieira, Damasceno Alfredo
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Department of Neurology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Neurol Sci. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08495-y.
Previous studies on Benign Multiple Sclerosis (BMS) relied mostly on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for classification. In addition, the underlying mechanisms of BMS are not yet fully understood. Therefore, we analyzed the frequency of BMS when parameters beyond EDSS are included, and BMS neuroimaging correlates.
BMS (EDSS ≤ 3.0 after 10 years of onset) and traditional MS (EDSS > 3.0 after the same period) individuals underwent assessment of physical disability, fatigue, depression, and cognition. BMS were further classified according to a stringent EDSS-based criteria (EDSS ≤ 2.0 after 15 years of onset) and as fully benign (no fatigue, depression or cognitive deficit). We quantified lesions in four locations for dissemination in space (DIS). Logistic regression was employed to analyze clinical/demographic and neuroimaging predictors of BMS.
Individuals with traditional MS (n = 23) and BMS (n = 30) had similar frequency of depression. Thirteen (43.3%) BMS individuals had no fatigue, depression or cognitive deficit. Lesions at each DIS location were similarly distributed across groups, except for the spinal cord which was lower in BMS (p = 0.024). After logistic regression, education (OR = 0.839, 95%CI 0.716-0.984) and spinal cord lesions (OR = 1.364, 95%CI 1.054-1.765) were associated with BMS.
Individuals with the EDSS-based classification of BMS show a similar frequency of depression compared to traditional RRMS, underscoring the need of a broader definition of BMS. Higher education and less spinal cord lesions are associated with the BMS status.
以往关于良性多发性硬化症(BMS)的研究大多依赖扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)进行分类。此外,BMS的潜在机制尚未完全明确。因此,我们分析了纳入EDSS以外参数时BMS的发生率以及BMS的神经影像学相关因素。
BMS患者(发病10年后EDSS≤3.0)和传统多发性硬化症(MS)患者(同期EDSS>3.0)接受了身体残疾、疲劳、抑郁和认知方面的评估。BMS患者进一步根据基于EDSS的严格标准进行分类(发病15年后EDSS≤2.0)以及被归类为完全良性(无疲劳、抑郁或认知缺陷)。我们对四个空间扩散(DIS)部位的病灶进行了量化。采用逻辑回归分析BMS的临床/人口统计学和神经影像学预测因素。
传统MS患者(n = 23)和BMS患者(n = 30)的抑郁发生率相似。13名(43.3%)BMS患者无疲劳、抑郁或认知缺陷。除脊髓外,各DIS部位的病灶在各组中的分布相似,BMS患者脊髓病灶较少(p = 0.024)。逻辑回归分析后,受教育程度(OR = 0.839,95%CI 0.716 - 0.984)和脊髓病灶(OR = 1.364,95%CI 1.054 - 1.765)与BMS相关。
基于EDSS分类的BMS患者与传统复发缓解型MS患者的抑郁发生率相似,这突出了对BMS进行更广泛定义的必要性。受教育程度较高和脊髓病灶较少与BMS状态相关。