Huggett Jim F, Evans Daniel, O'Sullivan Denise M, Peoc'h Katell, Bakhshi-Nejad Helia, Winter Amanda, Zumla Alimuddin, McHugh Timothy D, Kohli Mikashmi, Suresh Anita, Ruhwald Morten, Pan Shiyang, Messenger Michael, Ahmad-Nejad Parviz
National Measurement Laboratory (NML), LGC, The Priestley Centre, Guildford, UK.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0750.
Molecular ' diagnostic' (IVD) tests are established for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB). What is less clear is how the use of TB or MDR-TB molecular IVD results differ across regions, whether corroborative tests are conducted and what external quality assessment (EQA) infrastructure exists to underpin test confidence. This study investigated the current international status of molecular TB IVDs methods, application and quality assessment. An online survey was distributed by the IFCC's Committee for molecular diagnostics to TB diagnostic laboratories worldwide. 118 laboratories from 41 nations indicated a range of IVDs were used. ∼75 % participated in EQA programs and 32 % reported this used the WHO International Standard. ∼65 % also delivered MDR-TB results the majority of which were used to change therapy; 1/6 of these do so without EQA evaluation of the MDR-TB result. The study demonstrates a range of IVD solutions in use for TB diagnosis along with a high uptake of EQA in support of this global uptake of this test modality. However, we also reveal gaps in quality assurance for MDR-TB testing with 10 % of the laboratories using resistant results alone without participating MDR-TB EQA. This suggest additional work is required to build on established use of EQA to better support MDR-TB testing and better ensure confident when results are used to guide antibiotic use. Addressing these gaps will ensure the accuracy of future MDR-TB results, which is critical for effective disease management and help combat TB on a global scale.
分子“诊断”(体外诊断)测试已用于结核病(TB)和耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)的诊断。目前尚不清楚的是,TB或MDR-TB分子体外诊断结果在不同地区的使用情况有何差异,是否进行了确证测试,以及存在哪些外部质量评估(EQA)基础设施来增强对测试的信心。本研究调查了分子TB体外诊断方法、应用和质量评估的当前国际现状。国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)分子诊断委员会向全球的TB诊断实验室开展了一项在线调查。来自41个国家的118个实验室表示使用了一系列体外诊断方法。约75%的实验室参与了EQA计划,32%的实验室报告使用了WHO国际标准。约65%的实验室还提供MDR-TB检测结果,其中大多数结果用于改变治疗方案;其中六分之一在未对MDR-TB结果进行EQA评估的情况下就这么做了。该研究表明,目前有一系列体外诊断方法用于TB诊断,并且EQA的接受程度很高,以支持全球对这种检测方式的采用。然而,我们也发现了MDR-TB检测质量保证方面的差距,10%的实验室仅使用耐药结果,而未参与MDR-TB EQA。这表明需要开展更多工作,在现有EQA应用的基础上更好地支持MDR-TB检测,并在结果用于指导抗生素使用时更好地确保信心。解决这些差距将确保未来MDR-TB结果的准确性,这对于有效的疾病管理至关重要,并有助于在全球范围内抗击结核病。